Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

ithink the 6265 would be a better choice i have -5 o mine with 2.7 stroker full boost at 4000rpm with eflex fuel.i think the 6265 will be similar (-5)but with more kw.that ill be my choice when i go single set up

good luck ith build mate

  • Replies 131
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Pretty sure this is Wei's old car. Check me though, if im right the vin would be 6U9000BNR34005487.

Aparently Eugene from JDM performance used to own it.

Looked good when i last saw it, congrats on the purchase and best of luck with the build.

Pretty sure this is Wei's old car. Check me though, if im right the vin would be 6U9000BNR34005487.

Aparently Eugene from JDM performance used to own it.

Looked good when i last saw it, congrats on the purchase and best of luck with the build.

Yeah mate you'd be right, I bought this off Wei about 6 months ago... Best thing I ever spent my cash on haha

Yeah, I just got off google looking into the 6265 and 6765 comparisons and I think the 6765 is more suited to a 3L...

The 6265 is rated at 520kw so we'll see how we go haha

Quick update...

Just bought a Powertune twin in tank fuel pump, and two walbro pumps rated at 1000hp for the GTR.

Want something that's not going to be noisy or smell of fuel, plus hidden from the fuzz haha :thumbsup:

I would spend more time on google understand turbo's. I would like you to look at compressor maps then choose one of the shelf. Turbo's that are HP rated , this only tells you the entry hole size that equals to how much air flow through the hole size.

If you need some good info let me know.

Geez my old car is still alive and is going to be an animal! I just read the whole thread, sorry to hear what happened to your car Brad. I loved this car when i had it and got it running well with its old -5 setup. I can tell the car went to a good owner and hope the mods get done soon and make it more of a monster :)

Update...

Just finished at Knight engines, pulling the engine down and the crank is F#%£ED!!!

1# piston took the brunt of the oil surge and the bearing was completely fried, had a 10c piece sized chunk missing... :whistling:

So from here, a 2.8L crank is being ordered and the precision billet 6765 with T4 divided rear will be ordered also...

Kyle from 6boost is doing up one of his twin scroll steam pipe manifold with dual external watsegates to go with this build so it's going to be insane.. Haha

Will post pics up tonight...

Cheers

Pics...

Scoring on the bore.

post-47369-0-71016700-1327122316_thumb.jpg

Butchered head where the 10c piece sized bit of bearing bounced around at 8000rpm.

post-47369-0-46935700-1327122428_thumb.jpg

#1 Piston top.

post-47369-0-49495500-1327122528_thumb.jpg

#1 Piston con rod (bottom of photo) cap is black... Torched haha

post-47369-0-31130300-1327122625_thumb.jpg

"Butchered head where the 10c piece sized bit of bearing bounced around at 8000rpm."

I dont quite understand how a piece of the bearing gets into the cylinder? :unsure:

None the less, good luck with the build and sorry to hear about the wheels mate, shit like that isnt even a bad joke.. what wheels were they? te37?

"Butchered head where the 10c piece sized bit of bearing bounced around at 8000rpm."

I dont quite understand how a piece of the bearing gets into the cylinder? :unsure:

None the less, good luck with the build and sorry to hear about the wheels mate, shit like that isnt even a bad joke.. what wheels were they? te37?

We were thinking the exact same thing, but the only piece of debris in the sump or oil filter or anywhere was one messed up bit of bearing so...? Couldn't tell you to be honest... It's the only thing there.. :blink:

The stolen rims were stock GTR rims. I should be receiving a set of 18x10.5 +15 TE37 SLs in two or three weeks though haha :bunny:

The piston to head clearence is about 1mm in the quench area (less at higher rpm due to rod stretch).

When the rod bearing went by by that clearence disappeared. Then the piston crown quench area collided with the head. Chain reaction effect.

The piston to head clearence is about 1mm in the quench area (less at higher rpm due to rod stretch).

When the rod bearing went by by that clearence disappeared. Then the piston crown quench area collided with the head. Chain reaction effect.

Oh I see, thanks for the insight mate..

