Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 122
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

If you change all the surrounding pipes especially the angles near the afm it could bend the afm signal giving richer/leaner tune.

The purpose of the gauze is to straighten the flow. The angles before the AFM will have an effect at high flow rates but not at idle or light load. The angles after the AFM will have an effect also but only when the air reverts on closed throttle.

The purpose of the gauze is to straighten the flow. The angles before the AFM will have an effect at high flow rates but not at idle or light load. The angles after the AFM will have an effect also but only when the air reverts on closed throttle.

Not true. The gauze will put up a tiny pressure drop which will re-distribute maldistibuted air a tiny bit better. But in reality the mesh is there to protect the delicate sensing elements from flying rocks and the screwdrivers of hamfisted bush mechanics.

If you wanted to actually straighten the flow you would have to try much much harder than using a little bit of gauze. Trust me, I know this shit backwards.

He is an internet troll. http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/topic/377944-manual-to-auto/

On the subject of air flow meters, the wire mesh is there to create a laminar flow which is basically streamlining the air to get a more precise reading.

Not true. The gauze will put up a tiny pressure drop which will re-distribute maldistibuted air a tiny bit better. But in reality the mesh is there to protect the delicate sensing elements from flying rocks and the screwdrivers of hamfisted bush mechanics.

If you wanted to actually straighten the flow you would have to try much much harder than using a little bit of gauze. Trust me, I know this shit backwards.

I believe the gauze is nissans attempt to straighten the airflow hence the reason it is on both sides of the airflow meter. I think you would be surprised the difference fine mesh makes at low airflow rates. And yes I know what is involved in correctly metering air as I have calibrated at an oem level for Mazda. You would not believe how sensitive rx8 airflow meters are!

Just out of curiosity what do you do GTSBoy?

Chemical/Process/Combustion Engineer. Internal/duct flow aero being a speciality. I do aerodynamic modelling.

I can tell you for certain that unless a perforated grid/mesh type flow straightener puts up a seriously high (like at least 10% of the total pressure) restriction, it will do absolutely nothing to straighten or even out the flow. For the hole size in that mesh, you'd probably need to reduce the number of holes by a factor of 10 to start working as a flow straightener. I'm just guessing at the amount of reduction here - it might easily be higher.

If that mesh was located at the inlet of the AFM and the AFM was located immediately after an elbow, then the flow would crowd the outside of the elbow and there would be a substantial velocity profile across the AFM, with high velocity corresponding the area downstream of the outside of the elbow and low velocity, possibly even turbulent eddies caused by separation of the flow corresponding to the inside of the elbow. The sensing element will measure whatever is going past the mid-line of the AFM, however representative or non-representative that velocity is. But the mesh will be essentially transparent to the velocity profile - it will not cause a change in the bias of the flow by more than a couple of %. And the fact that there is another mesh on the outlet just goes to show that the only reason it is there is to stop mechanical damage to the sensitive stuff inside. Because there is no way that you would install a flow straightening device downstream of your sensing element. It makes no sense at all.

Flow straighteners need to consist of something perforated to put up a significant pressure drop (which is intended to work like a bunch of nozzles which convert the built up static pressure upstream into a bunch of evenly distributed and same-velocity jets), followed by a device to knock out swirl, which is most easily thought of as a bundle of drinking straws. Such a bundle will knock swirl out because any swirling flow that enters the bunch of little flow paths will then be trapped inside each flow path and will have no choice but to come out with no swirl at the other end. Well, no gross swirl across the whole flow, there may be residual swirl in each little chunk coming out of each straw. And if you are really serious, then you might have another perforated restrictor plate downstream of the straw bundle.

For a simple, single element flow straightener to have any effect at all it must have some thickness in the direction of the flow - like the straw bundle above. Compare the wire on the Nissan AFM

http://www.nissansil...10624_thumb.jpg

which has almost no thickness in any dimension, including the direction of flow, against the sort of flow conditioners that actually are intended to do some flow straightening in other AFMs, like this one

http://img261.images...maf01medrw7.jpg

or this one

http://t3.gstatic.co...3nm93Z7N9pq1QxA

(note that the first EVO one is just a small patch and that the second one covers the whole inlet end - but only the inlet end).

These are made from a honeycomb sort of punched mesh (not a wire mesh) that has a little thickness in the direction of flow. These will do a tiny bit more flow conditioning than the gauze on the Nissan ones. It's actually necessary to do some flow conditioning on these vortex counting meters because they rely on aerodynamics to work, whereas the Nissan ones are just hot wire anemometers which will work in any sort of aerodynamics, as long as they are calibrated for the aerodynamics that they are in.

And that is why Nissan ones are located immediately downstream from a bellmouth drawing from the relatively open volume of the airbox. The hope and intention is that the flow into the AFM will be relatively even just by the nature of the inlet condition. But even then it doesn't matter, because Nissan just go and tune the ECU according to what the AFM reading is in that aerodynamic situation and as long as it is repeatable on the same installation (ie all such cars) then it is fine.

