Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hello everyone i didn't know if i should post this in the turbo upgrade sticky, but i didn't upgrade my turbos. so i decided to add it here.

i have attached 2 dyno graphs one with standard AFM and one with Z32 AFM. i did this so new people can see how much power they can get for this modification. But remember this is how much i gained on my car, every car is different depending on mods/age/worn engine ect.... But in my instance i gained 17rwkw from adding Z32AFM to my car. Hope this helps you in deciding what mods you wanna do to your car in the future :thumbsup:.

post-43204-0-55158000-1314581997_thumb.jpg

post-43204-0-31284500-1314582013_thumb.jpg

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/375532-dyno-tune/
Share on other sites

Isn't this just standard AFM pushed to max then putting a better AFM on with a larger scope and tuning to suit and getting more power

I don't think if you had for example 190rwkw you would necessarily gain power just by adding a Z32 AFM

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/375532-dyno-tune/#findComment-5989764
Share on other sites

You should find that the z32 air flow meters will give you a larger tuning resolution that the stock ones,

but there really is no way that the Z32 AFM's can give you a power increase on their own.

The stock AFM's will run out of resolution/max out and have no more Voltage range to give at approx 300rwkw, i have had this exactly on my own car, then the Z32's are installed to give tuning resolution past this mark.

The power gain you have shown is most likely because of a diferent day on the dyno, some other modification you performed, or most likely it is running a bit leaner on boost or have more ignition timing.

Not having a go at you, just letting you and others know, that AFM's, just like upgrading fuel pumps and injectors will not give any power increase, but they will support more power.

The only other way a pair of Z32's will give more power on their own would be if the stock 65mm AFM size was restricting the motor and the 80mm size allowed the engine to breath better. The Nismo AFM's are 65mm though, with the tuning resolution of the Z32 AFM, so really, unless we are looking at 550+rwkw, i cant see that being the case :thumbsup:.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/375532-dyno-tune/#findComment-5989781
Share on other sites

Yeah Z32 won't give you more power.

Any extra power would come from tune adjustments, boost, dyno variance etc.

Could even be the old AFM's were on the way out for instance. Or you had a minor leak, so replacing/refitting piping removed that etc. Plenty of reasons why there is more power - the AFM's though ain't one of them.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/375532-dyno-tune/#findComment-5989816
Share on other sites

Hence i'm showing that having Z32AFM would give you more potential to make more power over stock items, off course to make the extra power you would need a proper dyno tune and other mods (that's why i added the mods done listed on 1st graph).

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/375532-dyno-tune/#findComment-5990155
Share on other sites

No you said: "how much power people can get from this modification".

That is distinctly different to "give you more potential to make more power ".

The AFM swap did not give you power. Something else did.

It's common knowledge a Z32 or Nismo AFM will 'read' more air than a stock AFM.

Either way @ 250rwkw, your stock AFMs were not maxed out.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/375532-dyno-tune/#findComment-5990177
Share on other sites

Hello everyone i didn't know if i should post this in the turbo upgrade sticky, but i didn't upgrade my turbos. so i decided to add it here.

i have attached 2 dyno graphs one with standard AFM and one with Z32 AFM. i did this so new people can see how much power they can get for this modification. But remember this is how much i gained on my car, every car is different depending on mods/age/worn engine ect.... But in my instance i gained 17rwkw from adding Z32AFM to my car. Hope this helps you in deciding what mods you wanna do to your car in the future :thumbsup:.

Just that part there may have been a poor choice of words. I get what your saying

But the way you put it just sounds like you mean "Put a Z32 AFM on and you'll get more power"

Question but for the more experienced users on here:

Say for a 150rwkw Skyline with a Power FC, just as an example - Would having a standard AFM be better then a Z32 as the resoloution isnt spread out so much? Or am I completely misunderstanding the idea behind this

The way I see it, if you have a 20x20 map on a stock AFM thats good for 150kw (I'm just using a random figure), then you have a 20x20 map with a Z32 AFM map thats good for 300kw (again hypothetical figure). You've got so many more cells to tune the amount of airflow for 150kw as its using all the cells rather then just half on the Z32.