Hey guys...

Due to the budget for this build not being unlimited, I have decided not to skimp on the reliability measures and save money by not getting the stroker kit and getting a new R34 crank from Nissan...

I'd rather have a bullet proof RB26 then a normal RB28.

:cheers:

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • If as it's stalling, the fuel pressure rises, it's saying there's less vacuum in the intake manifold. This is pretty typical of an engine that is slowing down.   While typically is agree it sounds fuel related, it really sounds fuel/air mixture related. Since the whole system has been refurbished, including injectors, pump, etc, it's likely we've altered how well the system is delivering fuel. If someone before you has messed with the IACV because it needed fiddling with as the fuel system was dieing out, we need to readjust it back. Getting things back to factory spec everywhere, is what's going to help the entire system. So if it idles at 400rpm with no IACV, that needs raising. Getting factory air flow back to normal will help us get everything back in spec, and likely help chase down any other issues. Back on IACV, if the base idle (no IACV plugged in) is too far out, it's a lot harder for the ECU to control idle. The IACV duty cycle causes non linear variations in reality. When I've tuned the idle valves in the past, you need to keep it in a relatively narrow window on aftermarket ecus to stop them doing wild dances. It also means if your base idle is too low, the valve needs to open too much, and then the smallest % change ends up being a huge variation.
    • I guess one thing that might be wrong is the manifold pressure.  It is a constant -5.9 and never moves even under 100% throttle and load.  I would expect it to atleast go to 0 correct?  It's doing this with the OEM MAP as well as the ECU vacuum sensor. When trying to tune the base map under load the crosshairs only climb vertically with RPM, but always in the -5.9 column.
    • AHHHH gotchaa, I'll do that once I am home again. I tried doing the harness with the multimeter but it seems the car needed a jump, there was no power when it was in the "ON" position. Not sure if I should use car battery jump starter or if its because the stuff that has been disconnect the car just does send power.
    • As far as I can tell I have everything properly set in the Haltech software for engine size, injector data, all sensors seem to be reporting proper numbers.  If I change any injector details it doesnt run right.    Changing the base map is having the biggest change in response, im not sure how people are saying it doesnt really matter.  I'm guessing under normal conditions the ECU is able to self adjust and keep everything smooth.   Right now my best performance is happening by lowering the base map just enough to where the ECU us doing short term cut of about 45% to reach the target Lambda of 14.7.  That way when I start putting load on it still has high enough fuel map to not be so lean.  After 2500 rpm I raised the base map to what would be really rich at no load, but still helps with the lean spots on load.  I figure I don't have much reason to be above 2500rpm with no load.  When watching other videos it seems their target is reached much faster than mine.  Mine takes forever to adjust and reach the target. My next few days will be spent making sure timing is good, it was running fine before doing the ECU and DBW swap, but want to verify.  I'll also probably swap in the new injectors I bought as well as a walbro 255 pump.  
    • It would be different if the sealant hadn't started to peel up with gaps in the glue about ~6cm and bigger in some areas. I would much prefer not having to do the work take them off the car . However, the filler the owner put in the roof rack mount cavities has shrunk and begun to crack on the rail delete panels. I cant trust that to hold off moisture ingress especially where I live. Not only that but I have faded paint on as well as on either side of these panels, so they would need to come off to give the roofline a proper respray. My goal is to get in there and put a healthy amount of epoxy instead of panel filler/bog and potentially skin with carbon fiber. I have 2 spare rolls from an old motorcycle fairing project from a few years back and I think it'd be a nice touch on a black stag.  I've seen some threads where people replace their roof rack delete with a welded in sheet metal part. But has anyone re-worked the roof rails themselves? It seems like there is a lot of volume there to add in some threads and maybe a keyway for a quick(er) release roof rack system. Not afraid to mill something out if I have to. It would be cool to have a cross bar only setup. That way I can keep the sleek roofline that would accept a couple bolts to gain back that extra utility  3D print some snazzy covers to hide the threaded section to be thorough and keep things covered when not using the rack. 
×
×
  • Create New...