Jump to content
SAU Community

2011 Motogp Thread.


Nee-san
 Share

Recommended Posts

This is the 2011 MotoGP thread because much to my surprise we haven't got one.

Starting off, Casey Stoner cuts a pretty tidy lap to throw himself onto pole position for Misano tonight, who's watching ?

Anyone think Lorenzo can catch and pass Stoner over a race distance without some sort of bingle ?

Who will Simoncelli crash into this round ?

All these questions and more, ITT.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 486
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

I was gonna start a thread a while back, surprised there wasn't one this year..

Fell asleep and missed quali last night, but I'll be watching the first half of the race up until I have to leave for work, and the second half tomorrow...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Also, not to be discounted Moto2 is some of the best motosport on TV!!

Im a huuuuuuge Marc Marquez fan. which is strnage because typically i cant stand spaniards, but WHEN he makes it to MotoGP, ill be cheering him on as much as stoner.

Special shout out goes out to Crazy Jo too! lol the lewis hamilton of bikes

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Stoner with the new lap record.

He annoys me though ever since he pretty much called rossi a hack. Casey 9 time world champions across various classes are not hacks you f**king idiot.

Maybe, but after Rossi & Burgess spent months telling anyone who'd listen that Stoner hadn't ridden the Ducati to its potential; in spite of the fact he's the only rider to consistently win on it. And for all the big talk in the pre-season, they've produced precisely nothing in the way of results.

They've been pretty quiet about his ability lately...

Rossi's no hack; that's for sure, but he's closer to the end of his career than the start.

Edited by Daleo
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share




  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Trail braking done right, should have the rear unsettled, such that you're actually turning the car by a noticeable amount WITH the brakes, and hence noticeably less steering input.
    • No you don't. Just no more driving in the wet, and clean your window manually before you drive
    • I'm not sure if they tick your boxes, but Haltech would be my pick. I'm an Adaptronic guy from way back, and Haltech acquired Adaptronic to basically get Andy, AND his IP on how he does things like fuel modelling etc.
    • Just on this, as there's a huge issue in your assumption Dose.   The logic you've given, is the same logic old school NA guys give for "needing back pressure" in an exhaust. If you free up an exhaust system, and keep injecting the same fuel in etc, at the same timing, you'll typically drop power. Freeing the exhaust will often make an engine want a little bit more timing, and even sometimes a little more fuel, but then it'll make even more power.   There's many mods people do and "get no extra power" when running a comparison on the same tune. Imagine a car tuned for 91, but now we say put 98 in it, see no difference. But as we now have 98 fuel, you can run more timing, and make more power, as the 91 was knock limited.   So just be very wary in your claim of "don't retune it and do a back to back and you'll see". The correct approach would be tune the car with stock manifold, swap the manifold to aftermarket, and retune it again. But no one wants to do that, and all the results we get are "this was stock, and this is manifold changed and tuned" and people put it all down as just the tune doing it.
    • Unplug ECU. Unplug TPS. Unplug boost pressure sensor. Now, all the wires, placing your ground (black) multimeter lead at the ECU end, measure resistance of the 5V line at the boost sensor plug. Then do the same to the TPS plug. Then do the same for all the other wires that relate to the TPS, or boost sensor.   All of your measurements should be very very low. You're looking to see if wiring is out of wack here.   Secondly, from memory on the R33 (not a neo motor, so I'm assuming an r34) the ground wire for the TPS and boost sensor are NOT equal to ground of the car/battery. IE, DO NOT connect ground of the sensor to the engine/body of car. You'll get a ground loop, and/or potentially screw shit up. In electronics, ground for a circuit, is not necessarily equal to ground of another circuit.   So this leads me to ask, when measuring your 5V, how are you getting 1.5V? Where are your multimeter leads touching for both the red and black lead on the multimeter?   If you're measuring power on the sensor wire, and putting ground on the car chassis or negative battery terminal, that could be all of your issues in "getting 1.5v". Electronics engineers can do some funky stuff with circuits, and when both sensors are on, it's enough laid to alter how the ECU is functioning.
×
×
  • Create New...