This is just a question, as I've thought about this for a while and this is how I see it, I know that the Power FC intorpolates the 'in between' data, but still would be interesting to know if my assumption is right

Also thought the same applied for injectors? Get stupidly large injectors and you'll have plenty of room to breathe, but lose a bit of the fine tuning

Or am I completly wrong :thumbsup:

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/375532-dyno-tune/#findComment-5990184
Share on other sites

Hence i'm showing that having Z32AFM would give you more potential to make more power over stock items, off course to make the extra power you would need a proper dyno tune and other mods (that's why i added the mods done listed on 1st graph).

Well... Yeh, obviously lol.

This is like saying you had maxed your stock injectors at 200rwkw so you upgraded your injectors and now make 300rwkw, therefore the injectors gave you an additional 100rwkw. In reality it didn't, it was the other things you modified that gave you the power increase.

I'm not sure what you were trying to show by posting this? I mean is that not the exact reason everyone upgrades their AFM, because they have maxed their stock item?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/375532-dyno-tune/#findComment-5990185
Share on other sites

Question but for the more experienced users on here:

Say for a 150rwkw Skyline with a Power FC, just as an example - Would having a standard AFM be better then a Z32 as the resoloution isnt spread out so much? Or am I completely misunderstanding the idea behind this

The way I see it, if you have a 20x20 map on a stock AFM thats good for 150kw (I'm just using a random figure), then you have a 20x20 map with a Z32 AFM map thats good for 300kw (again hypothetical figure). You've got so many more cells to tune the amount of airflow for 150kw as its using all the cells rather then just half on the Z32.

This is just a question, as I've thought about this for a while and this is how I see it, I know that the Power FC intorpolates the 'in between' data, but still would be interesting to know if my assumption is right

Also thought the same applied for injectors? Get stupidly large injectors and you'll have plenty of room to breathe, but lose a bit of the fine tuning

Or am I completly wrong :thumbsup:

if you set up the power fc to suit yes you would have more accuracy with a standard afm, but you'd be lucky to notice any difference. the afm voltage and power fc load points arent linear either, its exponential. for example, on the power fc base map for a rb25 the last load point (p20) is double p15 and nearly 4 times p10. its set up this way to give more accurate tuning under light load. also you can adjust the load points to suit but the base settings (which almost everyone uses until they max them) arent scaled to suit the standard afm, they suit up to and over 300rwkw without any resolution problems.

as for injectors the only reason you lose fine tuning is if the injectors cant atomize properly at idle and low load or if the ecu/injector drivers arent capable of opening them for short periods with enough accuracy. with a good ecu and decent injectors (id2000s for example) you can have the car idling at the same AFR's and with the same quality as standard injectors.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/375532-dyno-tune/#findComment-5990413
Share on other sites

No you said: "how much power people can get from this modification".

That is distinctly different to "give you more potential to make more power ".

The AFM swap did not give you power. Something else did.

It's common knowledge a Z32 or Nismo AFM will 'read' more air than a stock AFM.

Either way @ 250rwkw, your stock AFMs were not maxed out.

what about if it were a r33 gtst, would the z32 be better than a stock afm, at what power output would the z32 be best to use?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/375532-dyno-tune/#findComment-5990442
Share on other sites

what about if it were a r33 gtst, would the z32 be better than a stock afm, at what power output would the z32 be best to use?

no, the Z32 AFM is not better than the stock GTST afm. Both are 3 or 4 wire, hotwire Air flow meters that are 80mm in size.

The Z32 AFM allows for a wider tuning scale but it does zero to add more rwkw or average power etc.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/375532-dyno-tune/#findComment-5990570
Share on other sites

no, the Z32 AFM is not better than the stock GTST afm. Both are 3 or 4 wire, hotwire Air flow meters that are 80mm in size.

