Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi guys, just lookign for some input on my current situation.

My stagea autech had N1 Le mans turbos fitted (rated 640hp), adjustable cam gears, 700 injectors, upgrade fuel pump, greddy profec b boost controller and power fc fitted a few weeks back in Sydney and i was a little dissapointed with the result. It made 251kw at 17 p.s.i but was running on 20" rims on a 34 degree afternoon. On the way home afm's started playing up so have since purchased a set of nismo ones and had them fitted and car re-tuned today and still not happy as i was hoping for and told by nearly every tuner ive spoken to that 300-320kw should be what i'de expect to see.

Car made 265kw with nismo afm's at 17 p.s.i with factory rims back on which i think are 16' maybe?

The tuner couldnt seem to work out what is holding it back but said it was just simply a dud lol.

Tried unbolting the cat thinking it may be the issue but it is a catco highflow cat and unbolting it only made a 6kw difference so its not that.

He also said that with a 3 p.s.i increase to 20 p.s.i in boost it was gaining only 3hp so there is a restriction of some sort somewhere. I've read alot of comments on factory airbox and intercooler being fine for the 300kw target but these are the only 2 things i can think of that havent been changed.

List of current setup is:

Power fc

Nismo N1 GT LeMans group A turbos

xforce dump pipes

2.5 - 3" front pipe

Catco highflow cat

3" mandrel bent exhaust and 3 inch highflow straight through muffler

JJR adjustable cam gears

Walbro intank 255l fuel pump

Nismo afm's

factory intercooler and piping

factory airbox and snorkel with K&N panel filter

Greddy profec B spec 2 boost controller

Any suggestions or comments on whether the power figures seem fairly under performing for these mods or if someone has run into the same situation and what was restricting it?

From what i have researched i should definatly be seeing around the 300+ kw mark and its frustrating me having spent the money buying the parts i thought would get me there to fall a good 40+ kw short.

Edited by livewire
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/384616-rb26dett-with-mods-not-making-power/
Share on other sites

  • Replies 75
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Agreed, about 300 is right for those turbs at 20psi. They are pretty crap unfortunately, you would have 350+ with the same setup running -5 of similar instead (and with less lag).

Dropping the zorst was a good call, and the other stuff like intake, cooler, airbox etc would be fine for that power level.

Are you certain the timing is correct, and what cams does it have? Sure there is no boost leak and that the fuel pressure is OK?

I'd do a double take on the walbro...........get a tomei/bosch/nismo and re try. Also see the FAQ section on using a dedicated earth lead for your pump.

Also try taking your K+N panel out and running without it just to check.

Pic of the dyno sheet please.

What are the cam gears set too?

Are the standard intake pipes sucking closed?

Comp tested the motor?

It's running 8degrees on the inlet and 4degrees on the exhaust.

Engine sounds bloody healthy IMO.

Thats crazy. Try backing the intake off heaps. Maybe 4 and the exh to 2.

Did they play with cam timing?

Not today. I believe the previous mechanic/tuner did last week when the adjustable cam gears were installed.

i'd be looking at comp testing the motor.

or possibly setting the cams back to zero and seeing if it makes any difference?

i had a very similar setup to you appart from using -5's and was making over 300kw @ 17psi

the std intercooler is fine for 350kw and i'm still using std airbox at 365rwkw

youre exhaust sounds to be adequate enough for that power, not too sure about the xforce dumps? i have never used them so can't coment on them?

i would do the following:

set cams back to zero and test

check all piping for leaks

comp test the motor.

hopefully that'll give you a reason why such a low figure

When the CAT was dropped, did that mean the entire exhaust was dropped when the run was done?

Ie - Front pipe ONLY connected?

Agree with the others though, check the cam gears belt etc. Most instances of stock-ish cars not making power is when cam gears are installed and they are out, or incorrectly set etc.

Hmm thanks for the input guys. Can only hope its not to do with compression :-/

The guys yesterday checked the cam gears and and said the 8 degree inlet and 4 degree exhaust isn't out of the ordinary so kinda eliminated that. Will see how a compression test turns out I guess. Otherwise its got me beat

Out of the ordinary and not being set right are often two different things.

Not saying they have got it wrong, but too often people have "double checked", only to take it for a second opinion and bam - in 30mins it's fixed with it being checked again.

Hmm true. Getting compression test done asap anyway to get piece of mind or save going all the way back to Sydney for nothing. If compression test comes back ok then I guess its a matter of dropping it off to a workshop with a lot of experience with them to eliminate possibilities. More f!$king money lol. And no doubt I'm gonna be up for a third tune cost too

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...