Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 5.5k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

What the hell were RBR thinking? :verymad::domokun: :domokun: :domokun:

Webz had Nando covered....the dires were very conservative this weekend and were never going to fall off the cliff :(

On a side note ... Sally from Home and Away has aged damn well. She used to live in the same complex as a mate when we were young...wish they were still neighbours :)

What the hell were RBR thinking? :verymad::domokun: :domokun: :domokun:

Webz had Nando covered....the dires were very conservative this weekend and were never going to fall off the cliff :(

On a side note ... Sally from Home and Away has aged damn well. She used to live in the same complex as a mate when we were young...wish they were still neighbours :)

Have you seen her in action?

The reason given for the late tyre change was that the diff fault was causing excessive rear tyre wear. But it sounds a bit like a premature call given how well the tyres were holding up generally. Anyway, blaming Mark is a bit unreasonable, his start was brilliant and he went well otherwise.

The reason given for the late tyre change was that the diff fault was causing excessive rear tyre wear. But it sounds a bit like a premature call given how well the tyres were holding up generally. Anyway, blaming Mark is a bit unreasonable, his start was brilliant and he went well otherwise.

is this the start of pegging back mark and letting vetool ahead of the points between them? call me sceptical but the would never let mark finish ahead in the points by the end of the year

Sorry to ruin yet another RBR Webber conspiracy theory with facts, but Webber's last 3 laps before that pit stop were getting consistently slower and the last was 2.2 slower than 3 laps earlier. I don't think they had any choice. They also 3 stopped Vettel 3 laps later and his lap times hadn't even started declining.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I see what you mean on that last paragraph and makes sense. I am leaning towards because I made the repair/filler area large that I didn't use a long enough block. Will minimise the area and let you's know how I go. This is random but I noticed when I put epoxy primer it felt flat but that's just temporary.
    • Tried to repair with filler only. The block is a foam block but quite hard and I put a velcro on it for sandpaper, the hook and loop system. It's not one of those super soft ones that just follow the panel. Similar to a dura block.
    • You need one of those automated sprays that puffs a nice small every 15 minutes in their room. Except swap the nice smell for chloroform...
    • Don't step down power supply size, maintain it the whole way. It's how I'd do it. OR, Id have one feed, with one joint that splits out to six smaller gauge wires that go to each coil. I wouldn't add joins like stepping from 12 to 16, at the first two coils, as if you try to continue that fashion, each joint will introduce a voltage drop. In theory, earths should be the same size as power feeds, however in this case the main power needs to be bigger due to the average size current. So the next question is, how much current do these coils actually need?
    • I think Murray is onto it. It's sounding like either it's a soft block, not long enough block, OR if you're chasing waves, you're going in the direction of the waves, instead of across them. Rotate your sanding pattern by 45 degrees is something to try. You said you're going in an X, so now instead, from the same perspective, do a "t" instead.   If you're not able to have the block sit on top of two high points, and not touch the low point between them, you'll never get it flat.
×
×
  • Create New...