The Z32 AFM allows for a wider tuning scale but it does zero to add more rwkw or average power etc.

so say for example, i was at a power level between say 200 and 250kw, would using the z32 give the dyno graph a fatter curve or /more accurate or steeper curve than the standard?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/375532-dyno-tune/#findComment-5990587
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I think the concept is highlighting the various scenarios where thicker oil helps, and thicker oil potentially doesn't help and only generates heat and costs power, in turn for safety which isn't actually any safer (unless you're going real hot). If anything this does highlight why throwing Castrol 10w-60 for your track days is always a solid, safe bet. 
    • Jason should have shown a real viscosity vs temp chart. All the grades have very little viscosity difference at full operating temperature.
    • Oops... I meant to include the connector  view... BR/W - power from fuse L/W - motor negative to fan control amp (and off to HVAC pin19) OR/B - PWM signal (from HVAC pin20) B --  ground  
    • Yep, if you are applying filler it sounds like there is something wrong with the body lol. Safe to assume there is going to be a lot of sanding going on if your still applying fillers.  Picture a perfect bare metal panel, smooth as glass. You lay down your primer, it's perfect. (why are you going to sand it?) You lay down the colour and clear, it's perfect. No sanding at all took place and you've got a perfectly finished panel.  You won't be chasing your tail, sounds like you were prepping to start laying filler. If your happy with the body after the sanding, there is some bare metal exposed and some areas with primer, no issues at all, start laying the filler. You are safe to lay filler on bare metal or primer (of course check your technical data sheet as usual for what your filler is happy to adhere to).  This isn't a 100% correct statement. There is primer that is happy to adhere to smooth bare metal. There are fillers that are happy to adhere to smooth bare metal. Just make sure you're using the right materials for the job.  Typically if you are using filler, you would go primer, colour and clear. I've never seen any instances before where someone has laid colour over body filler (maybe this happens, but I haven't seen it before). So your plan sounds pretty normal to me. 
    • I don't think there's any way someone is push starting this car.. I honestly can barely move it, and moving it and steering it is just flat out not possible. I'm sure it is, but needs a bigger man than me. I have a refurbished starter now. The starter man was quite clear and consise showing me how nothing inside a starter really should contribute to slow cranking, and turned out that for the most part... my starter was entirely fine. Still, some of the wear items were replaced and luckily it didn't show any signs of getting too hot, being unfit for use, etc. Which is 'good'. I also noticed the starter definitely sounded different, which is a bit odd considering nothing should have really changed there.... Removed and refit, and we'll pretend one of the manifold bolts didn't fully tighten up and is only "pretty" tight. GM only wants 18ft/lb anyway. I also found a way to properly get my analog wideband reading very slightly leaner than the serial wideband. There's Greg related reasons for this. The serial output is the absolute source of truth, but it is a total asshole to actually stay connected and needs a laptop. The analog input does not, and works with standalone datalogging. Previously the analog input read slightly richer, but if I am aiming at 12.7 I do not want one of the widebands to be saying 12.7 when the source of truth is 13.0. Now the source of truth will be 12.65 and the Analog Wideband will read 12.7. So when I tune to 12.7 it'll be ever so slightly safer. While messing with all of this and idling extensively I can confirm my car seems to restart better while hot now. I did add an old Skyline battery cable between the head and the body though, though now I really realise I should have chosen the frame. Maybe that's a future job. The internet would have you believe that this is caused by bad grounds. In finding out where my grounds actually were I found out the engine bay battery post actually goes to the engine, as well as a seperate one (from the post) to the body of the car. So now there's a third one making the Grounding Triangle which is now a thing. I also from extensive idling have this graph. Temperature (°C) Voltage (V) 85 1.59 80 1.74 75 1.94 70 2.1 65 2.33 60 2.56 55 2.78 50 2.98 45 3.23 40 3.51 35 3.75 30 4.00   Plotted it looks like this. Which is actually... pretty linear? I have not actually put the formula into HPTuners. I will have to re-engage brain and/or re-engage the people who wanted more data to magically do it for me. Tune should be good for the 30th!
×
×
  • Create New...