Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 65
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

wallystyles, the owner of J-Spec's pet car is his Kakimoto widebody R33... which has the original/full kit (dunno if yours is a copy or not, but you don't have the kakimoto wing that finishes off the kit, and also one of the most expensive n rarer parts). But yeah yours looks damn similar. There's a company owned by or somehow linked to Simon (one of the Autosalon judges and owner of performanceforums) that fits widebody kits to some of the R33's they sell up in QLD, maybe your cars one of theirs.

I'll have my R32 widebody in a month or so too :rofl: what width rims do you have at the back n what tyres do you use. I'm tryin to find 12" wide tyres for the rears but no luck or very very exxy.

Here's a few pics of the original kit...

R33-1.jpg

R33-2.jpg

R33-3.jpg

heres the pics of the kit I'm puttin on...

bn32_f.jpg

bn32_r.jpg

shan u MUST tell me how you are getting a full respray like the the one u've described for sooooooo cheap!!!! tell me damn it! :rofl: Anniversary edition? hmmm, i have no idea what that colour is. got any pics??

oh, i went with J-Spec in the end, paid my deposit last saturday :rofl:

cheers

who said anything about a respray :rofl: hehe you'll see when its done... lol its the way of the future I tell yas.

I know you went with J-Spec, I saw your contract for an R34 sitting on Craig's desk when I went over on Easter Friday... so you didn't just get the plates hey? hehe... lemme know how you go, I'm doin a writeup of importing Narkeh's ceffy, and I'd me more than happy to do yours as well.

Rb25 transplant is on hold... was gonna take the RB20DET out of my old man's ceffy but that's too much hassles.

Widebody kit is definitely still on, its comin from japan in a few weeks, and should be copied and ready to put on a month after... should be ready for MAS Sept :cheers: I can take out the all looks but no go award, if the osman's don't put their yellow bathtub in

Guest INASNT
Rb25 transplant is on hold... was gonna take the RB20DET out of my old man's ceffy but that's too much hassles.

Widebody kit is definitely still on, its comin from japan in a few weeks, and should be copied and ready to put on a month after... should be ready for MAS Sept :P I can take out the all looks but no go award, if the osman's don't put their yellow bathtub in

The famous last word 'should' :D

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • If as it's stalling, the fuel pressure rises, it's saying there's less vacuum in the intake manifold. This is pretty typical of an engine that is slowing down.   While typically is agree it sounds fuel related, it really sounds fuel/air mixture related. Since the whole system has been refurbished, including injectors, pump, etc, it's likely we've altered how well the system is delivering fuel. If someone before you has messed with the IACV because it needed fiddling with as the fuel system was dieing out, we need to readjust it back. Getting things back to factory spec everywhere, is what's going to help the entire system. So if it idles at 400rpm with no IACV, that needs raising. Getting factory air flow back to normal will help us get everything back in spec, and likely help chase down any other issues. Back on IACV, if the base idle (no IACV plugged in) is too far out, it's a lot harder for the ECU to control idle. The IACV duty cycle causes non linear variations in reality. When I've tuned the idle valves in the past, you need to keep it in a relatively narrow window on aftermarket ecus to stop them doing wild dances. It also means if your base idle is too low, the valve needs to open too much, and then the smallest % change ends up being a huge variation.
    • I guess one thing that might be wrong is the manifold pressure.  It is a constant -5.9 and never moves even under 100% throttle and load.  I would expect it to atleast go to 0 correct?  It's doing this with the OEM MAP as well as the ECU vacuum sensor. When trying to tune the base map under load the crosshairs only climb vertically with RPM, but always in the -5.9 column.
    • AHHHH gotchaa, I'll do that once I am home again. I tried doing the harness with the multimeter but it seems the car needed a jump, there was no power when it was in the "ON" position. Not sure if I should use car battery jump starter or if its because the stuff that has been disconnect the car just does send power.
    • As far as I can tell I have everything properly set in the Haltech software for engine size, injector data, all sensors seem to be reporting proper numbers.  If I change any injector details it doesnt run right.    Changing the base map is having the biggest change in response, im not sure how people are saying it doesnt really matter.  I'm guessing under normal conditions the ECU is able to self adjust and keep everything smooth.   Right now my best performance is happening by lowering the base map just enough to where the ECU us doing short term cut of about 45% to reach the target Lambda of 14.7.  That way when I start putting load on it still has high enough fuel map to not be so lean.  After 2500 rpm I raised the base map to what would be really rich at no load, but still helps with the lean spots on load.  I figure I don't have much reason to be above 2500rpm with no load.  When watching other videos it seems their target is reached much faster than mine.  Mine takes forever to adjust and reach the target. My next few days will be spent making sure timing is good, it was running fine before doing the ECU and DBW swap, but want to verify.  I'll also probably swap in the new injectors I bought as well as a walbro 255 pump.  
    • It would be different if the sealant hadn't started to peel up with gaps in the glue about ~6cm and bigger in some areas. I would much prefer not having to do the work take them off the car . However, the filler the owner put in the roof rack mount cavities has shrunk and begun to crack on the rail delete panels. I cant trust that to hold off moisture ingress especially where I live. Not only that but I have faded paint on as well as on either side of these panels, so they would need to come off to give the roofline a proper respray. My goal is to get in there and put a healthy amount of epoxy instead of panel filler/bog and potentially skin with carbon fiber. I have 2 spare rolls from an old motorcycle fairing project from a few years back and I think it'd be a nice touch on a black stag.  I've seen some threads where people replace their roof rack delete with a welded in sheet metal part. But has anyone re-worked the roof rails themselves? It seems like there is a lot of volume there to add in some threads and maybe a keyway for a quick(er) release roof rack system. Not afraid to mill something out if I have to. It would be cool to have a cross bar only setup. That way I can keep the sleek roofline that would accept a couple bolts to gain back that extra utility  3D print some snazzy covers to hide the threaded section to be thorough and keep things covered when not using the rack. 
×
×
  • Create New...