Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I have a t78-33d 17cm on a rb25det and would like to get an idea of the expected power output.

It's currently putting out 280rwkw at 18-19psi on a roller dyno. I thought it would be much more, at least 300-350??

Anyway, specs are as follows.

T78

rb25 highflowed injectors

stainless highmount exhaust manifold

50mm hks copy wastegate. (not plumbed in)

3" exhaust

link g3 ecu

stock inlet manifold

2.5" intercooler piping

china FMIC

stock rb25det block with stock rb25de head

stock nissan headgasket

oil cooler

AFR's on boost are around 11.5 with 10* timing up top.

I will get the dyno sheets and post them up soon.

Thanks in advance.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/382814-t78-rb25det/
Share on other sites

Yea I think so, maybe a 4" exhaust and 22psi.

The engine is just a slapper with parts we had lying around.

From memory the torque drops off pretty hard after peak @ about 5.5k, like there is a great restriction. I thought with the big turbo the torque should be able to hold a bit longer than it does. It won't take much timing though (probably another sign of a restriction) or maybe the DE head has raised the CR to much. -switch it to E85?

Edited by r31 25t
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/382814-t78-rb25det/#findComment-6106716
Share on other sites

This should give you an idea, stock internal 1JZ with 264 cams...this car hasn't backed it up on the strip so i'm not sure how genuine those 640 horses are (dynojet reads a bit higher than a Dyno Dynamics dyno) at 24psi...but should be high 500's out here on a DD roller

Edit to add - 1JZs have smaller ports and half a point less compression than an Rb25det and tend to need a couple more psi in the intake to make the same power using the same turbo.

So I would think that 600hp is there for the taking with a big (4") exhaust a good cooler and a good tuner on E85

  • Like 1
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/382814-t78-rb25det/#findComment-6106920
Share on other sites

I've seen that video before, and there is a write up on the car here supra t78.

The intercooler and exhaust piping sizes are the same as mine according to the posts on the above forum link, but like you say its being run on a dynojet.

Also running the wastegate plumbed out is effectively like having a bigger exhaust so that should help a little?

I may of found the problem, on a closer review of the dyno sheets I've noticed the there is some slippage when the turbo ramps onto boost, whether it's the tyres or the clutch, I'm not sure. - This is probably where the power is being lost, the engine maybe making an extra 20kw of smoke from the clutch or tyres. I'll have to pay more attention next time it's on the rollers.

I'm off to the shed, so will get those sheets posted up today. - no laughing please!! this may be the most inefficient way to make 280kw.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/382814-t78-rb25det/#findComment-6107172
Share on other sites

Change the piping to 3"

Use a larger intercooler

Get rid of the bov

Use a good one

A twin scroll type turbo manifold

Yes 100mm is a good idea if you can flow power

I'm running a rb25 t78-33d with 270-272 camshaft set up

I'm at 400hp at 10psi 100mm straight pipe with a vibrant 100mm muffler port and polish etc.

Been running for 3yrs + no problems

If you have any question just pm me

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/382814-t78-rb25det/#findComment-6107591
Share on other sites

Power and torque are in kw and nm and I can't remember how I scaled the knock.

KW NM AFR

post-45622-0-16679000-1321169498_thumb.jpg

KW NM MAP

post-45622-0-13422000-1321169629_thumb.jpg

KW NM Knock

post-45622-0-69326300-1321169707_thumb.jpg

I'm still working the bugs out on the dyno too which doesn't help much.

I put a tilton triple in it the car today and it feels way more savage to drive.

Didn't get enough time to put it on the dyno though so not sure if it's transferring more power.

Any way don't laugh to hard.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/382814-t78-rb25det/#findComment-6107782
Share on other sites

Yea I think so, maybe a 4" exhaust and 22psi.

The engine is just a slapper with parts we had lying around.

From memory the torque drops off pretty hard after peak @ about 5.5k, like there is a great restriction. I thought with the big turbo the torque should be able to hold a bit longer than it does. It won't take much timing though (probably another sign of a restriction) or maybe the DE head has raised the CR to much. -switch it to E85?

Why only 22psi? Just keep screwing more in until it stops making power or you run into detonation issues.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/382814-t78-rb25det/#findComment-6108066
Share on other sites

Why only 22psi? Just keep screwing more in until it stops making power or you run into detonation issues.

I know what your saying but if the torque is falling away that much with such a large turbo then surely something is restricting things. Would be worth pumping up the boost to see if it overcomes the issue or it gets worse as a test.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/382814-t78-rb25det/#findComment-6108746
Share on other sites

I know what your saying but if the torque is falling away that much with such a large turbo then surely something is restricting things. Would be worth pumping up the boost to see if it overcomes the issue or it gets worse as a test.

Yeah fix the problems first, I just thought that was your goal once it was all running properly.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/382814-t78-rb25det/#findComment-6109062
Share on other sites

Firstly I applaud your efforts and your attitude mate, good on you for trying to nut this out.

