Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

On a separate note, I was told by the precision guys that a .82 T3 open housing flows the same as between a .58 and .68 T4 open housing. Can anyone confirm? Sounds quite dubious.

That does sound VERY dubious. Why would the fact it has a T3 or T4 flange change the flow unless the T3 flange was actually limiting flow??

Whereas a twin scroll T4 turbo for example has 2 smaller separate paths for air to flow all the way through the turbo, not just at the flange.

My understanding is the flange just has to be big enough so as not to be a restriction in comparison to the flow the turbo can deliver.

I dont know of any rb30s with precision turbos. What do 2JZ supras with precision turbos run?

That does sound VERY dubious. Why would the fact it has a T3 or T4 flange change the flow unless the T3 flange was actually limiting flow??

Whereas a twin scroll T4 turbo for example has 2 smaller separate paths for air to flow all the way through the turbo, not just at the flange.

My understanding is the flange just has to be big enough so as not to be a restriction in comparison to the flow the turbo can deliver.

I dont know of any rb30s with precision turbos. What do 2JZ supras with precision turbos run?

There may be some merit in his comment no? A T4 of the same a/r when compared to a T3 by definition should flow more; more area, larger nozzle = more flow. He did also agree with what was mentioned above in that a divided housing would flow roughly equal to one size lower in open flange form (not that i didnt believe that ;) )

Here's an interesting 2JZ auto dyno with a 6262 .68. However even his seems restricted. 19 psi run (im choking hard on 15). Source: http://www.clublexus...-automatic.html

PT6262_NOV09.jpg

Edited by ST240

That looks like a horribly mismatched turbo, full boost at over 5k on a 3L and torque starts dropping off straight away and it only makes ~320rwkw?

What a heap of shit lol. A gt3076 on 18psi would be on song by 3.3k and make ~300rwkw on the same boost on a 3L

Edited by Rolls

Like i said I have a divided manifold with the appropriate runners in each port. What I lack is dual wastegates.

On a separate note, I was told by the precision guys that a .82 T3 open housing flows the same as between a .58 and .68 T4 open housing. Can anyone confirm? Sounds quite dubious.They also told me they dont offer any larger turbines because they "feel you should be moving to a 6265 if youre flowing that much". Lol. Guess the GT35R with a 1.06 is a silly idea then :rolleyes: .

Don't happen to have a sensor bung at all you could measure the pressure with in the exhaust manifold? :)

That would give you the answer very quickly.

Also done runs without the exhaust on the car? (dump only etc?)

That looks like a horribly mismatched turbo, full boost at over 5k on a 3L and torque starts dropping off straight away and it only makes ~320rwkw?

What a heap of shit lol. A gt3076 on 18psi would be on song by 3.3k and make ~300rwkw on the same boost on a 3L

You aren't the first person to say this. Another member on here ran a Precision 5557 on his 25det and had similar results; lots of boost and not a lot of power. Define horribly mis matched? It has almost the exact same specs as a GT35R! I'm really starting to wonder about Precision.

Don't happen to have a sensor bung at all you could measure the pressure with in the exhaust manifold? :)

That would give you the answer very quickly.

Also done runs without the exhaust on the car? (dump only etc?)

I was thinking of doing this thru my egt port but figured it was kind of moot as per this discussion and nistune load tapering off :) . What is it again, backpressure equalling 2x your boost means its restricted? I have not tried dump only.

Edited by ST240

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...