Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Ok so, my car is shit, that's a good start.

but seriously

I always road tune my car, just do it myself with the data logit package etc.

Thought, hey why not throw it on the dyno and have a quick look at where i am at.

I'm about to upgrade the exhaust and thought it would be interesting to see what difference is made and was thinking of helping out this site with some real world data etc.

my car ......

R32 GTR

R33 rb26 stock bottom end

JUN 264 9.7mm

700cc sards

z32 AFM's stock airbox, KnN panel

2860-5's

exhaust is...

HKS copy dumps

some no name s/s front pipe 63mm x 2 into 3"

3" decat

HKS super dragger

The dyno i used is a Dyno Dynamics with latest software etc, owned privately.

The owner has tuned a few cars but, he left me to my own to use his dyno etc and just go for it.:teehee:

This is great for me, because i love playing with this sort of stuff etc. Not awsome for when i would like support.

When i went i hadn't slept for 23 hours, because of night shift, yep, shit idea, so i really wasn't on the ball on the day either, :wacko:

any way, results....

Top graph boost and tourqe

bottom kw and AF

dont laugh......

IMG_0478.jpg

IMG_0477.jpg

Edited by blue_vl_t
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/380762-my-laughable-dyno-results/
Share on other sites

  • Replies 48
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

You think so?

I was thinking i was running 1.5 bar, i have a 1.5 bar gauge and upped the boost until i thought it was at the top of the gauge,

so was quite shocked to see what his dyno had to say, assuming i was running 22 psi max, i assume his sensor is reading ok???

I will fit a better gauge soon anyway to see for sure.

I really think the top of the graph is really flat.

perhaps indicating an exhaust upgrade, which i will be doing regardless.

one other thing i was thinking, with the stock air box, i only run the stock air feed, i will remove the 'chamber' from the botom of the box to see if the extra 3" hole makes much difference.

really looks like a restriction to me, the power just rises and stops dead, then flat lines......

I have my theories, but i'm keen to see what people think if could be

I have some HPI 3" dumps and twin 3" into 4" system to go on, just needs a few more bit modified etc. should be soon

Also i do have some cam gears, but not fitted, mostly because they are ebay ones, and i'm unsure if i should trust them???

true, i only have a cheap ass turbotech valve on it too.

Before a retest i will

remove the chamber from the air box

install a EBC, probably Profec B 2

install the new exhaust.

Triple check the cam timing and base ignition timing.

funny thing is, with any more than 14 degrees of timing the power seemed to drop, unless the heat soak make s a huge difference??

Ahh the joy of learning :laugh:

It also looks a bit lazy onto boost... I know -5s aren't exactly punchy on a 2.6L but surely you should be hitting 20psi a bit earlier than that?

I was thinking this also, "big" (lol) rush of power seems very close to 5000rpm on the street :unsure:

Edited by blue_vl_t

Ill bet with the new exhaust you will be able to run a heap more timing and pick up some response to boot.

lets hope so.

I really wanted to do a before/after test, will be good for me and the forum, if it makes the difference to push power over 350rwkw where it should be i will be quite shocked!!!

true, i only have a cheap ass turbotech valve on it too.

Im just running off actuators and a bleed, on much sooner than you are :)

Fix the exhaust, also check the cams are correctly dialled in, that can often be a problem.

Get 20psi holding rather than falling away to 15psi and you'll be right.

Im just running off actuators and a bleed, on much sooner than you are :)

Fix the exhaust, also check the cams are correctly dialled in, that can often be a problem.

Get 20psi holding rather than falling away to 15psi and you'll be right.

on the top graph, the boost is dropping from 27 to 25 psi, fairly sure thats right.............

Oh yes indeed, looking from my phone again, i should stop doing that :(

The boost graph is even lazier then than i thought now im looking from my PC.

Definately exhaust and get the boost control sorted so it comes on much earlier like it should. It still could indeed be the cams not dialled in correctly too.

on the top graph, the boost is dropping from 27 to 25 psi, fairly sure thats right.............

No thats wrong, thats your torque. Notice it starts way off the charts for what you could consider vacuum? Whereas the other one is accurate for what you expect.

Your boost is hitting 20 and bleeding down to 15.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I thought that might be the case, thats what I'll start saving for. Thanks for the info 
    • Ps i found the below forum and it seems to be the same scenario Im dealing with. Going to check my ECU coolant temp wire tomorrow    From NICOclub forum: s1 RB25det flooding at start up Thu Apr 11, 2013 7:23 am I am completely lost on this. Car ran perfectly fine when I parked it at the end of the year. I took the engine out and painted the engine bay, and put a fuel cell with an inline walbro 255 instead of the in tank unit I had last year. After reinstalling everything, the engine floods when the fuel pump primes. if i pull the fuel pump fuse it'll start, and as soon as I put the fuse back in it starts running ridiculously rich. I checked the tps voltage, and its fine. Cleaned the maf as it had some dust from sitting on a shelf all winter, fuel pressure is correct while running, but wont fire until there is less than 5psi in the lines. The fuel lines are run correctly. I have found a few threads with the same problem but no actual explanation of what fixed it, the threads just ended. Any help would be appreciated. Rb25det s1 walbro255 fuel pump nismo fpr holset hx35 turbo fmic 3" exhaust freddy intake manifold q45tb q45 maf   Re: s1 RB25det flooding at start up Fri Apr 12, 2013 5:07 am No, I didn't. I found the problem though. There was a break in one of the ecu coolant temp sensor wires. Once it was repaired it fired right up with no problems. I would have never thought a non working coolant temp sensor would have caused such an issue.
    • Hi sorry late reply I didnt get a chance to take any pics (my mechanics on the other side of the city) but the plugs were fouled from being too rich. I noticed the MAF wasn't genuine, so I replaced it with a genuine green label unit. I also swapped in a different ignitor, but the issue remains. I've narrowed it down a bit now: - If I unplug and reconnect the fuel lines and install fresh spark plugs, the car starts right up and runs perfectly. Took it around the block with no issues - As soon as I shut it off and try to restart, it won't start again - Fuel pressure while cranking is steady around 40 psi, injectors have good spray, return line is clear, and the FPR vacuum is working. It just seems like it's getting flooded after the first start I unplugged coolant sensors to see if its related to ECU flooding but that didnt make a difference. Im thinking its related to this because this issue only started happening after fixing coolant leaks and replacing the bottom part of the stock manifolds coolant pipe. My mechanic took off the inlet to get to get to do these repairs. My mechanics actually just an old mate who's retired now so ill be taking it to a different mechanic who i know has exp with RBs to see if they find anything. If you have any ideas please send em lll give it a try. Ive tried other things like swapping the injectors, fuel rail, different fuel pressure regs, different ignitor, spark plugs, comp test and MAF but the same issue persists.
    • My return flow is custom and puts the return behind the reo, instead of at the bottom. All my core is in the air flow, rather than losing some of it up behind the reo. I realise that the core really acts more as a spiky heatsink than as a constant rate heat exchanger, and that therefore size is important.... but mine fits everything I needed and wanted without having to cut anything, and that's worth something too. And there won't be a hot patch of core up behind the reo after every hit, releasing heat back into the intake air.
    • There is a really fun solution to this problem, buy a Haltech (or ECU of your choice) and put the MAF in the bin.  I'm assuming your going to want more power in future, so you'll need to get the ECU at some stage. I'd put the new MAF money towards the new ECU. 
×
×
  • Create New...