My question is: Is the manifold twin or single scroll and is the turbine housing twin or single scroll?

I have found poorly matched flanges to the head/turbo/dumps/cats ETC ETC to cause enormous restrictions like what you are seeing. It is a lot of flow and a little bit of turbulence would be exponentially worse for its power making ability as the flow climbs.

Check this out and make sure everything is nicely matching up. See if your manifold has carbon deposits on the flanges indicating a poor flow path ETC.

Also, and perhaps more importantly, I have come across another RB slapper recently that had the exhaust cam out by 1 tooth... It just did not want to make the same power it did before because it was ingesting exhaust gas once the boost came on and killing off its spark ability. Make sure the cams you are running are in spect with the belt/camgears you are using and its all timed up 100%

  • Like 1
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/382814-t78-rb25det/#findComment-6109111
Share on other sites

Why only 22psi? Just keep screwing more in until it stops making power or you run into detonation issues.

The main reason is the G3's internal map sensor is only limited to around that boost and I'm to tight/lazy to buy another one and wire it in, and to be honest it should be more, the numbers are indicating a problem.

johnnilicte[/color]' date='14 November 2011 - 11:35am' post='1735291']

What duration cams are you running?

Factory r33 rb25de cylinder head and camshafts I=240* E=240* 7.8mm lift Same cams as the rb25det according to the tomei website.

I think the head has bumped the CR up a bit - needs to be tested.

GTScotT[/color]' date='14 November 2011 - 04:19pm' post='1735291']

Firstly I applaud your efforts and your attitude mate, good on you for trying to nut this out.

My question is: Is the manifold twin or single scroll and is the turbine housing twin or single scroll?

I have found poorly matched flanges to the head/turbo/dumps/cats ETC ETC to cause enormous restrictions like what you are seeing. It is a lot of flow and a little bit of turbulence would be exponentially worse for its power making ability as the flow climbs.

Check this out and make sure everything is nicely matching up. See if your manifold has carbon deposits on the flanges indicating a poor flow path ETC.

Also, and perhaps more importantly, I have come across another RB slapper recently that had the exhaust cam out by 1 tooth... It just did not want to make the same power it did before because it was ingesting exhaust gas once the boost came on and killing off its spark ability. Make sure the cams you are running are in spect with the belt/camgears you are using and its all timed up 100%

Thanks mate.

The manifold is definitely a twinscroll, not to sure how well it lines up with the turbo flange, will have to check that to.

Timing is spot on.

I think all going to plan, I'll have it back on the rollers next saturday with a dump pipe only. - It's gunna be loud, but hopefully it makes the numbers.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/382814-t78-rb25det/#findComment-6109613
Share on other sites

Twin scroll with be best.

I run a single scroll equal length love fab turbo header with a tial 60mm wg.

Spool test was at .7 bar no boost controller.

Results was:

5 psi at 3,200 rpm

10 psi at 4,300 rpm

Which was fool boost

We set our rev limit to 5,000 rpm

Which was hitting rev limit at 4,800rpm

You can check out Kelford camshafts

They use a lower lift but the same duration as my tomei.

Mine is 10.25 both camshafts

They do help spool

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/382814-t78-rb25det/#findComment-6110424
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I hadn't thought about the variable power steering assist. Presumably, it will always be the same level of assist as you get in an S14. The R32/3/4 are either helliishly heavy (at low speeds) if the solenoid is not powered at all, or hellishly too light (at high speed) if it is powered all the time. I presume that it is PWM controlled on those cars. I hadn't thought about the S cars not having variable assist. ugh. What crappy plebby cars they must be!  
    • Hmm yeah that is a good point. It looks like it'll just bolt in with no real issue besides maybe the bushings being different. My other concern was that 2 pin plug that I assume is used in some way to control the rack solenoid depending on the speed signal from the ecu. The DMAX rack doesn't even have that plug though so, don't think it'll matter. Might just order the rack and see how it goes. Will update this when I figure something out
    • I'd say it's a fair bet that the feed and return fluid lines will be in different enough spots that you would need to come up with a way to cut the originals short and adapt with new hard line adaption or braided teflon hoses or somesuch. But really, you have the car, you have the photos of the DMAX rack - you should be able to go out there and see for yourself whether they're in the same or different spots.
    • I've been doing some looking around and honestly was just considering throwing a new rack at it. I saw that the dmax silvia rack bolts up into the 33 with the silvia bushings but not sure if the high pressure lines will sit in the correct spot. I believe other version of the 33 rack are the same/similar to the racks that can be opened up without as much fuss so I assume the dmax rack would fit but any ideas?
    • I've never played with one, but I would expect that you are correct. That slot looks like it is intended to be used to unscrew the end, and the flats on the body would be better than grabbing it around the round bit with a pipe wrench. So, yeah, probably unscrews. You'll probably have to make a tool to drive in that slot.
×
×
  • Create New...