Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

That 1Dx looks the shit. Lets see how nikon responds. I've been following the D800 rumour mill, 38mp or something ridiculous. Either way, the next step in cameras looks like it's going to be a pretty strong leap forward

I know it's pretty crazy. My friend who is a serious photography was telling that canon are planning to release a camera that's 54mp or something like that.

He was saying that he can't wait cause a lot of photos he has been taking lately are on film and cost shit loads to develop.

I showed him photos of the Bisley V8 u took Matt and he was very impressed.

  • Replies 187
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Why would you need 54megapixels but? Having more megapixels shouldnt get you all excited unless your printing on big billboards or actually doing proper commerical shoots. But then you should be using a mediuim format camera anyways.

You know hasselblad have been making 60plus megapixels for a long time. But totally different camera I know. Just saying.

Having more megapixels aint gonna make your pic look better.

Saying that I have used the h4d 50 and 40 and WOW. Lets just say my 16gb card filled up in no time. Will be using it again this weekend. Cant wait.

Hopefully canon brings out the 5d3 which is probably more affordable. Guess I got now till march to save up for the 1dx.

Even still would love to see some proper reviews on it specially the focusing system. Looks very interesting.

Edited by siddr20

Sidd what camera and lens did u use for that last shot?

I used a canon 5dm2 and all the pics except the wide shot of the house was taken with a 135L. The shot of the house was with a 24-70L.

Hope this helps.

Matt - nice shots of the landscape. I like the one with the ducks in the water.

How and why were u using a h4d sidd? Hire one or something? I'd love to play with one one day.

Thanks gtr, I've got one more shot to share from the Bisley shoot.

Thanks will, it was good to shoot some random stuff for a change. Back into it though, shooting a 34 with ztune kit and a 68 stand over the weekend :)

Yes it will still produce a sharp photo PROVIDING your settings are correct and focus is good.

Full Frame gives more depth and more dynamic range than a crop body (7D/50D/550D etc).

I hope this helps!

^ Yup what kory said. Having a better glass will improve your image quality, but you still need to get all the settings correct on the camera.

How and why were u using a h4d sidd? Hire one or something? I'd love to play with one one day.

Another photographer I know has one so will be borrowing his. Not sure if you can hire one easily here from a camera/lens hiring place. Actually maybe sunstudios but no doubt it will be couple of k each day. The camera is worth like 15-20k upwards depending on which model.

nice nice. i'd like to play around /watch someone use one properly one day. how did u find the tethering? Time consuming and annoying, or helpful?

Glass will help. Sensor in body will help. But what helps most is the tog. You can only polish a turd so much. :P

who has the better camera fight....funny as

edit: what do they mean by saying eg: "135L is too long", do they mean u have to stand back further from the subject to get in the frame ?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q3GsbiwYido

Edited by Astonish

who has the better camera fight....funny as

edit: what do they mean by saying eg: "135L is too long", do they mean u have to stand back further from the subject to get in the frame ?

http://www.youtube.c...h?v=q3GsbiwYido

lol wow thats alot of money wasted

"135L is too long" - Whoever said that means he thinks he needs to stand too far away from the subject to get them into the photo.

Awesome photo Sidd... Lots of emotion... really helps having such a sharp photo

Edited by wilorichie

Who said the 135L was too long? Well its a fixed prime lens so if you want to take a wide of something or fit a big group of people then it will be hard. You can take several steps back, but I normally use that lens for portraits or candid shots when I dont want to be in peoples faces.

If I were you, I would purchase the 70-200f4L lens. Super sharp and you will probably love the zoom factor. Also its not that expensive either. Go for that lens first before the 135L.

Cheers Richie.

Matt - fark you posing like a model bro!!! Time to create a page on MM :P hahahah

Latest blog post: 60% of shots taken with the 135L :)

http://sidd-rishi.com.au/blog/2/trinette-matts-wedding-2011/

Edited by siddr20

Nicely done Jay. Should work a treat, who cares if it's not pretty. Ghetto mods rock! Most of my paint kit is ghetto as. sponsored by Jaycar and shonkiness :P

Haha, my light painting kit just got an upgrade with some nice jaycar goodness. Now to find the time to use it, lol.

Gave the pano head a trial run today. Not sure if i found the nodal point properly, but wherever I moved it seemed to be working fine :confused:

(not that it matters, nothing is very straight with my setup, haha)

anyway, shot this today. spewing I didnt get a full 180 degree view in tho, had a play with some 360 deg pano viewers and this would have looked awesome if it wasnt missing a bit of sky and sand, lol

20111020-100645_P.thumb.JPG

link to larger version (600px max height)

will try and get some sort of pano viewer set up on my site soon

(oh, and panos that involve things like water are a pain in the ass :P)

Edited by Jay019

Great stiching job jay. Just looked at the bigger version. Look forward to seeing more from you.