Edited by dan_the_man

Also, unlike Room42, whose name I am assured refers to the capacity of his arsehole, I actually know what I am talking about.

Point proven. Internet troll. Anyone can cut and paste from wikipedia and hope to fool people. I have seen a lot of your posts in other peoples threads and you troll them too. That shit in your signature is about me. You've been reported once and now twice. Like I said last time SAU is for fostering goodwill and friendship among members. You are clearly doing the opposite of this. I have paid to be here and have been open and honest in my profile and I sure as hell don't go around abusing people like you do. Its only a matter of time before you get banned.

ban.gif

Room42,

If you can find what I've written anywhere else on the internet, then good luck to you. This shows more than ever that YOU have no idea what you're talking about. I said up front that I know this stuff backwards. What is your professional background? When was the last time you designed equipment that sold for hundreds of thousands of dollars?

Now, if you want to keep going back to the glory days of your imagined argument triumph over me in the manual to auto thread, like you seem to love to, you will note that I first up gave a perfectly valid suggestion, which was not to ruin a manual car, when you could start with an auto car. Then I re-inforced said suggestion, pointing out that one could move from existing manual car to an auto equivalent for little cost. I also mentioned that I thought that autos were unpleasant to drive. Then YOU started the more abusive part of the thread by writing a poorly phrased paragraph of tirade aimed at myself and another anti-auto poster, filled with bolded large font outburst. It was only after that that I called you a wankstain.

If you want to report me, go right ahead. I have never been banned from any forum before (well, except from PF where we all got banned several times a week for a while when it was part of the game), and I tend to think that being banned from a single model forum is hardly going to ruin my life, being populated as they are by wierdos and power nazis as they tend to be.

You sir, are dumb. That's not your fault.

Even if you are right calling people names isn't going to resolve the conflict.

Interesting points though, I personally have only done the bare minimum of study on fluid dynamics so really am out of my depth here.

Edited by Rolls

Your intake pipe looks pretty simply made so I can't see how it can affect your idle, I've made allot worse ones in the past. Also while on the afm/metal mesh discussion, I'm pretty sure the z32 mesh does pose as a restriction/air bender as mine was flat when installed and is now very sucked in towards the turbo.

Oh, it puts up a restriction, which is why you can free up some flow when you pull it out, but it's not enough restriction to change the shape of the flow. Because a Z32 meter is the same physical size as, say, an RB20 one like mine but is generally flowing a lot more air, the amount of force exerted on the mesh will of course be higher and probably would deform it. I pulled the outlet end of mine out to reduce restriction, but left the inlet end mesh in on the offchance of something bypassing the air filter and trashing the sense elements. AFMs are expensive enough not to deliberately try to wreck them. I've had three AFMs in my car on the same day on the same dyno - one with no mesh, my current one with both meshes and then again after pulling the outlet mesh, and the mixtures were essentially the same. The AFM calibration is not affected by pulling the meshes out at all.

It may change only due to a higher velocity on the inside bend/corner. But as Rob mentioned because its in a straight housing i dont think it would matter as much. Where as if it was a modded element fitted to the piping with out the casing than positioning may be important

Surely if you had a pod immediately on the end of the AFM initially and then put a 90 degree elbow prior to the AFM then this would change things?

Eg the flow would create a big velocity change on the outside of the elbow causing the amount of air actually passing the element to change?

back to the topic.

some more questions.

Which spark plugs are you using?

What gap are the spark plugs?

What coil packs do you have in the car now? which coil packs were in the car when it was tuned? was there any issues with spark when tuning ? was the gaps changed when it was tuned to now?

Who has tuned this car? i know Jez looked at it, but did he do a full tune? I don't know if he does full tunes.

The old intake pipe, was it longer then the new one by any chance?

what fuel pump is inside the car now? what pump was inside the car when it was tuned, was the old pump faulty or running badly when it was tuned? who installed the fuel pump and how good of a job did they do?

Man seriously there are sooo many variables on this cluster f**k of a thread that it is hard to keep up to it to understand the issues you are having, to me it sounds like you have 3 different problems that are not related to each other.

