Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

just seen a black 35 gtr has been impounded for a month for doing 100 in the 40 zone of the super way on south rd

http://www.adelaidenow.com.au/news/south-australia/speeding-driver-clocked-at-110kmh-in-a-40kmh-zone/story-e6frea83-1226240900775

really dispointing , and hope you get your 35 crushed in front of u.

i work in the construction industry and that sort or crazyness is outa line

  • Replies 63
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

i reckon it should definately be crushed! if you want to be that much of a wanker. Considering that the only cars that i have seen crushed are of boonga spec this would really open peoples eyes

So was there even any roadworkers there? I dont condone speeding through roadworks because there is no one there. but if this is the case, then big deal.

I wouldnt have done it either way.

Lol. All that means is there was a cop nearby.

In which case, tough shit.

Doesn't mean there were workers going about their uh... Well, work.

Which may be a poor excuse, but it's about 8,000 million miles of roadworks speed limits, and people working for about a kilometre. It's a bit ridic.

Was there a speed limit sign ? if there was how hard is it to do the speed limit, f**king self important morons, see a sign, do what it says, simple if you have at least 1 brain cell.

If you want to go fast you should do motorsports, but most people who speed on the streets are crap drivers anyway and wouldnt last 3 laps before offing their car.

CRUSH IT.

Waits for reply from HECKTIC DUDE who knows better........................................................

is it black or very dark blue

i think it could be the same person who had there first R35 impounded the very first in australia

nah, number plates are wrong. those ones and new SA plates.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
×
×
  • Create New...