Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

FOR SALE :

1998 R33 GTR VSPEC series 3 

KN6 (Dark grey/purple/blue pearl )

88,000kms

FIRM $28,000

Hello i have come to the sad conclusion that it is time to sell my Gtr . I have a few debts and Can no longer Afford to keep it . 

This is a fine example of a genuinely original S3 GTR . I searched a long time for a series 3 and came across this fresh from Japan . I am the first owner in Australia and it was complied and bought from NAGOYA MOTORS in May 2011 . 

1998 VSPEC which has ATESSA-ETS PRO unlike the standard Gtr r33 which have the non pro version , also this s3 has updated 4WD computers compared to s1/2 . The ABS module is also S3 only with 4 channel independent wheel abs (r34 Gtr) . A-LSD (active LSD) and few other mechanical differences I've seen across a few models .

The car is completely stock! I mean down to a Nissan tape player and no mods under the hood at all , the car remains as it was from the show room floor and the condition is also like new! 

I have lucky to fall upon an exhaust which is amazing quality , I only wanted to source the best parts which is why i went with FUJITSUBO GEIKEN. 

FGK Titanium (TUNED LENGTH) front pipe , it's a beautiful front pipe that has equally tuned length from both turbos , it wraps around the bell housing towards drivers side and joins back to the cat and sits tight on body.

FGK Titanium Catalytic Converter 80mm in/out , flat style for ride height . 

FGK Titanium Twin 60mm cat back . Sits tight and looks amazing underneath car , joins into a large ovel muffler and Still remains twin inside the body of muffler to a single 4" tip .

The car has been my pride and joy and I have done nothing but look after her . Since I've purchased the car I have had ZERO mechanical issues at . It seriously is like driving it new. 

I have taken it to WSID for a run down the 1/4 and got a time of 12.53 @ 178km/h . Which is amazing for factory trim . 

The boost is running 0.9bar and fitted with a xtreme HD ORGANIC clutch .

Call Glen on 0433818248

454d4065.jpg

2cd8b202.jpg

3434ac0b.jpg

78aaeeb5.jpg

f4a366d1.jpg

ff63c3d7.jpg

609cd6ec.jpg

c71fc627.jpg

86eb8d58.jpg

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/378929-1998-r33-gt-r-s3-vspec/
Share on other sites

  • Replies 49
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • 1 month later...

Hi Mate, is this car still for sale - including the titanium exhaust system? I might have a buyer liner down here in Victoria. Just need to get him to have a good look over the car.

Cheers.

  • 2 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...