Jump to content
SAU Community

Fwd Inferior In Motorsport?

warps

By warps,
in Motorsport Discussion & Builds

 Share

Recommended Posts

warps Mentor

warps

Posted
Posted

No, not another FWD vs RWD debate. I know that this topic polarises most opinions, so I really am not interested in hearing uninformed "I drove my cousins Vtec CRX and it felt like a bus compared to my 350hp GTSt" discussion.

I know there are some educated / experienced people here who have very strong views (with engineering knowledge and hard facts to back up their claims) about the benefits / otherwise of FWD. I was reading the regulations for the new ARC G2 class (basically reads like round 2 of the old group G formula). Essentially it's 2WD only, and wither 2L N/A or 1.6L forced induction. It sounds like it's geared for the small shopping trolleys (Jazz / Fiesta / Polo etc) with engine transplants, and a lot more freedoms than the boring old Gp N (and even PRC) used to allow.

Anyway, to my point. I note that the FWD cars get hit with a 40-50kg weight penalty (depending on engine size). If FWD is so inferior, why do the RWD's get lower weight limits? I know that it has been said that FWD is beneficial in very specialised cases (motorkhana - low speed on slippery surfaces) but the ARC these days is much more high speed than the tight twisty stuff where FWD is supposed to have a benefit. My own experience with FWD vs RWD tends to support the beneifts of FWD on dirt. Interested to hear some (educated) views.

The full regs can be found here http://www.camsmanual.com.au/pdf/04_rally_road/RR17_Group_G2_2012-1.pdf

Regardless of whether you prefer FWD or RWD, I think that a bunch of light weight 250hp 2WD rockets in the forest (with manufacturer support at some level) can only be a good thing.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/389213-fwd-inferior-in-motorsport/
Share on other sites
warps Mentor

warps

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Yeh, Harry - I think it's a draft at this stage - there's still a few copy and paste errors in there. eg how they quote minimum weights for cars with an engine capacity of 5 litres (what multiplier are they using for that?)

1.6 turbo would put it into the over 2L category in all other CAMS rally regs, so I can't see how they would lump the 2 together - which makes your point even more significant.

I don't know how much a 30mm restrictor would...errr....restrict a 1.6 turbo engine, but that may be what they're trying to achieve. I think that would limit power to the vicinity of 250hp, which is easily achievable with NA 2L (obviously massive difference in torque curves)

Dale FZ1 Veteran

Dale FZ1

Posted
Posted

Having trouble getting the regs to download so can only go off comments posted above.

The 1.7 multiplication factor would always see a turbo 1.6 running in a different equivalent engine capacity class.

Torque hauls cars out of turns, but getting a FWD with massive midrange to pull, steer, and not eat its front tyres in a single stage might be a challenge.

I'd be all for ballasting the turbo cars if that meant hearing a b.it of N/A bark in the forest. But I don't think weighting up FWD cars is the way to encourage broader participation. How many small/medium RWD platforms are out there these days? Not many :(.

Duncan Grand Master

Duncan

Posted
Posted

Interesting. This is dirt rally right?

The only thing I know for sure is that none of the existing dirt formulas are being won by rwd cars over fwd cars. I have seen very few rwd in the forests since the 1600s all (mostly) died off, and all the new cheap cars are fwd. There are a handful of rwd around (I remember speaking to a guy in NSW having some success with a Silvia na) but very few.

But it is very hard to do a fair comparison just based on the driven wheels, because so much else is different. Especially in production based cars because manufacturers dont generally make a big FWD, or a small RWD to compare. In NSW prod circuit racing it is AWD > RWD > FWD, but then again the fastest FWD makes about half the power of the RWD cars. Certainly BTC and WTC prove the FWD and RWD can be very close under tight enough regs.

Dale FZ1 Veteran

Dale FZ1

Posted
Posted (edited)

AWD cars are very efficient point-to-point cars through the forest. No doubting that. But if all I want to see is something fast I can go to the nearest airport and view the takeoffs. The 2wd regs are an overdue step in the right direction from the viewpoint of spectator interest. And I think that a sensible approach to regulating for equity/ parity between N/A and turbo via weight and/or inlet restrictors would work. Might also be a workaround for cost savings so people don't feel obliged to have to build a new car each year or 2 just to stay competitive? The economic climate doesn't look like getting any healthier anytime soon so any competitor interest is better than dwindling numbers.

I think the Poms have got it right with their touring car formula. They are prepared to play with it to ensure it continues to work rather than let things go and then wonder what went wrong.

Edited by Dale FZ1
hrd-hr30 Grand Master

hrd-hr30

Posted
Posted

I know there's a 1.7 multiplication factor for turbos, but that means very little when the ARC is for 2WD vehicles this year. The turbos and NA's will be going head to head for outright regardless of maths.

