Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey guys,

i know it sounds like a strange question to ask, but im looking to save abit of cash here, so the question is how would i go about converting a R34 GTT to a non-turbo, just because i've found alot of the GT's for sale are expensive and many are automatic.

My girlfriend is searching for a R34, and shes still on her P1s so shes got ages to go, but im just woundering what would be involved, ive done abit of searching over the net havnt found much, but im guessing you would have to get a RB25 non-turbo exhaust manifold and new pipes to air filter from the throttle body, and remove the front mount ( if there is one ), probably alot more to it like ECU stuff etc. Well shes expecting me to do it, so gonna get a heads up.

Well any info would be sick. Thanks in advance guys

Lucas.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/367508-converting-turbo-to-na/
Share on other sites

oh not this shit again..... this has been asked many time.

long story short, while it can be done, it will result in a car that is still illegal to drive (as it is registered as a turbo vehicle) and it will have about as much power as a ford festiva (and no i'm not joking, since the turbo motor runs lower compression than the natro, so once you take the turbo off it will much noticably less power than a stock natro).

better off spending the money on a natro version, or saving the money and buying a cheap run around and saving the money until she is off her P's.

hmm i get where ur coming from, and i hate when that happens. Sorry to anoyy you mate, i searched here like 10 times different key words and it showed nothing , did google search all it was converting from N/A to turbo not the opposite. Sorry again

hmm i get where ur coming from, and i hate when that happens. Sorry to anoyy you mate, i searched here like 10 times different key words and it showed nothing , did google search all it was converting from N/A to turbo not the opposite. Sorry again

I've done similar searches and can vouch for this statement.

Begin your 2/3 years of hatred for the government and that constant sickness in your stomach whenever you think about owning a nice car.

Been doing it for around 2 years now. My lifes on hold until I can get my full license so I can get a R32 GTR and be done with all this bullshit.

Edited by SKITTLES

hmm i get where ur coming from, and i hate when that happens. Sorry to anoyy you mate, i searched here like 10 times different key words and it showed nothing , did google search all it was converting from N/A to turbo not the opposite. Sorry again

Problem is

1. Car is still illegal, its build plated as turbo

2. The lower compression turbo motor, that is now a N/A, will be even more of a slug than the normal N/A

The amount it'll cost you to rip all the turbo gear off, and put N/A stuff on... Will never be seen/returned via fuel economy or whatever. It'll take you 5-10 years to recoup the 4 figures such a conversion would cost

And then you have a car thats worth even less - and have to convert back to sell

I've done similar searches and can vouch for this statement.

Begin your 2/3 years of hatred for the government and that constant sickness in your stomach whenever you think about owning a nice car.

Been doing it for around 2 years now. My lifes on hold until I can get my full license so I can get a R32 GTR and be done with all this bullshit.

I want to make one thing clear before I say this. This comment is not directed at you, it is a generisation

Anyway:

The amount of idiot P-Platers I see in V6 commodores, Falcons, Magnas, smaller cars as well is beyond a joke. I see that many trying to "drift" or do hektic skids that It's not even funny anymore. I was never on P-Plates, I got my license before all the new laws came out. But I started in a VL Calais, got all the stupid shit out of my system in that, and bought my Skyline a year before I got off my P's. To be perfectly honest, I've never felt like a better driver then I do now, I look back on some of the shit I did and think WTF was I doing.

Like I said, this isnt a stab at you, you could be the best driver in the world. But the P-Plate laws arent just there cause the government felt like screwing everyone over. I dont agree with some of the laws in the P-Plate category, but I agree with the main principle.

Musn't have searched that hard:

http://www.skylinesa..._hl__convert+na

http://www.skylinesa..._1#entry3131456

http://www.skylinesa..._1#entry5416324

http://www.skylinesa..._1#entry5761463

And finally notice the list here, in only one section of the forum:

http://www.skylinesa...h&fromMainBar=1

And notice how nearly all the threads are locked. That's how common this question is.

As I have said time and time again. The logic behind people thinking they can get around the P plate restrictions be removing a turbo is the same as thinking of removing two spark plugs out of a V8 to make it legal...

Should it just be a forced pop-up on a members first entry on SAU stating:

-You can't take the turbo off a turbo car

-You can't take the turbo off a turbo car to drive it on P's

-No, anything over an 18" wheel will look stupid

-Flutter is bad mmmkay?

-Your NA 2.0L R32 WON'T beat anything, and a pod filter WON'T help, and you will not beat a 3.5 Magna, especially one with a cat-back

-Don't post about street racing, street drifting or streets ice-creams, the thread will be closed, you will get flamed

-The best turbo for your GTST is the one that suits the rest of your mods, power output needs, budget, and drivea-bility concerns

-300rwkw, give or take for maintenance and initial condition

ahhh.. found the thread I was looking for..... have a read of this..... sucks because attachment seems to have gone :(

really weird to picture because it was... basically the guy removed the front housing of the turbo and the core, leaving just the rear housing attached to the turbo manifold, welded a plate over the large hole where the cartridge's blades were meant to go and left the rest of the exhaust system the same...

you'll see the responses...

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/topic/300900-putting-a-turbo-back-in/page__hl__lol

you missed one or two......

power,reliability,cheap pick 2 out of the 3.

No, the ebay "t3/t4" "hybrid" "TO4E design" "stage 1/2/3" turbo for $299 is not special, it will eat your motor first drive.

And...

-That turbo will make as much power as the manufacturer says it can, provided they're not full of s**t or a el-cheapo brand and if it's set up properly on the right engine

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
    • You are all good then, I didn't realise the port was in a part you can (have!) remove. Just pull the broken part out, clean it and the threads should be fine. Yes, the whole point about remote mounting is it takes almost all of the vibration out via the flexible hose. You just need a convenient chassis point and a cable tie or 3.
×
×
  • Create New...