Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

ithink the 6265 would be a better choice i have -5 o mine with 2.7 stroker full boost at 4000rpm with eflex fuel.i think the 6265 will be similar (-5)but with more kw.that ill be my choice when i go single set up

good luck ith build mate

  • Replies 131
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Pretty sure this is Wei's old car. Check me though, if im right the vin would be 6U9000BNR34005487.

Aparently Eugene from JDM performance used to own it.

Looked good when i last saw it, congrats on the purchase and best of luck with the build.

Pretty sure this is Wei's old car. Check me though, if im right the vin would be 6U9000BNR34005487.

Aparently Eugene from JDM performance used to own it.

Looked good when i last saw it, congrats on the purchase and best of luck with the build.

Yeah mate you'd be right, I bought this off Wei about 6 months ago... Best thing I ever spent my cash on haha

Yeah, I just got off google looking into the 6265 and 6765 comparisons and I think the 6765 is more suited to a 3L...

The 6265 is rated at 520kw so we'll see how we go haha

Quick update...

Just bought a Powertune twin in tank fuel pump, and two walbro pumps rated at 1000hp for the GTR.

Want something that's not going to be noisy or smell of fuel, plus hidden from the fuzz haha :thumbsup:

I would spend more time on google understand turbo's. I would like you to look at compressor maps then choose one of the shelf. Turbo's that are HP rated , this only tells you the entry hole size that equals to how much air flow through the hole size.

If you need some good info let me know.

Geez my old car is still alive and is going to be an animal! I just read the whole thread, sorry to hear what happened to your car Brad. I loved this car when i had it and got it running well with its old -5 setup. I can tell the car went to a good owner and hope the mods get done soon and make it more of a monster :)

Update...

Just finished at Knight engines, pulling the engine down and the crank is F#%£ED!!!

1# piston took the brunt of the oil surge and the bearing was completely fried, had a 10c piece sized chunk missing... :whistling:

So from here, a 2.8L crank is being ordered and the precision billet 6765 with T4 divided rear will be ordered also...

Kyle from 6boost is doing up one of his twin scroll steam pipe manifold with dual external watsegates to go with this build so it's going to be insane.. Haha

Will post pics up tonight...

Cheers

Pics...

Scoring on the bore.

post-47369-0-71016700-1327122316_thumb.jpg

Butchered head where the 10c piece sized bit of bearing bounced around at 8000rpm.

post-47369-0-46935700-1327122428_thumb.jpg

#1 Piston top.

post-47369-0-49495500-1327122528_thumb.jpg

#1 Piston con rod (bottom of photo) cap is black... Torched haha

post-47369-0-31130300-1327122625_thumb.jpg

"Butchered head where the 10c piece sized bit of bearing bounced around at 8000rpm."

I dont quite understand how a piece of the bearing gets into the cylinder? :unsure:

None the less, good luck with the build and sorry to hear about the wheels mate, shit like that isnt even a bad joke.. what wheels were they? te37?

"Butchered head where the 10c piece sized bit of bearing bounced around at 8000rpm."

I dont quite understand how a piece of the bearing gets into the cylinder? :unsure:

None the less, good luck with the build and sorry to hear about the wheels mate, shit like that isnt even a bad joke.. what wheels were they? te37?

We were thinking the exact same thing, but the only piece of debris in the sump or oil filter or anywhere was one messed up bit of bearing so...? Couldn't tell you to be honest... It's the only thing there.. :blink:

The stolen rims were stock GTR rims. I should be receiving a set of 18x10.5 +15 TE37 SLs in two or three weeks though haha :bunny:

The piston to head clearence is about 1mm in the quench area (less at higher rpm due to rod stretch).

When the rod bearing went by by that clearence disappeared. Then the piston crown quench area collided with the head. Chain reaction effect.

The piston to head clearence is about 1mm in the quench area (less at higher rpm due to rod stretch).

When the rod bearing went by by that clearence disappeared. Then the piston crown quench area collided with the head. Chain reaction effect.

Oh I see, thanks for the insight mate..

Hey guys...

Due to the budget for this build not being unlimited, I have decided not to skimp on the reliability measures and save money by not getting the stroker kit and getting a new R34 crank from Nissan...

I'd rather have a bullet proof RB26 then a normal RB28.

:cheers:

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • You won't need to do that if your happy to learn to tune it yourself. You 100% do not need to do that. It is not part of the learning process. It's not like driving on track and 'finding the limit by stepping over the limit'. You should not ever accidently blow up an engine and you should have setup the ECU's engine protection to save you from yourself while you are learning anyway. Plenty of us have tuned their own cars, myself included. We still come here for advice/guidance/new ideas etc.  What have you been doing so far to learn how to tune?
    • Put the ECU's MAP line in your mouth. Blow as hard as you can. You should be able to see about 10 kPa, maybe 15 kPa positive pressure. Suck on it. You should be able to generate a decent vacuum to about the same level also. Note that this is only ~2 psi either way. If the MAP is reading -5 psi all the time, ignition on, engine running or not, driving around or not, then it is severely f**ked. Also, you SHOULD NOT BE DRIVING IT WITHOUT A LOAD REFERENCE. You will break the engine. Badly.
    • Could be correct. Meter might be that far out. Compare against a known 5 ohm 1% resistor.
    • @Murray_Calavera  If I were an expert I wouldn't be in here looking for assistance.  I am extremely computer literate, have above average understanding on how things should be working and how they should tie together.  If I need to go to a professional tuner so be it, but I'd much rather learn and do things myself even if it means looking for some guidance along the way and blowing up a few engines. @GTSBoy  I was hoping it would be as simple as a large vacuum leak somewhere but I'm unable to find anything, all lines seem to be well capped or going where they need to be, and when removed there is vacuum felt on the tube.  It would be odd for the Haltech built in MAP to be faulty, the GTT tune I imported had it enabled from the start, I incorrectly assumed it was reading a signal from the stock MAP, but that doesn't exist.  After running a vacuum hose to the ECU the signal doesn't change more than 0.2 in either direction.   I'll probably upload a video of my settings tomorrow, as it stands I'm able to daily drive, but getting stuttering when giving it gas from idle, so pulling away from lights is a slow process of revving it up and feathering the clutch until its moving, then it will accelerate fine.  It sounds like I need to get to the bottom of the manifold pressure issue, but the ignition timing section is most intimidating to me and will probably let a pro do that part.  Tomorrow I'll try a different vacuum line to T off of, with any luck I selected one that was already bypassed during the DBW swap.  (edit: I went out and did it right now, the line I had chosen did appear to have no vacuum on it, it used to go to the front of the intake, I've now completely blocked that one off at the bracket that holds several vacuum lines by the firewall.  I T'd into the vacuum line that goes from that bracket to the vacuum pump at the front of the car, but no change in the MAP readings).  Using the new vacuum line that has obvious vacuum on the hose, im still only getting readings between -6.0 and -5.2.  I'm wondering why the ECU was detecting -5.3 when nothing was connected to the MAP nipple and ECU MAP selected as the source. @feartherb26  I do have +T in the works but wanted to wait until Spring to start with that swap since this is my good winter AWD vehicle.  When removing the butterfly, did it leave a bunch of holes in the manifold that you needed to plug?  I thought about removing it but assumed it would be a mess.   I notice no difference when capping the vacuum line to it or letting it do its thing.  This whole thing has convinced me to just get a forward facing manifold when the time comes though.
    • Update: tested my spark plugs that are supposed to be 5ohms with a 10% deviation and one gave me a 0 ohms reading and the rest were 3.9ohm<, so one bad and the others on their way out.
×
×
  • Create New...