Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • 2 weeks later...

***UPDATE***

Hey guys, just ordered the new wheels to fit the widebody. GTR D's in Flat Black, 18x10 +12 for the front and 18x12 +0 for the rears. (gonna need a bit of body bashing to fit)

domokun.gif

Also bought tyres, wrapping them in 225/40/18 Federal 595 EVO's

on another note, greddy cooler with piping for the 34 just rocked up, so ill be able to push a bit more boost out in the hot weather when i get back up north.

once again ill update with pics once i get back home.

for now, here's some of the parts from website photo's

Wheels:-

gtrd_small_sized.jpg?TT=0.501759259259259

Widebody:-

e27823562c31989ae6747f80fa798a8a.jpg

1627e18833e13a904a07f51fefc0c19a.jpg

Full Bodykit:-

d43d2527dfd0537695666674cc04e3b7.jpg

Thanks for all the replies guys, keep them coming!

Edited by jamie curran

its all about the stretch

don't be a pussy jamie, 205/60 on the 10's and 235's on the 12's. it can be done but you'll have to join NS afterwards :P

jokes, get some decent rubber 255 on front and 275 rear's and fill the guards.

how long til its kitted and painted?

@robbo

Fill the guards? dude, im already struggling to get these under the guards how it is, ill see how it goes for the next set of tyres, but at the moment, i want them to fit on the car :P

  • 2 weeks later...

Hey guys, here's some pics of the front quarters and the rear bar. everyone knows what r32 rears look like and i dont have pics of the front bar cause it isnt here yet :S

img1541rf.jpg

img1545f.jpg

and whilst cleaning out the garage laugh.gif

img1549u.jpg

Rims should have been sent today after tyres being fitted.

Edited by jamie curran

*UPDATE!*

Hey guys, gonna start on test fitting the new body kit tomorrow so today i started stripping banana.gif

oh yer, this happened ˇˇ thumbsup.gif

img1692x.jpg

img1701gs.jpg

Pic of the GReddy side mount cooler

img1703oz.jpg

Quarters coming off (and my crack)

img1706o.jpg

img1713x.jpg

Rear bar is off and car is ready for test fitting!!!! (no. plate is for skidz) cheers.gif

img1735oq.jpg

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
×
×
  • Create New...