Dale FZ1 Veteran

Dale FZ1

Posted
Posted

Agreed, but the maths is (for me) where it's at to ensure the different configurations ARE going head to head. I don't want to see a one/two make championship, and I would like to see a Drivers championship. Where's Jack Monkhouse?

Nee-san Grand Master

Nee-san

Posted
Posted

Interesting. This is dirt rally right?

The only thing I know for sure is that none of the existing dirt formulas are being won by rwd cars over fwd cars. I have seen very few rwd in the forests since the 1600s all (mostly) died off, and all the new cheap cars are fwd. There are a handful of rwd around (I remember speaking to a guy in NSW having some success with a Silvia na) but very few.

But it is very hard to do a fair comparison just based on the driven wheels, because so much else is different. Especially in production based cars because manufacturers dont generally make a big FWD, or a small RWD to compare. In NSW prod circuit racing it is AWD > RWD > FWD, but then again the fastest FWD makes about half the power of the RWD cars. Certainly BTC and WTC prove the FWD and RWD can be very close under tight enough regs.

This is more or less on the money, it seems the entire automotive market is making a shift towards smaller FWD vehicles, even into the sports car theatre.

Racing, especially in production based categories always reflects the general state of the domestic market with trends etc.

I know in BTC and WTC that RWD cars are penalised with weight over the FWD models and of course AWD has the harshest penalties of all.

It comes down to the fact that there are far less RWD cars that are small and lightweight enough to compete with some of the FWD vehicles being run.

Most FWD vehicles are small and very lightweight, which is more of a differentiator then the performance deficit fundamental in FWD layouts.

Generally when I make an argument about the various pros and cons of a drivetrain layout, I use a like for like comparison. weight, COG etc etc.

anyway this is more about rally and does not IMHO accurately reflect the consensus of motorsport(S) in general.

warps Mentor

warps

Posted
  • Author
Posted

anyway this is more about rally and does not IMHO accurately reflect the consensus of motorsport(S) in general.

Dem's fighting words, fella. :nyaanyaa:

Agree though - FWD's don't seem to have the same "advantages" in other forms of motorsport as they do in gravel rally. (apart from some very quick Civics in U2l IPRA) Even the rally communities are divided on the FWD vs RWD debate. I've seen some basic spec FWD's carve up much faster and more powerful RWD's (turbo RX7's, Silvias) - even taking driver talent into consideration. Even my own stock engined EG civic, which gets hosed at LAkeside to the tune of 10 sec a lap can hold its own against the RWD's on dirt (I have always managed to finish ahead of all but 1 RWD car in dirt sprints so far)

Will be interested to see how this pans out though. I hope it isn't one sided, or doesn't turn into a "one make series". Whether you love RWD or not, you can't deny that the sight and sound of a well driven NA RWD in the forests is poetry in motion indeed

mad082 Grand Master

mad082

Posted
Posted

This is more or less on the money, it seems the entire automotive market is making a shift towards smaller FWD vehicles, even into the sports car theatre.

Racing, especially in production based categories always reflects the general state of the domestic market with trends etc.

I know in BTC and WTC that RWD cars are penalised with weight over the FWD models and of course AWD has the harshest penalties of all.

It comes down to the fact that there are far less RWD cars that are small and lightweight enough to compete with some of the FWD vehicles being run.

Most FWD vehicles are small and very lightweight, which is more of a differentiator then the performance deficit fundamental in FWD layouts.

Generally when I make an argument about the various pros and cons of a drivetrain layout, I use a like for like comparison. weight, COG etc etc.

anyway this is more about rally and does not IMHO accurately reflect the consensus of motorsport(S) in general.

getting slightly off topic for a second (partly to stir a few people up), had the weight penalties been more accurately/evenly done then the GTR wouldn't have had the success it did.

back on topic, i think that where fwd gets its advantage in rally is from the fact that, as it was said in the first post (i think), it can pull itself out of the corners, where as rwd has to balance oversteer and understeer. both rwd and fwd will understeer into a corner (pretty easily) when pushed too hard. but if oversteer occurs then the fwd can pull itself out while the rwd has to try and accelerate and control the slide with the wheels that have lost traction. also when running a bit wide (and losing a bit of rear traction) and fwd cars are putting their power down on a 'cleaner' part of the track. all the loose gravel gets pushed to the outside of the track, where the rwd cars are trying to get their drive from.

Duncan Grand Master

Duncan

Posted
Posted

well on tarmac, the btcc fwd cars certainly show the advantage of being able to keep their foot down when the car starts to oversteer....those guys catch the biggest angle slides I've ever seen. If you were in a rwd you would give up and hit the anchors, going along for the ride, waaaay sooner.

