Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I was just thinking about RB25s and GTRSs getting to around 250 odd RWKWs with supporting mods , and wondering if E85 would push a bit further to say 270 at the treads .

I suppose the limiting factor with a GTRS would be its 0.64 AR GT28 turbine housing , I'm wondering if E85 gives lower combustion temps and EGTs and if so can a bit more exhaust flow for a given turbine housing size .

Anyone using E85 and a GTRS in their Skyline ?

Cheers A .

I was running a simple stage 1 sierra bushed highflow, 250wkw at best limited by knock to around 18psi. With the e70 I could run much more boost and timing gaining 50wkw at 20psi. The compressor didnt have much more in it though. I assume the GTRS would be similar, possibly able to run more boost than my highflow.

I used to think it was best to max out a smaller turbo but I realized the pressure in the manifold was just too great and not allowing the cylinder to empty of exhaust properly. I guess this is where the extra torque comes from when going to a larger rear housing or turbo?

Have thought about that, but it still feels mechanically mean - smallest I'd try that with would be a GT2835. Having said that, have been really interested to see how a stock turbo would go on the generally accepted "safe" boost level on E85 :ninja:

Im now running the stock M35 turbo, similar to an 0p6 34 wheel on Eflex atm on a temp tune. From 180kw on petrol to 225 on ethanol but it noses over as soon as I hit stall, 4000 rpm. Very responsive, too much so. I would hate to know the pressure in the exhaust manifold, it must be over 60psi.

I though exactlty the same disco that cooler EGTs would somehow solve the isssue of haivng too much exhaust gas there in the first place..I was going to run my little turbo on e85, but as Scott said, trying to push that much gas through the rear end, although somewhat effective, is also self defeating and probably harmful to your system in general.

In my case I thinks it would be better to simply swap out the turbo and be able to make the same power on PULP, you may gain a little lag but the power would be more effective and better for your engine as a whole. Plus PULP is everywhere :)

I would peg 280ish from a gtrs on e85

No one even dreamed 300+ was possible from a 2835 a couple of years back... So much so that when I did 320 some people called BS

Dan chin's old highflow hit 290rwkw on ethanol

You are looking at about 15% above what a given turbo is known to e capable of at th usual boost levels

I would peg 280ish from a gtrs on e85

No one even dreamed 300+ was possible from a 2835 a couple of years back... So much so that when I did 320 some people called BS

Dan chin's old highflow hit 290rwkw on ethanol

You are looking at about 15% above what a given turbo is known to e capable of at th usual boost levels

15% would be the gain with no extra boost. All depends what the tuner is comfortable with at the end of the day.

The stock turbo only made 1kw extra going from 17 to 18 psi but made another 100nm so even if the power drops off torque can still be improved. Not bad for a tiny ceramic wheel imo.

Man I would LOVE to give mine a hit on E85 and I definetely will as soon as we get it here. Would be interesting to see how far it can be pushed.

Would also make things a lot safer for me with the nitrous. Will hopefully have my car back on the dyno soon to see how what she is making these days with the gas.

So do we know the pressures in the manifold are dangerous using a 250rwkw turbo on 98 to make 270-280 on E85? I am running a very responsive hypergear turbo that makes ~250rwkw as well. My plan was to keep the responsiveness and add some more mid and top range by adding E85. Surely if I was to keep boost around 18psi it would be ok.

Whats the difference with SimonR32 running 25psi with a much larger turbo with an ethanol blend fuel?? Surely he would have quite high manifold pressures as well??

Is it the EGT's or the manifold pressure that we are mainly concerned with?

Having said that, have been really interested to see how a stock turbo would go on the generally accepted "safe" boost level on E85 :ninja:

Anyone you know that might be interested? I know someone that has some 555's "lying around" :)

So do we know the pressures in the manifold are dangerous using a 250rwkw turbo on 98 to make 270-280 on E85? I am running a very responsive hypergear turbo that makes ~250rwkw as well. My plan was to keep the responsiveness and add some more mid and top range by adding E85. Surely if I was to keep boost around 18psi it would be ok.

