Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

aaron can you stop with the pointless posting in every thread please. maybe use the chat thread??

mate dont f**king point the finger at me, your the one who post's a lot of pointless shit too. i'm not f**king chuckie or Dirty RS whore for you do dig shit at me.

  • Replies 193
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

P.S. I am not trying to piss anyone off but it was bought up on the weekend from a new person that it is finding it hard to sift through the crap....and we are all guilty!

Back on subject!thanks.gif

Edited by Jetwreck
  • 1 month later...

hey guys,

more questions from me:

1. what size is the centre bore of M35s?

2. if i wanna get hubcentric spacers, which car would be the same as the M35? i'm taking a wild guess that it's the same as the 350Z

a straight and certain answer would be much appreciatedthumbsup.gif

cool thanks guys...planning to get a set of spacers since i'm gonna buy a set of wheels with high offset

how thick should i go for the spacers? the wheels are +55 offset

Edited by Sydsyd

18x7.5, they are the AUDM civic type R wheels

planning to use 20mm hubcentric spacers so in the end it'll be +35

It's a terrible idea to start out with wheels of such a bad offset; and they're not enough of an upgrade to even get decent sized rubber on.

Wait until you can get something more suitable IMO.

  • 2 weeks later...

got more questions:

1. just lowered the rear 1cm more, now car sit much more flatter, did wheel alignment and got told that the passenger steering arm is bent. question is does anyone have a spare one? if so how much? if not then how do i get replacement other than from stealership/dealership?

2. are there any front camber kits for M35? i was told to get a set if possible as front camber currently sits at between 1.75 and 2 degrees...as much as i like the stance, i'd like to save my tyres from camber wear...

thanks guysthumbsup.gif

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • They care about emissions, and cost the most. Save weight where possible, and make manufacturing easier. Less material also let's the engine transfer heat to water quicker, and bring the engine up to temp quicker, better for emissions and getting them past their warranty period.
    • I was under the impression the reason why OEMs are going with solutions like relatively thin "right-sized" cylinder walls with technologies like PTWA and open deck is because they care a lot about whatever marginal knock margin benefits they get from that vs the structural rigidity benefits of a closed deck block and thicker cylinder walls. I also see some weird stuff like plastic inserts in the water jacket around the cylinders to try and equalize cylinder wall temperatures. re: the PRP blocks and heads at the end of the day it's hard to know what is and isn't going to work there, just have to see what the initial buyers say about it.
    • Which is why I didn't mention that hardness testing, and specifically mentioned the bore and deck thickness testing. Yeah, not really. The bore temperature will be a lot more even around the top half inch or so, where the material distribution is dominated by the deck, and which is the only place where the bore surface temperature heating any gas in the cylinder is likely to have any effect on detonation. Think about it. Another inch or so down the bore, you might have a hotter spot. The gas there might get a bit hotter, then the piston rises squeezes that gas away from there at high speed and mixes it with other gas from nearby. Instant dilution of the problem. I'd be surprised if it was an issue at any time other than in racing engines or OEM dev engines being run at the ragged edge of tuning. Say what now?
    • https://dsportmag.com/the-tech/education/engine-tech-material-hardness-testing/ The PRP testing on block hardness I'm not sure how much it actually can be trusted. The thinner cylinder walls on RBs is a bit of a problem vs 2JZ but it really depends on the design goal. Siamesed cylinder bores like a 2JZ cause uneven cylinder wall temps too, which means a bit of distortion induced by that + the hotspot can affect knock margin. Something that actually gives me a bit of pause with the PRP block, whether super thick cylinder walls are going to keep it from being drop-in compatible on an otherwise OEM rebuild. 
    • Yeah very valid point. I am waiting for one of the other tuners to come back from vacation so he can help me a bit when the cat is installed again. In the meantime I am going to finish up my polishing and ceramic coating that I have started myself.    N45 Dr Beasley product is highly recommended for a paint primer / polisher. Using this EXO Gtechniq also for the ceramic but next time might use the light serum before hand also. Looks great. 
×
×
  • Create New...