Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey guys, just wondering if there is a way to calculate rwhp from 1/4 mile trap speed, and what time this car would be capable of with a better takeoff. My clutch was slipping on anything harder then a 2000rpm launch so i could never take off quickly.

weight: 1430kg

ET: 15.017

Trap: 97.22mph

60": 2.348

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/372424-rwhp-from-14-mile-trap/
Share on other sites

Try this Formula it works out the same as Moroso power calculator<br style="-webkit-box-shadow: none !important; "><br style="-webkit-box-shadow: none !important; ">Need speed and vehicle weight with driver<br style="-webkit-box-shadow: none !important; "><br style="-webkit-box-shadow: none !important; ">.00426 x MPH x = = x weight <br style="-webkit-box-shadow: none !important; "><br style="-webkit-box-shadow: none !important; "><br style="-webkit-box-shadow: none !important; ">.00426 x 118 x == x 3400 = 431.8 , same as Moroso if you set speed and check against weight.

Vehicle weight must be in pounds (2.2 pounds to a Kilo) and it gives rear wheel horsepower

So in your case it would be

.00426 x 97.22 x == x 3146 = 223.49 HP

Try this:

http://www.race-cars...calculator.html

1430kg= approx 3,153lb

I got 226rwhp (166.2rwkw) for you using that page.

I used this page with my Rx7 just to see when I took it to the drags and it wasnt too far off

Edited by Scottydoo

Try this:

http://www.race-cars...calculator.html

1430kg= approx 3,153lb

I got 226rwhp (166.2rwkw) for you using that page.

I used this page with my Rx7 just to see when I took it to the drags and it wasnt too far off

I have always used that and same, it has always been close to what the car has run.

Having said that though, it should be used as a guideline only, as ratio's play a major factor in E.T.

Ye ratios make a big difference indeed.

When the OP said 1430, given its a N/A 300ZX - i simply based off my time of around 1500kg as there is no way a 300zx comes in @ 1430 with a driver :D

I still say 130-140rwkw with that MPH for a 1500-1550kg car

Ye ratios make a big difference indeed.

When the OP said 1430, given its a N/A 300ZX - i simply based off my time of around 1500kg as there is no way a 300zx comes in @ 1430 with a driver :D

I still say 130-140rwkw with that MPH for a 1500-1550kg car

My 300ZX is 1430kg without driver :D Since its the slicktop 2 seater version(no targa tops, no un-necessary electronics etc). It came in at 1506(or so) on the weighbridge with me in it. Diff ratio is 4.08 if it makes a difference?? Since i have a new clutch going in soon, do you guys think a mid 14 would be on the cards?

Edited by Super Drager

that calculator is bogus, it says my car has 700rwhp, it has 500.

r33 with 10.8 @ 135mph.

It has probably been designed with a limited range of data, most likely the more common horsepower cars, eg 2-400hp range, your data is probably an outlier in the equation so of course it won't work for all cars.

All it is is a line of best fit.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • There's restrictor pills in the stock boost control hoses. That's how they set the amount that was bled off and hence the "high" boost setting. The usual mod in the day was to remove it and send the "high" boost setting up to about 14 psi.
    • Thanks Duncan, that's the best info I've read. Furthermore after learning about the PCM programming side controlling the factory boost solenoid, the purpose of the solenoid is to "bleed" boost when pin 25 is earthed, thus allowing spring pressure in the wastegate actuator to overcome diaphragm boost pressure, thus closing or reducing the position of the wastegate flap creating more boost as the turbo is able to spin faster. It's pretty cool to see a designated Pill to do exactly this, would have liked to have seen it with a tiny filter over the end for those moments in vacuum.  The constant bleed pill has now been removed completely from the system and solenoid boost control has been restored once again.   Case closed 😂
    • The wideband reading is meaningless if it's not running. Why are you using shitty old sidefeeds on any engine, let alone a Neo? What manifold and fuel rail are you using to achieve that? Beyond that, can't help you with AEM stuff as I've never been their ECU/CAS combo.
    • Manual boost controllers (where a little of the boost was bled off) were quite common back in the day, because they were cheap and easy. Generally they had a manual adjustment screw rather than being fixed like yours. Down side is they always bleed boost, not just when you want them to so an electronic boost controller that uses a solenoid will have less lag.
    • Hello , im new here and i have A31 home build  RB25det neo stock eng / turbo  aem ems 2 blue connector  aem 3.5 map aem cas disk aem wideband connected to ecu  355 lph pump 550 nismo yellow injectors side feed aftermarket regulator  and won’t start with base aem tuner basic tune eventually flipped cas 180 degree so it triggers on correct stroke not in exhaust cycle  Now it won’t start Wideband reads 10 and 11 at lowest fuel setting  and will share calibrations soon for aem tuner i think something is wrong in aem tuner    please if you have any information, am very grateful         
×
×
  • Create New...