Whats the difference with SimonR32 running 25psi with a much larger turbo with an ethanol blend fuel?? Surely he would have quite high manifold pressures as well??

Is it the EGT's or the manifold pressure that we are mainly concerned with?

EGTs and manifold pressure are basically related, responsive turbos usually have small rear housings to help spin your turbine wheel faster..

Problem is it will only flow so much.. More power = more exhaust gas..Try pumping too much exhaust gas through a small housing and it gets red hot.

It also backs up and gets forced back into your combustion chamber which is the last place you want spent exhaust gas when you are trying to pump fresh air in there..

EGTs and manifold pressure are basically related, responsive turbos usually have small rear housings to help spin your turbine wheel faster..

Problem is it will only flow so much.. More power = more exhaust gas..Try pumping too much exhaust gas through a small housing and it gets red hot.

It also backs up and gets forced back into your combustion chamber which is the last place you want spent exhaust gas when you are trying to pump fresh air in there..

Yes and then how does this change with E85 or other higher octane fuels? Is it not making more power out of the same amount of air? Or is it just enabling your engine to work the turbo harder without experiencing detonation?

My head is not working too well this afternoon!

EGTs and manifold pressure are basically related, responsive turbos usually have small rear housings to help spin your turbine wheel faster..

Problem is it will only flow so much.. More power = more exhaust gas..Try pumping too much exhaust gas through a small housing and it gets red hot.

It also backs up and gets forced back into your combustion chamber which is the last place you want spent exhaust gas when you are trying to pump fresh air in there..

Exactly, the gasses actually make their way back into the intake on valve overlap I have been told, thats why they carbon up. Not the best way to make powah, still it works. The ethanol just gives me a false sense of security. :)

Yes and then how does this change with E85 or other higher octane fuels? Is it not making more power out of the same amount of air? Or is it just enabling your engine to work the turbo harder without experiencing detonation?

My head is not working too well this afternoon!

