Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Ben, you are not doing 70km/h more than them, the cars are less side by side and there is more space. I agree its a similar scenario but not the same situation.

I personally would not have gone for the gap. Granted the Lotus onboard shows there is more space then the other video suggested but it is still damn tight given their closing speed. Anyway...enough to scare me off the track and think another 30 times about doing my OLT and working up to an Intl licence for some paid Enduro drives in FWD pussboxes :)

If you can afford it, do it. Life is short brother!

Granted the speed difference is substantial, but I reckon it's still 40klm/h and I think the camera makes it appear as if there's more room than there actually was when the pass was actually made. I also reckon the time spent in the "danger zone" by the Lotus was less.

Anyways, a non issue for me :) I'd just like to have a punt in that Lotus!

Edited by Marlin

suggestion on that thread is more like 70klm/h difference and for me enough to shit my pants. Doubt i would have seen him coming because of the difference in speed and the first time you would see him was as you come onto the straight.

I agree though if i could get a drive of the lotus i would not pass it up :)

the gap's the same size regardles of the speed differential.

Lotus driver knows they were told in drivers' breifing to hold their line to let fast cars through, and knows they're alerted to the faster cars coming thanks to the Lambo blowing their doors off on the previous corner. And really there's very little risk of one of them making a sudden move to close that gap - absolutely no reason to do that. So I don't see any problem with it at all. Its racing - you sign up for passing and being passed. Don't expect the fast cars to park behind you on the straights until you wake up.

Besides, the slower cars would be well aware they're sharing the track with some firebreathing monsters, and if they had half a clue, they'd be workign out beforehand roughly what lap to expect to be lapped, and keeping one eye firmly on the mirrors waiting for it to happen. The Lambo screaming round the outside of them should have served to bring that back into the front of their minds!!!

Oh well, the MX5 owner who is far more experienced than me didnt know the Lotus was about to blow by as seconds earlier he had checked his mirror and didnt think it would closing that fast...and how do you know what was discussed at the driver briefing? Anyway mot meant to be an argumemrent...just an amazing vid

my point is he shouldn't have been surprised! Unless he thought there was only 1 fast car in the race and forgot about the other 10 cars running in the 1:30's...

we know it was discussed at the drivers breifing because he said so. Presumably for this very reason - ie the huge speed differentials of the different classes in the race. And because it was a one hour enduro, lapping slower traffic (some of whom were 30sec a lap slower!!!) would have been a major issue... I don't think he should have been surprised.

Boxter doesnt look like it has a cage either

Definitely does :thumbsup:

That's my best mate in the Boxster (or his dad, can't recall which was in the car at the time). I sent him this video last week and he said it wasn't nearly as close from the camera in his car. Great video though, certainly made me jump when I first saw it!

It would scare the pants off me if I were in the MX-5, but Barton is a top driver and personally I think hesitation causes accidents a lot of the time.

Oh well, the MX5 owner who is far more experienced than me didnt know the Lotus was about to blow by as seconds earlier he had checked his mirror and didnt think it would closing that fast...and how do you know what was discussed at the driver briefing? Anyway mot meant to be an argumemrent...just an amazing vid

MX5 driver who did the video commented on what was said at the driver's briefing, he was there. He has since put up a highlights video of the entire event showing lots of passing and the speed differentials involved, if he is an idiot then there should be more idiots like him instead of the real idiots who wander all over the place and have no idea of what is going on.

Edited by 260DET

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
    • You are all good then, I didn't realise the port was in a part you can (have!) remove. Just pull the broken part out, clean it and the threads should be fine. Yes, the whole point about remote mounting is it takes almost all of the vibration out via the flexible hose. You just need a convenient chassis point and a cable tie or 3.
×
×
  • Create New...