Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 125
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Ye, I do really like the Link/Vi-Pec ecus.

not a huge fan of teh software, PC-Link is better than the vipec despite been 99% the same

Im sure that is more to do with me playing with every available ECU software that is out there lol

The Adaptronic software is fine on a 19" monitor...not sure how it would go on a little note book though....too many small tabs to click on

I do alot of adaptronics and the only let down is certain parts of the software, its uber clunky to use and takes forever to adjust things like cold start and temp compensations, its all individual figures not a whole table as such.

The fuel and ign tables ae super effiecent to tune though and very user friendly. (if your reading guys take it as constructive critisim :P )

great product.

  • 4 months later...

long time between drinks

seriously considering the sprint 500

Im not going to need 11ty inputs/outputs on a 220rwkw Supra

IS basic enough that I think I'll be able to get it setup and driving easily enough

I was set on a more advanced ECU (the Wolf V500) but considering it would cost half as much I paid for the car, it just isnt worth it to me, this car is gonna be relegated to the ocasional Sunday drive and as a learning tool for me

So having a heap of features I'll never make use of is pointless, i.e No point having gearbased boost/traction control when it doesnt break traction.

Found out I dont need an ECu that will control an Auto (the MV autos box thing does that) but it would be nice....though no local tuners know how to do it lol

So If I ever make the move back to QLD I'll buy the Wolf and you can go nuts Dan lol

But for now, basic stuff is fine

long time between drinks

seriously considering the sprint 500

Im not going to need 11ty inputs/outputs on a 220rwkw Supra

IS basic enough that I think I'll be able to get it setup and driving easily enough

I was set on a more advanced ECU (the Wolf V500) but considering it would cost half as much I paid for the car, it just isnt worth it to me, this car is gonna be relegated to the ocasional Sunday drive and as a learning tool for me

So having a heap of features I'll never make use of is pointless, i.e No point having gearbased boost/traction control when it doesnt break traction.

Found out I dont need an ECu that will control an Auto (the MV autos box thing does that) but it would be nice....though no local tuners know how to do it lol

So If I ever make the move back to QLD I'll buy the Wolf and you can go nuts Dan lol

But for now, basic stuff is fine

That's what it's all about mate, picking the one that's right for your application, not always the one that has the most features. Especially if you're working on a budget and for others, they would need to consider who around them can tune the ECU they choose.

Let us know how the Sprint goes

Thanks Dan :D

I should clarify that the MV shift box doesnt do "drive" and shift by itself, but stops the auto having a heart attack if the Trans computer is pulled

So I'll chuck a B&M or Hurst shifter at it so I can pretend its an R35 lol

Shouldn't any tuner worth his weight be able to tune anything..

I mean, at the end of the day all ecus perform the same basic function don't they..

Is a tuners dislike for a certain ecu an indication that the ecu is a dud or just they can't be bothered to learn it..

For instance I know if Trent told me an ecu was crap I would take his word for it because the man can and will tune anything and is always up for a challenge..but then I hear some guys who's tuner gives them a list of say pfc,link,vipec and says don't bother with anything else..

Meanwhile alot of alternative systems get a bad rep when it seems to me like its just laziness on the tuners part. I would think that any decent tuner would love it if somebody came into their shop with a new system to try and if they don't, well personally I would prefer not to have someone like that tuning my car..I dunno maybe I'm just spoilt for choice or just missing the bigger picture..

End :rant:

I think a lot of it comes down to personal preference and History with that Brand

No different to me liking Toyotas and Fords

where some might like Holden and Nissan

I wouldnt own another Rb25 because of the history of Issues I had with mine

Shouldn't any tuner worth his weight be able to tune anything..

I mean, at the end of the day all ecus perform the same basic function don't they..

Is a tuners dislike for a certain ecu an indication that the ecu is a dud or just they can't be bothered to learn it..

For instance I know if Trent told me an ecu was crap I would take his word for it because the man can and will tune anything and is always up for a challenge..but then I hear some guys who's tuner gives them a list of say pfc,link,vipec and says don't bother with anything else..

Meanwhile alot of alternative systems get a bad rep when it seems to me like its just laziness on the tuners part, personally I would prefer not to have someone like that tuning my car..I dunno maybe I'm just spoilt for choice or just missing the bigger picture..

End :rant:

In my tuners case, he is happy to have a go at tuning whatever I bring him, he just makes it clear that I may not get the results I'm expecting compared to if I went with an ECU he was experienced with. Personally I just don't see the point in giving my tuner an ECU that he hasn't tuned before when it's the tune that is going to make the difference.

At the moment I'm saving to switch to a ViPEC/Link as I feel the NIStune just isn't happy in my car, I've had way too many problems with the stock ECU so far. My tuner thinks he can get me more power and a better curve with a ViPEC, so I'll be happy to give it a go when I can afford it.

Get knocked down get back up again man..

  I have never had a single issue with mine Zeb .

It has sat in a shed for years and started first kick..its jumped gutters, hit a concrete wall and been wrapped around a pole.I have pulled it to pieces with my limited knowledge and put it together with different bits and still it has never missed a beat..

