Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

hey everyone about to start a rb26dett r33 gtr v-spec build. i have got so far.

3.5 inch exhaust

3 inch dump pipes

apexi air pods

splitfire coilpacks

boost increase to 14psi

tomei 260 type b cams

tomei cam gears

haltech platinum pro-plug in

any recommendations on where i should be going after this.... aiming for atleast 450-500WHP

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/379561-gtr-r33-v-spec-build/
Share on other sites

definitely going to need to change your std turbos, as stated -5 or or even -9 will make 450hp, depends what kind of package you want (response or overall power)

stock bottom end will also hold your wanted power level, question is for how long....

aiming for atleast 450-500WHP

Bottom ends still standard. I've heard there pretty good for around 600 hp is this true?

Well you do realise 600hp is pretty close to 500rwhp yes?

So if you've heard they are "good" for 600hp, and you want as LEAST 450-500rwhp - you'd certainly be pushing things gonig by that.

That said there is no magical "safe" number for power. Depends on the age of the motor, use of the car, previous life (generally unknown), tune etc etc. Basically how long is a piece of string.

End of the day i use a rule like this.

Can you afford to break it and the associated rebuild (AKA: The $10,000 adventure)?

If you answered NO - stick to Garrett -7s or -9s with 300-330rwkw (400-450rwhp)

If you answered YES - go for bigger Garrett -5s or a GT3788 370-400rwkw (500-550rwhp)

Ok thanks for the advice really appreicate it. What do most of you's decide with turbo upgrades.

1. Stay with the twin turbo set up

2. Single turbo set up

Could you please state your reasons why you decided to go which way.

Thanks again

Edited by Rumpig

Im pretty sure you have to make that decision for yourself mate.

Just ask yourself basic questions

What do you want out of the car?

Dyno Queen?

Response machine?

Good power with good - average response?

Me for example, I will be going -7's because I want response and car will be mainly street driven. And they will get me where I want to be until its time to rebuild :).

Google search is there for you.

Im running a GT35 single on my stock rb26 with poncams, safe/conservative tune on 20psi is netting me 485hp at all 4 hubs. So thats around 450rwhp. Could push 1-2 more psi but im happy with the power!

I was running a pair of -7s and i was struggling to make over 300kw without pushing the turbos too far (21psi) on the same dyno. Only difference was stock cams.

Single > -7s. Cant comment on -9s but im told they are quite similar in terms of top end power.

I rather make a comfy 450rwhp on a big single as compared running a pair of -7s or -9s to their limit to reach 450rwhp, which i doubt u will get anyway.

Also, the single setups are easier to work on.

Oh and im getting better response with the GT35 as compared to my -7s too :)

The only reason why I would consider sticking to twins is to retain the "stock" look but tbh, the benefits of the single outweigh the want for the stock look, big time.

Cue, single vs twin debate....

Oh and im getting better response with the GT35 as compared to my -7s too :)

Cue, single vs twin debate....

If im reading your comparo graph right... Your -7s were only making 220rwhp (165rwkw) @ 4500rpm ?

If this is correct, then you had an serious setup issue. Possibly boost control.

You should have had a result around 350rwhp (260rwkw) @ 4500rpm. Quite a whopping difference to say the least.

A correct/working result would actually the -7s more responsive than the single. Given a GT35 is larger than a set of -7s, that makes reasonable sense in the broad world of comparison with this type of thing.

So not really a fair of debate single vs twins if you are comparing a working set-up with one that isn't working :)

Fact; 7's wont make 500rwhp.

Fact; Most -9 results also fall short of 500rwhp, well sorted engines (read: big dollars spent) get close 350rwkw

To the OP: all the info is on here that you're asking for. 5's are the turbos to get you the hp you want without any unrequired spending or making your car an easy target for police.

Im pretty sure you have to make that decision for yourself mate.

Just ask yourself basic questions

What do you want out of the car?

Dyno Queen?

Response machine?

Good power with good - average response?

Me for example, I will be going -7's because I want response and car will be mainly street driven. And they will get me where I want to be until its time to rebuild :).

Google search is there for you.

Well said

If im reading your comparo graph right... Your -7s were only making 220rwhp (165rwkw) @ 4500rpm ?

