Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

sorry to hear the terrible news as ive had 2 cars stolen in the past...dont give up as i found my 1st stolen after 2 weeks & my stolen datsun 1600 after 7 mths (i had a lead & kept calling this for months until he cracked & was a rat on his mate)

Hope so fingers are crossed

  • Replies 136
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

After reading this thread again, people said it was seen in edwarstown and on south road? I saw a white one in rough condition tonight on a tow truck was passing by turbo tune at about 5:15pm. can't say I remember the rims only got a glance, but I think it had the n1 front bar . didn't think much of it woulda followed it, n got a photo if I had thought of this thread.

After reading this thread again, people said it was seen in edwarstown and on south road? I saw a white one in rough condition tonight on a tow truck was passing by turbo tune at about 5:15pm. can't say I remember the rims only got a glance, but I think it had the n1 front bar . didn't think much of it woulda followed it, n got a photo if I had thought of this thread.

Was prob my car on the way to the port. Heaps happy

Great news :thumbsup:

Now, shed some details...

Car was found in the back of someone's shed with another one, not sure if the other one was stolen or owned by whoever was at the house, was in the process of stripping it back things missing like battery interior bits compliance plate was taken not 100% sure what else, cops said probaly couple of grand to get it going again but he said he couldn't tell of there was any major issues like blown engine or anything. So was wondering does victim of crime come into play here???? Also the parts were possibly being moved onto the car it was with so it will prob be a bit before I get it back because they have to go through the cars etc

Same thing happened to my dato 1600 which had an fj20t in it...this is going back to 1998.

The car was found and stripped like your gtr, the guy was unemployed so legally I couldn't get a cent out of him and as my solicitor explained "its like squeezing blood out of a rock".

To his day he still owes me 8k but I decided to let it go after a few yrs as it is no worth putting my family in potential danger, i would retaliate much harder which isn't a good thing.

I got my car back minus the pieces as they were sitting in his house. The issue was that I couldn't prove those bits were mine + the numbers were already done on the chassis and block so I had to identify the car with 40 unique markings prior to seeing the car again - I noted over 100 markings.

Our law sometimes protects the thief more than us.

itd be nice to know how the cops knew where it was... whether it was a stake-out, informant, accidental.... whether they were actually working for their money or waiting for it to fall in their lap..... but i know they'll never reveal their trade secrets

Yeah I'd like to know what the go is, if they caught someone or got tipped off or what but i doubt they will tell me, just hope to get all the bits they took off it back, it wasn't much from what I was told it was mainly interior stuff but they did take the compliance plate off so not sure what I'm going to do there. Thanks for the offers with parts I'll have to let ppl know what I'm after when I get it back but I do know it has no battery and the ignition stuff is obviously really screwed but overall I'm happy to get it back in one way or another.

I'm bit confused as to why we pay victims of crime levy if you have to try and get the money back from someone who has no assets of job? Shouldn't it just come from the levy we pay when we do our rego?

you're best of talking to a lawyer about the victims of crime stuff, but i have heard of people being payed out for ridiculously minor things. surely something could be done if you've had your car stolen and stripped. just go find a lawyer offering a free first consultation and see what they say :P

VOC levey gets paid on every single fine that gets issued and is payable usually to people who have gone through assaults and have pain and suffering be it physical or mental, side note the accused has to be found guilty also

Best bet to call the legal aid commission

Car was found in the back of someone's shed with another one, not sure if the other one was stolen or owned by whoever was at the house, was in the process of stripping it back things missing like battery interior bits compliance plate was taken not 100% sure what else, cops said probaly couple of grand to get it going again but he said he couldn't tell of there was any major issues like blown engine or anything. So was wondering does victim of crime come into play here???? Also the parts were possibly being moved onto the car it was with so it will prob be a bit before I get it back because they have to go through the cars etc

No it doesn't.....however, it won't be classed as "illegal use" (usually a slap on the wrist) because they didn't go for a joyride and burn it....they actually kept it and stripped parts off it.

It now becomes "grand theft auto"........heavier penalty for them and better chance for you to claim material damages but they'll probably still only get a kick up the bum instead of a slap on the wrist.

A lot of you may remember years ago when the laws first changed from an automatic theft charge to an illegal use charge (much softer penalty, if any).

...and it's all because some smart arsed lawyer set a precedent in place by successfully defending some little thieving prick by convincing the judge that he merely 'borrowed the car' and had full intention of returning it.....what a load of cock!!

If you were living in Africa you could ask the judge to have one of his hands cut off and the judge may actually oblige your request >_<

Laws are pretty soft in this country when it comes to car theft unfortunately.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • @Kapr Haha yeah thats the one. I missed that you had a built up engine, I wouldn't want to run it on there either then. It was good in my situation just to replace the original turbo on a stock engine. @MBS206Yep definitely not a replacement for anything name brand
    • You are selling this? I have never bought something from marketplace...i dont know if i trust that enough. And the price is little bit "too" good...
    • https://www.facebook.com/share/19kSVAc4tc/?mibextid=wwXIfr
    • It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about. Reliability of everything in a 34 drops MASSIVELY above the 300kw mark. Keeping everything going great at beyond that value will cost ten times the $. Clutches become shit, gearboxes (and engines/bottom ends) become consumable, traction becomes crap. The good news is looking legalish/actually being legal is slighly under the 300kw mark. I would make the assumption you want to ditch the stock plenum too and want to go a front facing unit of some description due to the cross flow. Do the bends on a return flow hurt? Not really. A couple of bends do make a difference but not nearly as much in a forced induction situation. Add 1psi of boost to overcome it. Nobody has ever gone and done a track session monitoring IAT then done a different session on a different intercooler and monitored IAT to see the difference here. All of the benefits here are likely in the "My engine is a forged consumable that I drive once a year because it needs a rebuild every year which takes 9 months of the year to complete" territory. It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about with this car.
    • By "reverse flow", do you mean "return flow"? Being the IC having a return pipe back behind the bumper reo, or similar? If so... I am currently making ~250 rwkW on a Neo at ~17-18 psi. With a return flow. There's nothing to indicate that it is costing me a lot of power at this level, and I would be surprised if I could not push it harder. True, I have not measured pressure drop across it or IAT changes, but the car does not seem upset about it in any way. I won't be bothering to look into it unless it starts giving trouble or doesn't respond to boost increases when I next put it on the dyno. FWIW, it was tuned with the boost controller off, so achieving ~15-16 psi on the wastegate spring alone, and it is noticeably quicker with the boost controller on and yielding a couple of extra pounds. Hence why I think it is doing OK. So, no, I would not arbitrarily say that return flows are restrictive. Yes, they are certainly restrictive if you're aiming for higher power levels. But I also think that the happy place for a street car is <300 rwkW anyway, so I'm not going to be aiming for power levels that would require me to change the inlet pipework. My car looks very stock, even though everything is different. The turbo and inlet pipes all look stock and run in the stock locations, The airbox looks stock (apart from the inlet being opened up). The turbo looks stock, because it's in the stock location, is the stock housings and can't really be seen anyway. It makes enough power to be good to drive, but won't raise eyebrows if I ever f**k up enough for the cops to lift the bonnet.
×
×
  • Create New...