Richie - Which pic? The one on the blog for that wedding? The first pic of the couple was probably around f11-f16, 1/160th, iso 400. Cant remember now but will have to check exif.

For the reception shots with the 135L, then it would be f2.8-f4. Hope this helps in some way? But dont follow my settings, there are other factors involved as well like ISO, shutter speed, flash settings.

But if you have specfic questions in regards to lighting etc then let me know.

Just checked out your website and noticed you do business card printing.. hmmm could be interested :)

Try a pano on a closer subject J. that will help u work out if nodal point is right. it looks close if not spot on though :)

I'm a model now. I'm gonig to put it up on a new website. Matts Models.. bypass model mayhem and go PRO :P I wish i could watermark my model shots with a special model watermark to proove i'm PRO.

here's a couple more jet ones...

6262791741_7ce2939d31_b.jpg

not the sharpest, but the colours in the sky/across plane are to good to ignore!

6263317092_5a69c24b2a_b.jpg

I'm dangerous. Who wants to be my wingman? ;)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I myself AM TOTALLY UNPREPARED TO BELIEVE that the load is higher on the track than on the dyno. If it is not happening on the dyno, I cannot see it happening on the track. The difference you are seeing is because it is hot on the track, and I am pretty sure your tuner is not belting the crap out of it on teh dyno when it starts to get hot. The only way that being hot on the track can lead to real ping, that I can think of, is if you are getting more oil (from mist in the inlet tract, or going up past the oil control rings) reducing the effective octane rating of the fuel and causing ping that way. Yeah, nah. Look at this graph which I will helpfully show you zoomed back in. As an engineer, I look at the difference in viscocity at (in your case, 125°C) and say "they're all the same number". Even though those lines are not completely collapsed down onto each other, the oil grades you are talking about (40, 50 and 60) are teh top three lines (150, 220 and 320) and as far as I am concerned, there is not enough difference between them at that temperature to be meaningful. The viscosity of 60 at 125°C is teh same as 40 at 100°C. You should not operate it under high load at high temperature. That is purely because the only way they can achieve their emissions numbers is with thin-arse oil in it, so they have to tell you to put thin oil in it for the street. They know that no-one can drive the car & engine hard enough on the street to reach the operating regime that demands the actual correct oil that the engine needs on the track. And so they tell you to put that oil in for the track. Find a way to get more air into it, or, more likely, out of it. Or add a water spray for when it's hot. Or something.   As to the leak --- a small leak that cannot cause near catastrophic volume loss in a few seconds cannot cause a low pressure condition in the engine. If the leak is large enough to drop oil pressure, then you will only get one or two shots at it before the sump is drained.
    • So..... it's going to be a heater hose or other coolant hose at the rear of the head/plenum. Or it's going to be one of the welch plugs on the back of the motor, which is a motor out thing to fix.
    • The oil pressure sensor for logging, does it happen to be the one that was slowly breaking out of the oil block? If it is,I would be ignoring your logs. You had a leak at the sensor which would mean it can't read accurately. It's a small hole at the sensor, and you had a small hole just before it, meaning you could have lost significant pressure reading.   As for brakes, if it's just fluid getting old, you won't necessarily end up with air sitting in the line. Bleed a shit tonne of fluid through so you effectively replace it and go again. Oh and, pay close attention to the pressure gauge while on track!
    • I don't know it is due to that. It could just be due to load on track being more than a dyno. But it would be nice to rule it out. We're talking a fraction of a second of pulling ~1 degree of timing. So it's not a lot, but I'd rather it be 0... Thicker oil isn't really a "bandaid" if it's oil that is going to run at 125C, is it? It will be thicker at 100 and thus at 125, where the 40 weight may not be as thick as one may like for that use. I already have a big pump that has been ported. They (They in this instance being the guy that built my heads) port them so they flow more at lower RPM but have a bypass spring that I believe is ~70psi. I have seen 70psi of oil pressure up top in the past, before I knew I had this leak. I have a 25 row oil cooler that takes up all the space in the driver side guard. It is interesting that GM themselves recommend 0-30 oil for their Vette applications. Unless you take it to the track where the official word is to put 20-50w oil in there, then take that back out after your track day is done and return to 0-30.
    • Nice, looks great. Nice work getting the factory parts also. Never know when you'll need them.
×
×
  • Create New...