Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hello everyone i didn't know if i should post this in the turbo upgrade sticky, but i didn't upgrade my turbos. so i decided to add it here.

i have attached 2 dyno graphs one with standard AFM and one with Z32 AFM. i did this so new people can see how much power they can get for this modification. But remember this is how much i gained on my car, every car is different depending on mods/age/worn engine ect.... But in my instance i gained 17rwkw from adding Z32AFM to my car. Hope this helps you in deciding what mods you wanna do to your car in the future :thumbsup:.

post-43204-0-55158000-1314581997_thumb.jpg

post-43204-0-31284500-1314582013_thumb.jpg

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/375532-dyno-tune/
Share on other sites

Isn't this just standard AFM pushed to max then putting a better AFM on with a larger scope and tuning to suit and getting more power

I don't think if you had for example 190rwkw you would necessarily gain power just by adding a Z32 AFM

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/375532-dyno-tune/#findComment-5989764
Share on other sites

You should find that the z32 air flow meters will give you a larger tuning resolution that the stock ones,

but there really is no way that the Z32 AFM's can give you a power increase on their own.

The stock AFM's will run out of resolution/max out and have no more Voltage range to give at approx 300rwkw, i have had this exactly on my own car, then the Z32's are installed to give tuning resolution past this mark.

The power gain you have shown is most likely because of a diferent day on the dyno, some other modification you performed, or most likely it is running a bit leaner on boost or have more ignition timing.

Not having a go at you, just letting you and others know, that AFM's, just like upgrading fuel pumps and injectors will not give any power increase, but they will support more power.

The only other way a pair of Z32's will give more power on their own would be if the stock 65mm AFM size was restricting the motor and the 80mm size allowed the engine to breath better. The Nismo AFM's are 65mm though, with the tuning resolution of the Z32 AFM, so really, unless we are looking at 550+rwkw, i cant see that being the case :thumbsup:.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/375532-dyno-tune/#findComment-5989781
Share on other sites

Yeah Z32 won't give you more power.

Any extra power would come from tune adjustments, boost, dyno variance etc.

Could even be the old AFM's were on the way out for instance. Or you had a minor leak, so replacing/refitting piping removed that etc. Plenty of reasons why there is more power - the AFM's though ain't one of them.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/375532-dyno-tune/#findComment-5989816
Share on other sites

Hence i'm showing that having Z32AFM would give you more potential to make more power over stock items, off course to make the extra power you would need a proper dyno tune and other mods (that's why i added the mods done listed on 1st graph).

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/375532-dyno-tune/#findComment-5990155
Share on other sites

No you said: "how much power people can get from this modification".

That is distinctly different to "give you more potential to make more power ".

The AFM swap did not give you power. Something else did.

It's common knowledge a Z32 or Nismo AFM will 'read' more air than a stock AFM.

Either way @ 250rwkw, your stock AFMs were not maxed out.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/375532-dyno-tune/#findComment-5990177
Share on other sites

Hello everyone i didn't know if i should post this in the turbo upgrade sticky, but i didn't upgrade my turbos. so i decided to add it here.

i have attached 2 dyno graphs one with standard AFM and one with Z32 AFM. i did this so new people can see how much power they can get for this modification. But remember this is how much i gained on my car, every car is different depending on mods/age/worn engine ect.... But in my instance i gained 17rwkw from adding Z32AFM to my car. Hope this helps you in deciding what mods you wanna do to your car in the future :thumbsup:.

Just that part there may have been a poor choice of words. I get what your saying

But the way you put it just sounds like you mean "Put a Z32 AFM on and you'll get more power"

Question but for the more experienced users on here:

Say for a 150rwkw Skyline with a Power FC, just as an example - Would having a standard AFM be better then a Z32 as the resoloution isnt spread out so much? Or am I completely misunderstanding the idea behind this

The way I see it, if you have a 20x20 map on a stock AFM thats good for 150kw (I'm just using a random figure), then you have a 20x20 map with a Z32 AFM map thats good for 300kw (again hypothetical figure). You've got so many more cells to tune the amount of airflow for 150kw as its using all the cells rather then just half on the Z32.