If this is correct, then you had an serious setup issue. Possibly boost control.

You should have had a result around 350rwhp (260rwkw) @ 4500rpm. Quite a whopping difference to say the least.

A correct/working result would actually the -7s more responsive than the single. Given a GT35 is larger than a set of -7s, that makes reasonable sense in the broad world of comparison with this type of thing.

So not really a fair of debate single vs twins if you are comparing a working set-up with one that isn't working :)

Fair call, it is possible that something was wrong but im done thinking about it, the turbos were fine when they came off, the acuators were checked twice, correct preload, balanced while on dyno etc so im not sure what else could have been the issue.

An interesting comparison would be between a pair of -5s to a GT35 setup.

21psi is "too far"?

LOL

Not being rude, but that made me laugh.

I didnt say 21psi is too far.. I Re-read what i wrote, i see how u mis-read that, my bad.

I made 300awkw at 21psi (bleeding off to 18psi at redline) with my -7s. This being my personal experience, i am certain that if you want to hunt for the power level that the OP is after, they -7's will be pushed way beyond their effeciency range (too far). Hence why i said that -5's would be a better choice over -7s or -9s.

All of my tuning ventures have been on 98ron fuel so forgive me for being more conservative than you eastern staters with e85. Yes im jelly that you have it on pump and we dont but we shall not go there :)

I always use 98 when posting stuff, as do most, kinda a given.

Usually people post/make note of E85 when used.

-5 and GT35 would be much closer/interesting I agree.

Pity you -7 setup was down nearly 100kw at 4500 tho, would've really been crappy to drive!

Yeah i know! I grew tired of the lack in response and top end power although the mid-range wasnt too bad but now my car is making good power everywhere so im happy and not complaining :)