My opinion, ethanol makes more power due to the lazy way it burns, right through the piston stroke, which in turn makes more torque. That's why you can pump so much timing in without going backwards or detonating. As the exhaust is cooler and less dense (less carbon?) it actually causes more lag than a petrol tune I have noticed.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I thought I'd do a write up on an auto transmission fluid change for a the nissan 7 speed Automatic. At some stage the genius engineers decided that the fluid in the trans was "for the life of the transmission", (which seems kind of self supporting to me) and removed the dip stick and fill tube (funnily enough there is still a casting for it). Anyway, for this job you do need 2 specialist tools in addition to regular hand tools, jack and good chassis stands. You need a way to pump fluid up to the transmission; I got one of these but there are plenty of other options: https://www.ebay.com.au/itm/364584087070 Don't trust the generic listing though, it does not come with the required adapter for the Nissan 7 Speed. You need one of these, can't do the job without it: https://navarapart.com.au/product/genuine-nissan-patrol-y62-d23-np300-navara-re7-dipstick-fill-connector1 You need a heap of compatible transmission oil. Could be Nissan, could be anything else rated for Nissan Matic S. You need at least 10 litres, I had 15 to give it a better flush... Also, you need some biiig oil catch trays, at least one of these, or bigger if possible (volume was fine, size was very marginal): https://autobarn.com.au/ab/Autobarn-Category/Tools-%26-Garage/Specialty-Tools/Oil-Service/Garage-Tough-Oil-Drain-Pan-Black-16L---GT1068/p/TO03191 Finally, a measuring jug is very useful if your pump does not have volumes marked on it, I got a 6l one: https://www.repco.com.au/oils-fluids/fluid-accessories/measuring-jugs/penrite-measuring-jug-6l-pmj006/p/A5322648 Oh, and gloves.....this stuff is horrible (not as bad as diff oil, but getting there) ....First, jack up your car.....
    • So I mentioned the apprentice, @LachyK helped take the bonnet off. We just undid the nuts on the hinges and unclipped the gas struts, then pulled the bonnet back a little as the front was catching on the front bar.  I had a good look at everything today and have removed the rams, repaired/reset the hinges and bolted it back together like it never happened. I'll do a separate write up on the repair, and I also removed the poppers from the Fuga today too to save grief down the road.....as said above it is at least $5k to repair retail. I'm also happier about my ability to prepare a race car, and less happy about Nis-nault's engineering (I can hear @GTSBoy sAfrican Americaning) because the top hose of the radiator didn't slip off.......it snapped clean off. By practice I put the hose clamp hard up against the flare on a neck to make it least likely to ever move (thanks @Neil!). I guess that puts a little more pressure on the end of the pipe as it is further away from the rad, but still, that is pretty shit. I've put it back on for now as there was a fair bit of neck still there, but obviously there is no lip on the neck any more so I don't think I'll track it again until I have a new rad. Speaking of which....more research required. It looks like Koyo makes a standard size radiator in ally which I'll grab in the meantime, but I really want something thicker so might have to go custom in the medium term (ouch) Coolant still needs a refill and I have the pressure tester on it over night, but other than a wash down of the engine bay it seems alright. And @MBS206 noted something noisy on the front of the engine and I think I agree....time for a new accessory belt and tensioners I think.
    • our good friends at nismo make a diff for it, I have one (and a spare housing to put the centre in) on the way. https://www.nismo.co.jp/products/web_catalogue/lsd/mechanical_lsd_v37.html AMS also make a helical one, but I prefer mechanical for track use in 2wd (I do run a quaife in the front, but not rear of the R32)
    • What are we supposed to be seeing in the photo of the steering angle sensor? The outer housing doesn't turn, right? All the action is on the inside. The real test here is whether or not your car has had the steering put back together by a butcher. When the steering is centred (and we're not caring about the wheel too much here, we're talking about the front wheels, parallel, facing front) then you should have an absolutely even number of turns from centre to left lock and centre to right lock. If there is any difference at all then perhaps the thing has been put back together wrongly, either the steering wheel put on one spline (or more!) off, and the alignment bodged to straighteb the wheel, or the opposite where something silly was done underneath and the wheel put back on crooked to compensate. Nut there isn't actually much evidence that you have such a problem anyway. It is something you can easily measure and test for to find out though. My money is still on the HICAS CU not driving the PS solenoid with the proper PWM signal required to lighten the load at lower speed. If it were me, I would be putting either a multimeter or oscilloscope onto the solenoid terminals and taking it for a drive, looking for the voltage to change. The PWM signal is 0v, 12V, 0V, 12v with ...obviously...modulated pulse width. You should see that as an average voltage somewhere between 0V and 12V, and it should vary with speed. An handheld oscilloscope would be the better tool for this, because they are definitely good enough but there's no telling if any cheap shit multimeter that people have lying around are good enough. You can also directly interfere with the solenoid. If you wire up a little voltage divider with variable resistor on it, and hook the PS solenoid direct to 12V through that, you can manually adjust the voltage to the solenoid and you should be able to make it go ligheter and heavier. If you cannot, then the problem is either the solenoid itself dead, or your description of the steering being "tight" (which I have just been assuming you mean "heavy") could be that you have a mechanical problem in the steering and there is heaps of resistance to movement.
    • Little update  I have shimmed the solenoid on the rack today following Keep it Reets video on YouTube. However my steering is still tight. I have this showing on Nisscan, my steering angle sensor was the closest to 0 degrees (I could get it to 0 degrees by small little tweaks, but the angle was way off centre? I can't figure this out for the life of me. I get no faults through Nisscan. 
×
×
  • Create New...