Everytime I drive it I am expecting something to wrong, but it never does..I love my skyline :D 

That last bit I dont fully understand

20deg of ingition timing on one ECU is the same as 20deg on any other ECU right?

so I dont see how one can make more power than another

Because mine won't hold the timing. The stock ECU keeps freaking out, pulling timing on random occasions. I have a very random misfire at ~5000rpm which is when the ECU decides to pull timing. The ViPEC wouldn't do it.

Now I've got this whole corrupt ECU thing... I dunno. Too many problems. I haven't managed a single tune yet, in the 2 years my car has been turbocharged, that I haven't had an ECU related problem.

I wouldnt own another Rb25 because of the history of Issues I had with mine

After going through all the trouble modifying my CA18det into 316rwkws region I think the Rb25det is hell of an excellent engine :rolleyes: .

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Who did you have do the installation? I actually know someone who is VERY familiar with the AVS gear. The main point of contact though would be your installer.   Where are you based in NZ?
    • Look, realistically, those are some fairly chunky connectors and wires so it is a reasonably fair bet that that loom was involved in the redirection of the fuel pump and/or ECU/ignition power for the immobiliser. It's also fair to be that the new immobiliser is essentially the same thing as the old one, and so it probably needs the same stuff done to make it do what it has to do. Given that you are talking about a car that no-one else here is familiar with (I mean your exact car) and an alarm that I've never heard of before and so probably not many others are familiar with, and that some wire monkey has been messing with it out of our sight, it seems reasonable that the wire monkey should be fixing this.
    • Wheel alignment immediately. Not "when I get around to it". And further to what Duncan said - you cannot just put camber arms on and shorten them. You will introduce bump steer far in excess of what the car had with stock arms. You need adjustable tension arms and they need to be shortened also. The simplest approach is to shorten them the same % as the stock ones. This will not be correct or optimal, but it will be better than any other guess. The correct way to set the lengths of both arms is to use a properly built/set up bump steer gauge and trial and error the adjustments until you hit the camber you need and want and have minimum bump steer in the range of motion that the wheel is expected to travel. And what Duncan said about toe is also very true. And you cannot change the camber arm without also affecting toe. So when you have adjustable arms on the back of a Skyline, the car either needs to go to a talented wheel aligner (not your local tyre shop dropout), or you need to be able to do this stuff yourself at home. Guess which approach I have taken? I have built my own gear for camber, toe and bump steer measurement and I do all this on the flattest bit of concrete I have, with some shims under the tyres on one side to level the car.
    • Thought I would get some advice from others on this situation.    Relevant info: R33 GTS25t Link G4x ECU Walbro 255LPH w/ OEM FP Relay (No relay mod) Scenario: I accidentally messed up my old AVS S5 (rev.1) at the start of the year and the cars been immobilised. Also the siren BBU has completely failed; so I decided to upgrade it.  I got a newer AVS S5 (rev.2?) installed on Friday. The guy removed the old one and its immobilisers. Tried to start it; the car cranks but doesnt start.  The new one was installed and all the alarm functions seem to be working as they should; still wouldn't start Went to bed; got up on Friday morning and decided to have a look into the no start problem. Found the car completely dead.  Charged the battery; plugged it back in and found the brake lights were stuck on.  Unplugging the brake pedal switch the lights turn off. Plug it back in and theyre stuck on again. I tested the switch (continuity test and resistance); all looks good (0-1kohm).  On talking to AVS; found its because of the rubber stopper on the brake pedal; sure enough the middle of it is missing so have ordered a new one. One of those wear items; which was confusing what was going on However when I try unplugging the STOP Light fuses (under the dash and under the hood) the brake light still stays on. Should those fuses not cut the brake light circuit?  I then checked the ECU; FP Speed Error.  Testing the pump again; I can hear the relay clicking every time I switch it to ON. I unplugged the pump and put the multimeter across the plug. No continuity; im seeing 0.6V (ECU signal?) and when it switches the relay I think its like 20mA or 200mA). Not seeing 12.4V / 7-9A. As far as I know; the Fuel Pump was wired through one of the immobiliser relays on the old alarm.  He pulled some thick gauged harness out with the old alarm wiring; which looks to me like it was to bridge connections into the immobilisers? Before it got immobilised it was running just fine.  Im at a loss to why the FP is getting no voltage; I thought maybe the FP was faulty (even though I havent even done 50km on the new pump) but no voltage at the harness plug.  Questions: Could it be he didnt reconnect the fuel pump when testing it after the old alarm removal (before installing the new alarm)?  Is this a case of bridging to the brake lights instead of the fuel pump circuit? It's a bit beyond me as I dont do a lot with electrical; so have tried my best to diagnose what I think seems to make sense.  Seeking advice if theres for sure an issue with the alarm install to get him back here; or if I do infact, need an auto electrician to diagnose it. 
    • Then, shorten them by 1cm, drop the car back down and have a visual look (or even better, use a spirit level across the wheel to see if you have less camber than before. You still want something like 1.5 for road use. Alternatively, if you have adjustable rear ride height (I assume you do if you have extreme camber wear), raise the suspension back to standard height until you can get it all aligned properly. Finally, keep in mind that wear on the inside of the tyre can be for incorrect toe, not just camber
×
×
  • Create New...