If anyone has a gt35 vs -5 comparison on the same dyno please share!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Well, that's kinda the point. The calipers might interfere with the inside of the barrels 16" rims are only about 14" inside the barrels, which is ~350mm, and 334mm rotors only leave about 8mm outboard for the caliper before you get to 350, And.... that;s not gunna be enough. If the rims have a larger ID than that, you might sneak it in. I'd be putting a measuring stick inside the wheel and eyeballing the extra required for the caliper outboard of the rotor before committing to bolting it all on.
    • OK, so again it has been a bit of a break but it was around researching what had been done since I didn't have access to Neil's records and not everything is obvious without pulling stuff apart. Happily the guy who assembled the engine had kept reasonable records, so we now know the final spec is: Bottom end: Standard block and crank Ross 86.5mm forgies, 9:1 compression Spool forged rods Standard main bolts Oil pump Spool billet gears in standard housing Aeroflow extended and baffled sump Head Freshly rebuilt standard head with new 80lb valve springs Mild porting/port match Head oil feed restrictor VCT disabled Tighe 805C reground cams (255 duration, 8.93 lift)  Adjustable cam gears on inlet/exhaust Standard head bolts, gasket not confirmed but assumed MLS External 555cc Nismo injectors Z32 AFM Bosch 023 Intank fuel pump Garret 2871 (factory housings and manifold) Hypertune FFP plenum with standard throttle   Time to book in a trip to Unigroup
    • I forgot about my shiny new plates!
    • Well, apparently they do fit, however this wont be a problem if not because the car will be stationary while i do the suspension work. I was just going to use the 16's to roll the old girl around if I needed to. I just need to get the E90 back on the road first. Yes! I'm a believer! 🙌 So, I contacted them because the site kinda sucks and I was really confused about what I'd need. They put together a package for me and because I was spraying all the seat surfaces and not doing spot fixes I decided not to send them a headrest to colour match, I just used their colour on file (and it was spot on).  I got some heavy duty cleaner, 1L of colour, a small bottle of dye hardener and a small bottle of the dye top coat. I also got a spray gun as I needed a larger nozzle than the gun I had and it was only $40 extra. From memory the total was ~$450 ish. Its not cheap but the result is awesome. They did add repair bits and pieces to the quote originally and the cost came down significantly when I said I didn't need any repair products. I did it over a weekend. The only issues I had were my own; I forgot to mix the hardener into the dye two coats but I had enough dye for 2 more coats with the hardener. I also just used up all the dye because why not and i rushed the last coat which gave me some runs. Thankfully the runs are under the headrests. The gun pattern wasn't great, very round and would have been better if it was a line. It made it a little tricky to get consistent coverage and I think having done the extra coats probably helped conceal any coverage issues. I contacted them again a few months later so I could get our X5 done (who the f**k thought white leather was a good idea for a family car?!) and they said they had some training to do in Sydney and I could get a reduced rate on the leather fix in the X5 if I let them demo their product on our car. So I agreed. When I took Bec in the E39 to pick it up, I showed them the job I'd done in my car and they were all (students included) really impressed. Note that they said the runs I created could be fixed easily at the time with a brush or an air compressor gun. So, now with the two cars done I can absolutely recommend Colourlock.  I'll take pics of both interiors and create a new thread.
    • Power is fed to the ECU when the ignition switch is switched to IGN, at terminal 58. That same wire also connects to the ECCS relay to provide both the coil power and the contact side. When the ECU sees power at 58 it switches 16 to earth, which pulls the ECCS relay on, which feeds main power into the ECU and also to a bunch of other things. None of this is directly involved in the fuel pump - it just has to happen first. The ECU will pull terminal 18 to earth when it wants the fuel pump to run. This allows the fuel pump relay to pull in, which switches power on into the rest of the fuel pump control equipment. The fuel pump control regulator is controlled from terminal 104 on the ECU and is switched high or low depending on whether the ECU thinks the pump needs to run high or low. (I don't know which way around that is, and it really doesn't matter right now). The fuel pump control reg is really just a resistor that controls how the power through the pump goes to earth. Either straight to earth, or via the resistor. This part doesn't matter much to us today. The power to the fuel pump relay comes from one of the switched wires from the IGN switch and fusebox that is not shown off to the left of this page. That power runs the fuel pump relay coil and a number of other engine peripherals. Those peripherals don't really matter. All that matters is that there should be power available at the relay when the key is in the right position. At least - I think it's switched. If it's not switched, then power will be there all the time. Either way, if you don't have power there when you need it (ie, key on) then it won't work. The input-output switching side of the relay gains its power from a line similar (but not the same as) the one that feeds the ECU. SO I presume that is switched. Again, if there is not power there when you need it, then you have to look upstream. And... the upshot of all that? There is no "ground" at the fuel pump relay. Where you say: and say that pin 1 Black/Pink is ground, that is not true. The ECU trigger is AF73, is black/pink, and is the "ground". When the ECU says it is. The Blue/White wire is the "constant" 12V to power the relay's coil. And when I say "constant", I mean it may well only be on when the key is on. As I said above. So, when the ECU says not to be running the pump (which is any time after about 3s of switching on, with no crank signal or engine speed yet), then you should see 12V at both 1 and 2. Because the 12V will be all the way up to the ECU terminal 18, waiting to be switched to ground. When the ECU switches the fuel pump on, then AF73 should go to ~0V, having been switched to ground and the voltage drop now occurring over the relay coil. 3 & 5 are easy. 5 is the other "constant" 12V, that may or may not be constant but will very much want to be there when the key is on. Same as above. 3 goes to the pump. There should never be 12V visible at 3 unless the relay is pulled in. As to where the immobiliser might have been spliced into all this.... It will either have to be on wire AF70 or AF71, whichever is most accessible near the alarm. Given that all those wires run from the engine bay fusebox or the ECU, via the driver's area to the rear of the car, it could really be either. AF70 will be the same colour from the appropriate fuse all the way to the pump. If it has been cut and is dangling, you should be able to see that  in that area somewhere. Same with AF71.   You really should be able to force the pump to run. Just jump 12V onto AF72 and it should go. That will prove that the pump itself is willing to go along with you when you sort out the upstream. You really should be able to force the fuel pump relay on. Just short AF73 to earth when the key is on. If the pump runs, then the relay is fine, and all the power up to both inputs on the relay is fine. If it doesn't run (and given that you checked the relay itself actually works) then one or both of AF70 and AF71 are not bringing power to the game.
×
×
  • Create New...