Anyways answer ALL the questions for me, lets see where it goes.

cheers

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I have been being VERY quiet about what you're alluding to, as it is something that ticks me off... The number of cars from factory that run coil overs is HUGE! Most of them these days do... The other part that annoys me, is people saying "Well all the incabin adjustable suspension is illegal by blah blah blah"... If that's the case, then why can I buy a car brand new that can do it if, FULL STOP in cabin adjustable suspension is illegal...   Also, I could just chuck some aftermarket shocks in my car, throw the stock springs on, after my blue slip, dump my super low springs back in. Same shock and spring style setup... Hell, they could also be the same colour springs etc.     I'm voting, BlueSlipper didn't want to touch the above car for some reason. Whether it be some sort of bias against the car, the owner, them maybe having previously done dodgy shit and now they're being super careful in case they get slapped in the face by the Gumbyment again... Find a new blueslip place.   And can confirm as you had said, yes there are holy bibles of vehicle heights, and all sorts of other suspension stuff. Heck your run of the mill mechanic, and tyre shop has access to all of that stuff. It's how they do wheel alignments...
    • Funny story Heading to Sydney this morning on the HWY there was some slow traffic, so I gave it the beans and midway through my overtaking "power run" I lost all power It seems that I missed a hose clamp,  and the MAF and filter went WiFi To make this more problematic, the little tool kit that lives in the boot, is sitting in the sun room at Goulburn......LOL Luckily for me I found a bit of steel on the side of the road that could be used like a rusty and bent flat head screw driver to tighten it up enough that it got me into Sydney, it is now all tight like a tiger with the aid of a 8mm socket Note to self: Use my brain and double check stuff, and always keep that little tool kit in the car for when I have a brain fart
    • Oh, and as for everyone with their fuel economy changes, I switch between E10 and 98 in the company car. Even do when I had personal cars that could run on E10. You know what changed my fuel economy in any noticeable way? How I drove, and where I drove. Otherwise, say on full tanks of just back and forth from work only (So same trips, same sort of traffic), couldn't notice a difference that I can correlate to the type of fuel in use. In the current vehicle, that's over 42L of USABLE fuel. While 98 is all "more energy dense", it also has higher knock resistance as it takes more energy to get it to ignite too. The longer hydrocarbons, typically more tightly bound. So running the same ignition map, can also produce less power, if there isn't enough time to get it all burnt through properly, as yep, the flame propagation speed is different from lower octane fuel to higher (Higher has a lower flame propagation, due to the more tightly bound and harder to self ignite funs. This is also typically where, a vehicle that is designed purely to run on 91 (Whether it be E10 or normal 91) usually sees absolutely no real world difference in fuel economy for the normal man, woman, or dog.
    • We've got some servos around me that have 91 with E10, 91 (no E10), 95, and 98. At those stations the change from 91 E10 to 91, is typically around 8c/L.   But lets not get started on the price of fuel in Oz. It's ridiculous. All the service stations around me, bar one, the price of fuel has been over the $2 mark per litre for the cheapest, 98 being around $2.45. That one service station is a CostCo, fuel from it comes from the same refineries, and makes no pitstops, it runs great, including the 98. In fact, I've had no issues on CostCo fuel, but plenty of issues at other stations!. The CostCo fuel, was $1.65 roughly this week for 94 with E10. $1.88 for 98. Servos directly across from it, $2.10 for 91 E10, and $2.48 for 98. The part I had to laugh at? If I drive multiple HOURS away from Brisbane, say out near Nanango, or Kingaroy, or even out to Goondiwindi, the price of their fuel, is the same as what it is at the CostCo... Oh, and that BP servo at Goondiwindi is HUGE and goes through epic turnover of fuel, so it's not sitting there for weeks going to shit. And what blows me away, my mate is one of the people who drives the Fuel Tanker all around QLD, delivering to all those places. At the same company his previous role was doing the "local haul" deliveries... Same truck, same driver, same pickup point it all comes from. So you tell me, how the hell it is 60c/L CHEAPER for fuel, when nearly all else is equal, except they require a B-Double to drive half a day out of Brisbane, and half a day back, every second day, compared to the delivery that can be under 30 minutes drive from the fuel pickup point... Not to mention, go five blocks down the road, and Ampol to Ampol will vary 30c/L... And I've had this conversation with my mate... The way it's priced, is just typical, pure and utter rubbish... He also does runs from Brisbane, to all over QLD, down to Newcastle, Sydney, Nowra, Melbourne, Geelong, and even out to parts of the NT depending on the companies needs. His main stuff is all the longer distance away from home for a few days at a time, then when he's back, he loves to just pickup extra shifts wherever he can in whichever truck, hence all the weird different places.   Oh, as for getting E10 into all the fuels in Australia... It was very quickly highlighted, that we don't have enough biomass available to use to make E10 sustainably like they require, and it would dramatically cut into our, and the worlds food chain supply...   I vote we all just start running on liquid methane gas... Plenty of that just getting tapped off at tips from underground decay... (Note, this is pure just stupid commenting. I could very easily highlight the reasons its not a good idea especially on scale...)
    • Am I correct in assuming that the R35's are getting the classic skyline haircut off the odometer?  Quick search on carsales, there are 33 08 and 09 GTR's for sale, only 2 of them have more then 100,000km's on them (116,075 and 110,000 respectively).  And somehow there are about 25 for sale with around 60,000kms? Looks like the classic skyline haircut to me =/
×
×
  • Create New...