This is just a question, as I've thought about this for a while and this is how I see it, I know that the Power FC intorpolates the 'in between' data, but still would be interesting to know if my assumption is right

Also thought the same applied for injectors? Get stupidly large injectors and you'll have plenty of room to breathe, but lose a bit of the fine tuning

Or am I completly wrong :thumbsup:

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/375532-dyno-tune/#findComment-5990184
Share on other sites

Hence i'm showing that having Z32AFM would give you more potential to make more power over stock items, off course to make the extra power you would need a proper dyno tune and other mods (that's why i added the mods done listed on 1st graph).

Well... Yeh, obviously lol.

This is like saying you had maxed your stock injectors at 200rwkw so you upgraded your injectors and now make 300rwkw, therefore the injectors gave you an additional 100rwkw. In reality it didn't, it was the other things you modified that gave you the power increase.

I'm not sure what you were trying to show by posting this? I mean is that not the exact reason everyone upgrades their AFM, because they have maxed their stock item?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/375532-dyno-tune/#findComment-5990185
Share on other sites

Question but for the more experienced users on here:

Say for a 150rwkw Skyline with a Power FC, just as an example - Would having a standard AFM be better then a Z32 as the resoloution isnt spread out so much? Or am I completely misunderstanding the idea behind this

The way I see it, if you have a 20x20 map on a stock AFM thats good for 150kw (I'm just using a random figure), then you have a 20x20 map with a Z32 AFM map thats good for 300kw (again hypothetical figure). You've got so many more cells to tune the amount of airflow for 150kw as its using all the cells rather then just half on the Z32.

This is just a question, as I've thought about this for a while and this is how I see it, I know that the Power FC intorpolates the 'in between' data, but still would be interesting to know if my assumption is right

Also thought the same applied for injectors? Get stupidly large injectors and you'll have plenty of room to breathe, but lose a bit of the fine tuning

Or am I completly wrong :thumbsup:

if you set up the power fc to suit yes you would have more accuracy with a standard afm, but you'd be lucky to notice any difference. the afm voltage and power fc load points arent linear either, its exponential. for example, on the power fc base map for a rb25 the last load point (p20) is double p15 and nearly 4 times p10. its set up this way to give more accurate tuning under light load. also you can adjust the load points to suit but the base settings (which almost everyone uses until they max them) arent scaled to suit the standard afm, they suit up to and over 300rwkw without any resolution problems.

as for injectors the only reason you lose fine tuning is if the injectors cant atomize properly at idle and low load or if the ecu/injector drivers arent capable of opening them for short periods with enough accuracy. with a good ecu and decent injectors (id2000s for example) you can have the car idling at the same AFR's and with the same quality as standard injectors.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/375532-dyno-tune/#findComment-5990413
Share on other sites

No you said: "how much power people can get from this modification".

That is distinctly different to "give you more potential to make more power ".

The AFM swap did not give you power. Something else did.

It's common knowledge a Z32 or Nismo AFM will 'read' more air than a stock AFM.

Either way @ 250rwkw, your stock AFMs were not maxed out.

what about if it were a r33 gtst, would the z32 be better than a stock afm, at what power output would the z32 be best to use?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/375532-dyno-tune/#findComment-5990442
Share on other sites

what about if it were a r33 gtst, would the z32 be better than a stock afm, at what power output would the z32 be best to use?

no, the Z32 AFM is not better than the stock GTST afm. Both are 3 or 4 wire, hotwire Air flow meters that are 80mm in size.

The Z32 AFM allows for a wider tuning scale but it does zero to add more rwkw or average power etc.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/375532-dyno-tune/#findComment-5990570
Share on other sites

no, the Z32 AFM is not better than the stock GTST afm. Both are 3 or 4 wire, hotwire Air flow meters that are 80mm in size.

