Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

A friend of mine had a quote from a sydney based tuner recently and seemed really exxy to me.

have never paid more than $600 for a tune through unigroup, he was quoted approx $1200 for a full tune. Apparantly the tuner sounded great to deal with, asked a lot of questions etc and seemed to know what he was on about., but to me that seems a bit mental.

computer in car has previously been tuned for:

a stock rb25 with walbro fuel pump

front mount

3.5in exhaust

boost controller.

car now has:

forward plenum

bigger turbo

sard reg

bigger throttle body

Thoughts?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/378040-tuner-quote-enquiry/
Share on other sites

Ultimately it varies from shop to shop as they all have preferred ecus and might charge different depending on what you have. Yes 1200 also sounds high to me but every place has there price. Comes down to who you feel confortable withpaying money to either decide the life of your motor.

Yeah pretty much that.

I would say $1000 is the most common price you will get quoted, with $600 being one of the cheaper or 'better value'.

Ultimately I would pay $1200 for a tune being confident it would be a stout tune. I think Dart quoted me that much, but couldnt impress me on his knowledge, whereas insight motorsport quoted similar too but I believe Scott possesed the knowledge to get the results I wanted.

If going to spend big bucks on a quality tune, make sure it is a well sorted setup before you go wasting money trying to tune it. For example, I currently run a basic SR setup with a 2860 and a microtech, I doubt I will want to pay over $600 to tune it... Its nothing exotic.

just depends. if the $600 tune is 30-60 mins of work and involves a few power runs, basic cold start and cruise mapping then is it good value vs a $1200 tune which takes 4-5hrs and involves very precise mapping, road tuning for drive ability and economy, dyno for power tuning, etc.

I've seen plenty of both types of tune. sadly most were in the 60min variety. but then again does a basic set-up with standard injectors, standard AFM etc really need 5hrs of tuning? possibly not. but I know which tune I think will be better.

Sinista: was looking for some insight into possibly why the price difference as the exxy tuner did seem to know his shit and have heard good things.... however for double the price Im struggling to justify the cost.

Beer Baron:

the $600 cost tuners have both quoted around 4-5 hours dyno time...

for the expensive tuner to be justifying a $1200 tune as most tuners charging anywhere between $140 and $170 per hour, I would expect him to be spending a minimum of 7 hours on the dyno....

honestly i struggle to see how it will take this long for this kind of set up. Although I was impressed and the workshop is very clean etc etc Im struggling lol

My arse. End thread. I'm kidding tho. Just for comparisons sake I paid $187.50 total to get my car sorted on the dyno. Yes I did tune it myself beforehand and they only changed one load line, 1 degree, in about 9 cells, on my advice that it may be required. The also pulled some fuel from the middle of the map for me on my request. They added some accel enrichment to make it more driveable and smooth. They spent an hour and a half on the dyno after I had spent a while driving around tuning with the mrs.

If on the other hand you are looking to get a full tune from scratch ie: not running and no numbers in the maps, get the fuel reg adjusted, the tps set right and the boost controller set up then yes it could take all day especially if something doesn't work right like the boost controller or tps or fuel reg or manifold leak etc. And then yes at $130 an hour or whatever they charge it could definitely end up over $1000.

My 2cents...For the mods you are getting the tune touched up for, it should only take 2-3 hours. Tune it yourself and if you cant then pay whatever it cost to get it tuned. But that's just me and its only advice.

If its a quote then I would rather be told what it could be costing. He asked you plenty of questions...you have responded. Did the others ask you as many questions?

Most likely he is simply more expensive, but if someone has just thrown on a new turbo, plenum etc then I would be expecting hoses to be blowing off on boost. Have to pull plugs and change them, check AFM, fuel pressure etc...if they don't know the car then its in their interest to check things out and spend a few hours doing mechanical checks before throwing it on a dyno and stressing the engine.

The people quotiung $600 could easily sting you for a few hours extra labour because they throw it on the dyno only to be blowing hoses off. Realise the plenum install has a vacuum leak, thing misses on boost because of plug gap etc

Just some things to consider

^^^ definitely, you could go the $600 tune and find they are only expecting to tune it and be done, if problems arise well thats outside of the quote.

the $1200 tune is probably taking into consideration needing to check over the newly installed parts, double check things and then do a tune, nothing unexpected should arise in this instance, unless its something major, but then that 'something major' would happen in either case..

report back how it goes...

