Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 125
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

hey guys i didnt want to start a new thread for one question so while we are on topic of ecu's my ecu has wasted spark feature what is wasted spark and whats its good for

Oh come on, what about google!?

I'll throw you a bone though. Wasted spark means the spark plugs fire in pairs. So one sparks during the compression stroke and the other sparks during the exhaust stroke. That spark during the exhaust stroke does nothing though, hence 'wasted'. The benefits of this is that you can halve the number of ignition components that you need, so on a 6-cylinder car you can use 3 coils, etc.

after many hours reading and downloading / playing with all the software etc

I have narrowed it down to 2 ECU,s

The Haltech PS2000 or the Adaptronic E1280

Both are around the 2k mark, So double what I originally wanted to pay, they both have cheaper options at a bit over $1k, so I have to decide if I really want sequential injection and ignition.

The decision for either of these came down to both the ease of use with the software (not saying the others are hard) and they can both be tuned via Speed Density.

Which for me doing the tuning myself makes it much simpler, I still think the Haltech software is the easiest/best laid out to use between the 2.

So we shall see

Edit - wait a min!!!! I disregarded the sprint 500 for its lack of big enough on board map sensor...just found out an external one can be fitted.

This changes everything!

Can now get an ecu under $1000 that also does VE/Speed density tuning!

Volumetric efficiency - you tell the ECU a target A/F ratio, engine size, the approx VE and injector size, it works out how much fuel to squirt.

then adjust the VE to get the fueling spot on

Pretty much means you can guestimate the VE to get the car started and mobile, then adjust from there, instead of working out injector pulse times

I'm sure someone will know more than me, but it is how they tune both R35's and LSx V8s with flash tunes

G4 Link ECUs can be configured to similar effect - not quite as refined as that, but still a lot nicer than just having an outright pulsewidth table.

Firstly, the fuel tables when using MAP as the load value actually are mapped relative to atmospheric – so you effectively are mapping all load zones as though they are at “sea level” atmospheric pressure, then the ECU calculates up or down based on what the load line actually is. If you see a G4 Link fuel table with numbers roughly twice as big around the 200kpa load zones as at 100kpa, then there are probably quite serious issues with the tune.

Secondly, there is a mode called “Open Loop Fuel” or something like that (I don’t have the Link software in front of me) which when enabled – does a similar type of offsetting, but this time it treats ALL fuel values as though you have tuned the entire map to suit stoich. The ECU then refers to the “Target AFR” table which is normally used for self tune and closed loop lambda to scale the numbers up or down to suit the actual target AFR you require for that load cell.

Sure, its not as nice as speed density tuning but really to me the main benefit for SD tuning, and this for that matter – is that you don’t have a map which is “all over the place” due to required pulsewidths going up in non-linear fashions due to load and AFR targets. Makes mapping that much easier, and you’re going to have to piss around with the base numbers a bit at various load levels regardless to get them running nicely.

Cheers. Do you happen to have a g4 map for me to look at? Doesn't matter what motor.

The SD factor just appeals to me because I decide to wire in an ecu I would need to easily get it running and do the low load points quickly

No doubt full throttle isn't all that much different between SD and inj pulse to get right

I do hear good things about going from a pulp tune to e85

Change the target afr and off you go. Or the adaptronic let's you change the lambda figure and go

Cheers. Do you happen to have a g4 map for me to look at? Doesn't matter what motor.

I might have a nosy later and see if there is anything I feel like sharing, as I use that mode in all the G4 tuning I've do - as well as other fun things you might find interesting such as switching fuel and ignition maps in real time (on VTEC Hondas) etc. Fwiw when you download the G4 software you get a bunch of sample maps anyway - SOME of those have the open loop fuel mode enabled as is.

The SD factor just appeals to me because I decide to wire in an ecu I would need to easily get it running and do the low load points quickly

No doubt full throttle isn't all that much different between SD and inj pulse to get right

Can't really comment as I've not done an SD car yet, though the G4 cars I've done have typically taken similar or more time to get other configuration bits sorted (that aren't specifically fuel table related - ie, cold start/accel enrichment etc) than to actually get the car running and driveable.

I do hear good things about going from a pulp tune to e85

Change the target afr and off you go. Or the adaptronic let's you change the lambda figure and go

Same would apply for the G4 with the method I described of course, with the added advantage that (providing you configure the O2 sensor setup correctly) it also has support for using input Flexifuel sensors for fuel and ignition trim ;)

Ye, I do really like the Link/Vi-Pec ecus.

not a huge fan of teh software, PC-Link is better than the vipec despite been 99% the same

Im sure that is more to do with me playing with every available ECU software that is out there lol

The Adaptronic software is fine on a 19" monitor...not sure how it would go on a little note book though....too many small tabs to click on

Yeah thats the puppy i want...tempted to palm of my PFC for one... :thumbsup:

Its the one HG sells with the turbos isnt it..Is there a plugin loom for skylines?

or is it this one im thinking of

http://adaptronic.com.au/products/selectpnp.html

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • The rain is the best time to push to the edge of the grip limit. Water lubrication reduces the consumption of rubber without reducing the fun. I take pleasure in driving around the outside of numpties in Audis, WRXs, BRZs, etc, because they get all worried in the wet. They warm up faster than the engine oil does.
    • When they're dead cold, and in the wet, they're not very fun. RE003 are alright, they do harden very quickly and turn into literally $50 Pace tyres.
    • Yeah, I thought that Reedy's video was quite good because he compared old and new (as in, well used and quite new) AD09s, with what is generally considered to be the fast Yokohama in this category (ie, sporty road/track tyres) and a tyre that people might be able to use to extend the comparo out into the space of more expensive European tyres, being the Cup 2. No-one would ever agree that the Cup 2 is a poor tyre - many would suggest that it is close to the very top of the category. And, for them all to come out so close to each other, and for the cheaper tyre in the test to do so well against the others, in some cases being even faster, shows that (good, non-linglong) tyres are reaching a plateau in terms of how good they can get, and they're all sitting on that same plateau. Anyway, on the AD08R, AD09, RS4 that I've had on the car in recent years, I've never had a problem in the cold and wet. SA gets down to 0-10°C in winter. Not so often, but it was only 4°C when I got in the car this morning. Once the tyres are warm (ie, after about 2km), you can start to lay into them. I've never aquaplaned or suffered serious off-corner understeer or anything like that in the wet, that I would not have expected to happen with a more normal tyre. I had some RE003s, and they were shit in the dry, shit in the wet, shit everywhere. I would rate the RS4 and AD0x as being more trustworthy in the wet, once the rubber is warm. Bridgestone should be ashamed of the RE003.
    • This is why I gave the disclaimer about how I drive in the wet which I feel is pretty important. I have heard people think RS4's are horrible in the rain, but I have this feeling they must be driving (or attempting to drive) anywhere close to the grip limit. I legitimately drive at the speed limit/below speed the limit 100% of the time in the rain. More than happy to just commute along at 50kmh behind a train of cars in 5th gear etc. I do agree with you with regards to the temp and the 'quality' of the tyre Dose. Most UHP tyres aren't even up to temperature on the road anyway, even when going mad initial D canyon carving. It would be interesting to see a not-up-to-temp UHP tyre compared against a mere... normal...HP tyre at these temperatures. I don't think you're (or me in this case) is actually picking up grip with an RS4/AD09 on the road relative to something like a RE003 because the RS4/AD09 is not up to temp and the RE003 is closer to it's optimal operating window.
    • Either the bearing has been installed backwards OR the gearbox input shaft bearing is loosey goosey.   When in doubt, just put in a Samsonas in.
×
×
  • Create New...