The Z32 AFM allows for a wider tuning scale but it does zero to add more rwkw or average power etc.

so say for example, i was at a power level between say 200 and 250kw, would using the z32 give the dyno graph a fatter curve or /more accurate or steeper curve than the standard?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/375532-dyno-tune/#findComment-5990587
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Either the WG is reaching full opening, or it is not. The "it is not" case could only occur if there was not enough time available to swing the valve fully open during that boost event. I would consider that to be unlikely, as this is a commercial product that is in use elsewhere, so it really should work. But in your case, because there is definitely SOMETHING wrong, it should not be assumed that things like that are working as they should. You should put a video camera where it can see the actuator (if at all possible) during a run to see how far it is moving.
    • I think you're mostly on the ball there. With the straight gate, I suspect the weight of the spring will determine how quickly the gate can close, when not run with active pressure drive on both sides of the diaphragm. Otherwise, with drive on both sides of the diaphragm, you could almost go without a spring at all, only needing one to make sure that the thing was actually closed while completely off boost and not having pressure available to drive it closed. Butterfly valves have mostly symmetric loading when there is flow going through them, meaning that the gas hitting the upstream part of the blade is balanced by the gas hitting the downstream part of the blade, which means you don't need actuator torque to overcome any non-symmetric flow induced loads. But the gas flow does impart a purely normal load against the shaft, which transfers into the bush/bearing at each end of the shaft and does increase the torque required to make the shaft turn. Only a little, but it is there. I have no feeling for the amount of force involved in a WG application, but it certainly could make an argument for a decent spring weight being required. But all of this is just peripheral to the actual problem here.
    • The answer to this would be I followed the documentation from Turbosmart which said each spring pressure could achieve a maximum of 5x it's rated pressure so the included smallest spring being the 6psi had a range up to 30psi. I went with the 12 because I figured it'd likely hover around 15psi as a base pressure however I was obviously wrong.    I have a log here that I'll dig out that is purely wastegate and no Mac valve controlling anything.   If it can't hold anywhere near 12psi, does that mean the straight gate is virtually wide open during a run? Or am I thinking about this all wrong.   I could Tee Piece into the cooler pipe pre intercooler where the wastegate gets its feed, and send that to the ecu and see how that reads, I just don't have a spare pressure sensor currently that's all.
    • lol nice, I wouldn't worry about sanding back the filler to check for rust then. Yep very much a thing. Personally I don't do the panel beating, its very easy to have a panel beater sort that out for you. If they aren't doing any prep work the actual panel beating generally doesn't take long at all.  Have you taken before pictures before you started this project? I'd be keen to see the before and afters when you're done.
    • Some good discussion in here, for the most part I can't really add too much to it - thought I'd add some notes to the datalog screen shot that probably aren't news to anyone but a good prop... this is assuming 25psi-ish should be the boost ceiling given the first post refers to 23psi.   To state the obvious, this issue seems super weird.  Turbo speed seems pretty lethagic to build, like the turbo isn't getting as much drive as it needs - and it doesn't help that wgdc keeps rising AFTER boost target then completely shuts duty at a point, which in theory should have the straight gate dump heaps past the turbo and funnily enough causes the huge drop off.  It seems like pretty blunt boost control tuning but I'd not call that the primary issue, so much as possibly not helping the situation. I'm curious, what does a pull look like with purely mechanical boost control?  Like purely wastegate?   There are things in this log and story that make it sound like there could be a significant restriction in the intercooler piping or something - but then it's also overshooting boost target which is NOT what you'd expect with a restriction.   I can see where people are coming from with the non-linear wastegate bypass (not that any valves are linear for this kind of thing), but it still doesn't make sense that it can't hold <20psi on a 12psi spring.    Have you, or can you try measuring pressure pre-intercooler?  Be pretty interesting to see what's happening there vs in the intake manifold - sorry if I've repeated old ground, I've kinda skimmed over but I could have missed something.  In terms of comments regarding the wg spring being closer to boost target, I haven't used a straight gate but part of the reason for having close to wg target is about fighting backpressure as well - I might be wrong, but I'd have thought that part of the point of using a butterfly valve like the straight gate does you actually don't have to resist pressure at all, on EITHER side of the gate.   It shouldn't need too much leverage to start opening, the spring being more to do with where it triggers opening as opposed to resisting boost & EMAP, though smarter people can correct me if I'm wrong there.  
×
×
  • Create New...