Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I've just purchased a -10 non return valve thingie from Earls, it will be fitted on the return line from the can to the sump, they don't do -12 so it will have some adaptors, Damn these things cost.

Fingers crossed this will help if there is oil being pushed up the hose.

Eastern creek on Sunday, I'm hoping this helps.

I should have went dry sump at the start of the build, things would have been so much simpler.

remember to remove the spring out of the valve, otherwise it won't drain back.

The one I'm getting doesn't have a spring (sort of), it is a flap which only needs .5psi to seal, the guy said it will flow until a 0.5psi backpressure hits it.

P/N 251010

At least I hope that how it works, for almost $300 I would hate to get the wrong part.

Gotta love earls retail pricing.

I use the same "valve" occasionally in some of the boats I do dry sumps for.

They work okay in theory but can cause more issues than they solve when the engine isn't breathing right to begin with.

  • 2 weeks later...

Finaly sorted my oil problems, my return line to the sump and the hot side head drain/vent fittings were to low on the sump, on hard right hand corners the oil would push UP the drain/vent.

In essance I had a - 12 restrictor filling the head and a self filling catch can on anything that involved turning right.

With the catch can return line having the one way valve and the head drain/vent being moved to the turbo oil return all issues were solved.

The drain/vent on the cold side are right at the top of the sump and are not causing any issues.

I did a new PB of 1:52 at the creek last Sunday too, after doing 2 sessions of testing I got up it a bit on the 3rd and the car loved it, not a drop of oil anywhere.

Im stoked, FINALY.

one question, what fittings are used for the oil cap drain?

i assume the fitting allows for the oil cap to still be used? ie. be able to twist on and off

It's an earls fitting, it is rubbing the bonnet though (by so little it isnt funny) will have to try to change the angle it sits at to avoid this. The fitting does allow the cap to spin easily.

Woohooo, and my theory from all those months ago was right....so time to open a workshop for me haha

Good work on the pb :)

Thanks mate, it was something so simple in the end, so simple we didnt even concider it, D'oh!

Finaly sorted my oil problems, my return line to the sump and the hot side head drain/vent fittings were to low on the sump, on hard right hand corners the oil would push UP the drain/vent.

In essance I had a - 12 restrictor filling the head and a self filling catch can on anything that involved turning right.

With the catch can return line having the one way valve and the head drain/vent being moved to the turbo oil return all issues were solved.

The drain/vent on the cold side are right at the top of the sump and are not causing any issues.

I did a new PB of 1:52 at the creek last Sunday too, after doing 2 sessions of testing I got up it a bit on the 3rd and the car loved it, not a drop of oil anywhere.

Im stoked, FINALY.

mlr: would it be too much trouble to bother you for some photos of the setup please??

=)

It's an earls fitting, it is rubbing the bonnet though (by so little it isnt funny) will have to try to change the angle it sits at to avoid this. The fitting does allow the cap to spin easily.

iplen: nice nice

do you have the part number for this fitting?

thanks!

=)

mlr: would it be too much trouble to bother you for some photos of the setup please??

Im taking the car to work this weekend to put on the maintanance ramps, Ill take some photos of it when its up there and the undertray is off.

this might be a silly comment.i have a similar set to r32 stuart but without the line from the oil filler cap.You guys are saying to drain back to sump from catch can i haven't drained back .When i empty my catch can ther is only water in it.im pretty sure you dont want that going back into your sump .Am i on the right track here

thanks

If you are getting water out of your oil catch can you have issues.. Big ones.. Exquisit, will try to get the part number for you, and will upload some shots when I am on a PC instead of the phone..

Edited by iplen

If you are getting water out of your oil catch can you have issues.. Big ones.. Exquisit, will try to get the part number for you, and will upload some shots when I am on a PC instead of the phone..

The oily water in the catch can gets there by the little bit of oil and heat sucking the water out of the atmosphere, Im not saying you should have a heap of water in it but it does get in, expecially when the catch can doesnt drain back it will build up over time, and due to the fact that the inside of the catch can doesnt get very hot the water doesnt cook off.

Put some oil on the stove and heat it up and then let it cool 10 or 20 times, the oil will turn watery when it cools, simple physics is simple.

The same happens in the sump but because the sump oil gets hot it cooks off the water.

This alsois why big deisel engines have fuel/water seperators, the deisel in the tank gets warm and when it cools it absorbs water.

Put even simplyer (?) sit in you car on a cold day, the windows will fog up, this is due to the air inside is warmer than the air outside thus causing condensation.

This is the one way valve

This the hot side head drain/vent which goes to the turbo drain

Hot side head fitting

Front 25 head drain blocked

This is the regulator that was fitted to drop the oil pressure from the TOMEI from 140 psi @ 6000rpm to 105psi at 6000rpm

From the regulator a bleed line goes to the sump

This is the fitting in the side of the head that has the restrictor, the restrictors in the block are both blocked off, this feeds the head oil, it takes 5 minutes to swap a restrictor, another external line geos to the VCT.

The 25 head has 26 covers with mines baffles, the head vents to the catch can Via -12 fittings, the catch can has 2 30mm filters under the pod cover plate.

Time for a Scotch...................

.

mlr: would it be too much trouble to bother you for some photos of the setup please??

=)

  • 1 month later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...