If its a quote then I would rather be told what it could be costing. He asked you plenty of questions...you have responded. Did the others ask you as many questions?

Most likely he is simply more expensive, but if someone has just thrown on a new turbo, plenum etc then I would be expecting hoses to be blowing off on boost. Have to pull plugs and change them, check AFM, fuel pressure etc...if they don't know the car then its in their interest to check things out and spend a few hours doing mechanical checks before throwing it on a dyno and stressing the engine.

The people quotiung $600 could easily sting you for a few hours extra labour because they throw it on the dyno only to be blowing hoses off. Realise the plenum install has a vacuum leak, thing misses on boost because of plug gap etc

Just some things to consider

I concur.

speaking of tunes, a while back i heard about this Toshi guy in Sydney who tunes the factory ecu on the fly as you drive around. ie sits next to you, plugs in his laptop and gets it all done without the need for a piggy backed ECU.

Has anyone used him? I believe he was charging 600 bucks so this seems to be an average ball park figure for most tuners. i certainly couldnt afford to pay 1200 for one!

what ever you get or pay for, make sure its not just max rwkw power tunes

make sure medium and light cruise is tuned properly, including ignition timing and afr's all through those ranges

too many tunes these day are max rwkw power tunes and the car sucks balls off max power / boost and eats through fuel on light cruise

what ever you get or pay for, make sure its not just max rwkw power tunes

make sure medium and light cruise is tuned properly, including ignition timing and afr's all through those ranges

too many tunes these day are max rwkw power tunes and the car sucks balls off max power / boost and eats through fuel on light cruise

+1

It only takes one dishonest tuner to realise someone doesn't have a lot of knowledge in tuning and take advantage by charging full price then doing half the job.

what ever you get or pay for, make sure its not just max rwkw power tunes

make sure medium and light cruise is tuned properly, including ignition timing and afr's all through those ranges

too many tunes these day are max rwkw power tunes and the car sucks balls off max power / boost and eats through fuel on light cruise

Exactly. It should only take about half an hour to get a wot tune done for someone who is familiar with rb's.

Similar story, I rang around on friday to get a dump pipe made this week. I told one guy about my car and what it has and what it needs. He's like you have to leave it with me for a few days. I told him straight up "Mate it is a couple of feet of pipe with one bend and a couple of flanges on each end". I made the mistake of leaving a high powered car with a business for a couple of days when I was 20. I got it back with different tyres on the back and a slipping clutch...There is no way I would leave my car so some apprentice can try turning it up to 5 or 600 hp and blowing it up cos it aint tuned yet.

i had mine tuned bout 6months ago, got several quotes and they were all around $600-$800, thats for a full tune starting from scratch with a power fc..

one thing i dont understand is why a fairly mildly modded car would take 5hrs on a dyno, i wouldnt go to a place charging 1200 for a tune, chances are they are just high rollers with a big name but doing the same job that the less known guys are doing...

i ended up paying well over 1200 and i felt a bit ripped off still, i think they put there efforts more into the big spenders , the guys with the best cars and biggest wallets, they dont care bout a young guy with an r33, hes small fry compared to the r35guy with $5000 to throw around so you get left till last and the job rushed, if your car is the last on the dyno and your picking it up late, like after dark, have to wonder if they have really put much effort into it..