Duncan Grand Master

Duncan

Posted
Posted

Will be interested to see how this pans out though. I hope it isn't one sided, or doesn't turn into a "one make series". Whether you love RWD or not, you can't deny that the sight and sound of a well driven NA RWD in the forests is poetry in motion indeed

BTW I totally agree with this. no doubt rwd is the most fun to drive.

it's just when you are chosing a formula/set of rules, it may not be the cheapest, fastest, or most competitive.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Murray_Calavera
      Jacks that fit under GTR lips that can reach the subframe?

      By Murray_Calavera · Posted

      My dream is also to have a proper hoist, but I don't think it will ever happen. My quickjack is probably as close as I'll ever get, it really is very good though. 
    • Duncan
      Duncan's V37.......race car?

      By Duncan · Posted

      Yeah we keep on in the dailies, it is pretty poor how many animals get hit and the driver leaves without checking....have saved a couple of little ones over the years. Bit of a gruesome job though, pouches generally need to be cut open because they are so tight and often the joey doesn't realise mum is gone so they are still locked onto the teat. I checked the modules in front of the DS wheel where an oil cooler should go.... There is the radar unit - that can go for race use) One of the 2 HX water pumps, the silver cylinder. That needs to be kept but might be able to be relocated But the bad news, the big computer mounted vertically in front of the wheel (blocking any potential air exit) is the electric steering computer. That is required until/unless i do a hydraulic steering conversion, and in CAD based modern car design it is not like I can just pop a big unit like that somewhere else (plus the loom would be too short anywhere else too). So, the passenger side is OK to clear out (just use a smaller washer reservoir, potentially elsewhere), but the DS no beuno
    • Duncan
      Chris' Toyota Mark ii JZX110

      By Duncan · Posted

      Well, all the best with the new camry It was interesting to hear about the UK process, it is generally a lot more streamlined here with a shipping agent looking after all the import side (noting the exact final price can still be a surprise.....) and I've used a few different brokers on the japan (or US) side, and never had any trouble with any of them....luck of the draw I guess. You mentioned you didn't get the auction sheet (understandable since you bought it from a dealer, not auction), but I always try and get hold of that because they are pretty thorough. I've imported 2x R grade vehicles over the years and both were fine, repairs in Japan are pretty thorough compared to here in Oz.
    • Duncan
      Jacks that fit under GTR lips that can reach the subframe?

      By Duncan · Posted

      BTW I measured the jack I have, it is 70mm at the saddle but you only have about 700 until it returns to 150mm high at the cylinder so it is good but no magic bullet.
    • hoodedreeper
      Chris' Toyota Mark ii JZX110

      By hoodedreeper · Posted

      My experience with Rising Sun Exports Before agreeing to the sale I tried to do as much research as I could (obviously), his Facebook reviews are 98% and he goes Live at least once or twice a week. I contacted 2 people in the UK who had used him for their imports, both had positive feedback. His explanation and talk through of the import process was thorough, answering any query no matter how stupid it was. It felt as soon as the money was sent, communication dropped off. I asked for shipping updates every 2 weeks or so, not wanting to pester him, he never had any updates. I wasn't informed the car had been dropped off at the port, I only found out by his Facebook story. I asked for the photos taken at the port, knowing he would need some for insurance purposes. I received a few 5 second clips and that's it. When asked again, he said his staff had them. Weeks later I asked again, he tells me he doesn't have any, but does have 50 photos from the original advert. I never received them. I eventually got the documents sent via WhatsApp after I mentioned the port was requesting them. I purchased a CarVX report, to find out the vehicle is a Grade R with recorded accident damage, first recorded in 2017 when it was first auctioned. He never told me the grade, then again I didn't ask. His response was "Grade R means nothing, it wasn't chassis damage". Still, I would have liked to have been informed about it. Jon prides himself on being open and honest when it comes to inspecting cars, it's his main job doing so at the auctions for customers. When the vehicle arrived in the UK I noticed a few little cosmetic issues. It's a 21 year old car so it wasn't going to be mint condition. The side skirts are cracked on each corner and the sealant is failing. The front grill on the bonnet/hood isn't secured very well, mounting studs are missing. Both minor things, but again, it would have been nice to be told. During a Facebook Live walk around video of the vehicle, he mentioned it has a front Whiteline anti roll bar/sway bar. While on the inspection ramp, I noticed the stock item has been installed. When first questioned, his response was "the ARB? Switched? Since when, it never had them". Since sending video and photo evidence I've not received a response. I'm probably being over critical of the overall condition of an old car, but all I wanted was honesty (which he claims to have). I'm aware I wasn't his only customer, he's busy doing XYZ but other reviews praise him for great communication with regular updates and photos, I felt I didn't receive the same treatment. 
×
×
  • Create New...