just my opinion

Edited by SliverS2

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Or just wire a multimeter in, sit it up like it's a gauge, go for a drive, read temp gauge, read multimeter, speak to phone and tell it to take notes.
    • This is the other log file, if only we had exhaust manifold pressure - would understand what's going on a bit better   Can you take a screenshot of your wastegate setup in the Kebabtech?   Engine Functions --> Boost Control (looks like this):  
    • You just need a datalogger of some sort. A handheld oscilloscope could do it, because it will make the trace visible on screen, so you can look at the peak, or whatever you need to look at. And there are cheap USB voltage loggers available too. You could get a 2 channel one and press a button to feed voltage to the second channel at points that you want to check the sensor voltage, when you knew what the guage was saying, for example.
    • it's not the issue with making power, it's the issue with controlling boost, and this isn't the first time I've seen a 6Boost having issue with controlling boost down low.   The boost control here looks interesting.   Looking at your logs, looks like it's set to open loop boost control strategy (which is fine). We can see VCT being kept on till about 6600RPM (no issue with that). Ignition timing (I'm assuming this is E85, seems within reason too, nothing too low, causing hot EGTS and boost spiking). There's about 15 degrees of advance when your boost shoots up, however can't be this as the timing isn't single digits. I'm assuming there's no EMAP data, as I wasn't able to find it in the logs. We can see your tuner sets the WG DC to 0% after 4300RPM, trying to control boost.   My thoughts, what frequency is your wastegate set to?  AND why aren't you using both ports for better control?
    • While that sounds reasonable, this is definitely a boost control problem, but the real question is why are you having the boost control problem? Which is why I pondered the idea that there's a problem at ~4000rpm related to head flow. In that instance, you are not yet under boost control - it's still ramping up and the wastegate is yet to gain authority. So, I'm thinking that if the wastegate is not yet open enough to execute control, but the compressor has somehow managed ot make a lot of flow, and the intake side of the head doesn't flow as well as the exhaust side (more on that later), then presto, high MAP (read that as boost overshoot). I have a number of further thoughts. I use butterfly valves in industrial applications ALL THE TIME. They have a very non-linear flow curve. That is to say that there is a linear-ish region in the middle of their opening range, where a 1% change in opening will cause a reasonably similar change in flow rate, from one place to another. So, maybe between 30% open and 60% open, that 1% change in opening gives you a similar 2% change in flow. (That 2% is pulled out of my bum, and is 2% of the maximum flow capacity of the valve, not 2% of the flow that happens to be going through the valve at that moment). That means that at 30% open, a 1% change in opening will give you a larger relative flow increase (relative to the flow going through the valve right then) compared to the same increment in opening giving you the same increment in flow in outright flow units. But at 60% opening, that extra 2% of max flow is relatively less than 1/2 the increase at 30% opening. Does that make sense? It doesn't matter if it doesn't because it's not the main point anyway. Below and above the linear-ish range in the middle, the opening-flow curve becomes quite...curved. Here's a typical butterfy valve flow curve. Note that there is a very low slope at the bottom end, quite steep linear-ish slope in the middle, then it rolls off to a low slope at the top. This curve shows the "gain" that you get from a butterfly valve as a function of opening%. Note the massive spike in the curve at 30%. That's the point I was making above that could be hard to understand. So here's the point I'm trying to make. I don't know if a butterfly valve is actually a good candiate for a wastegate. A poppet valve of some sort has a very linear flow curve as a function of opening %. It can't be anyelse but linear. It moves linearly and the flow area increases linearly with opening %. I can't find a useful enough CV curve for a poppet valve that you could compare against the one I showed for the butterfly, but you can pretty much imagine that it will not have that lazy, slow increase in flow as it comes off the seat. It will start flowing straight away and increase flow very noticeably with every increase in opening%. So, in your application, you're coming up onto boost, the wastegate is closed. Boost ramps up quite quickly, because that's really what we want, and all of a sudden it is approaching target boost and the thing needs to open. So it starts opening, and ... bugger all flow. And it opens some more, and bugger all more flow. And all the while time is passing, boost is overshooting further, and then finally the WG opens to the point where the curve starts to slope upwards and it gains authority amd the overshoot is brought under control and goes away, but now the bloody thing is too open and it has to go back the other way and that's hy you get that bathtub curve in your boost plot. My position here is that the straight gate is perhaps not teh good idea it looks like. It might work fine in some cases, and it might struggle in others. Now, back to the head flow. I worry that the pissy little NA Neo inlet ports, coupled with the not-very-aggressive Neo turbo cam, mean that the inlet side is simply not matched to the slightly ported exhaust side coupled with somewhat longer duration cam. And that is not even beginning to address the possibility that the overlap/relative timing of those two mismatched cams might make that all the worse at around 4000rpm, and not be quite so bad at high rpm. I would be dropping in at least a 260 cam in the inlet, if not larger, see what happens. I'd also be thinking very hard about pulling the straight gate off, banging a normal gate on there and letting it vent to the wild, just as an experiment.
×
×
  • Create New...