Jump to content
SAU Community

rb30 bottom end for r32 gtr


Recommended Posts

my engine is up for a rebuild and just wanted to know is it worth putting an rb30 vl turbo bottom end on my gtr bottom end if so what are the advantages and if not what are the disadvantages

any help would be appreciated

thanks damo

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think you need to find a workshop that has done this. My understanding is that there are substantial differences in the sump that will make this very difficult.

Just rebuild it back to standard, the rb26 can make power OK as it is

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you going to race it down the QTR id get the 3.0bottom end off a VL .

but if your going to circuit it etc.. just get the 2.6..

in the end id go for a 3.0ltr bottom end since it has lots more torque.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

U might want to check out if the gearbox bellhousing matches the rb30 block and whether the rb26 sump fits as well....

Im not sure abt the specific details but there has to be a reason why we've only seen rb30ed rwd skylines....and the existence of the very expensive os giken stroker kit (with block spacer) to achieve the 3 liters in awd skylines

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have only seen 1 completly successful 3.0 ltr installation into a 33 GTR. by successful i mean makes over 400 rwkw reliably and confidently. sure there are people out there who will take your money, but dont realise that the rb26 sump wont fit on a 3.0 ltr without a major engineering effort. its not a case of 'chuck in a vl block and she will be right mate'

there is great expense, modification and engineering effort required for the extra 400cc.

Put up with a little lag, get a smaller turbs, or fork out up to 30k.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Embrace the freedom of casual encounters on the best dating app in town! Verified Maidens Superlative Сasual Dating
    • Slimline sub on the rear parcel shelf is doable. Pioneer TS-WX140DA is only 70mm high.   
    • People like Johnny Dose Bro might be laughing at my post because I accidentally added 100mm to my numbers. 350-355 is indeed the lower limit. 450 is off-road Skyline spec.
    • What is the "compromise" that you think will happen? Are you thinking that something will get damaged? The only things you have to be concerned about with spherical jointed suspension arms are; Arguments with the constabulary wrt their legality (they are likely to be illegal for road use without an engineering certificatation, and that may not be possible to obtain). A lot more NVH transmitted through to the passengers (which is hardly a concern for those with a preference for good handling, anyway). Greatly increased inspection and maintenance requirements (see above points, both).   It is extremely necessary to ask what car you are talking about. Your discussion on strut tops, for example, would be completely wrong for an R chassis, but be correct for an S chassis. R32s have specific problems that R33/4 do not have. Etc. I have hardened rubber bushes on upper rear control arms and traction rods. Adjustable length so as to be able to set both camber and bump steer. You cannot contemplate doing just the control arms and not the traction arms. And whatever bushing you have in one you should have in the other so that they have similar characteristics. Otherwise you can get increased oddness of behaviour as one bushing flexes and the other doesn't, changing the alignment between them. I have stock lower rear arms with urethane bushes. I may make changes here, these are are driven by the R32's geometry problems, so I won't discuss them here unless it proves necessary. I have spherical joints in the front caster rods. I have experienced absolutely no negatives and only positives from doing so. They are massively better than any other option. I have sphericals in the FUCAs, but this is driven largely by the (again) R32 specific problems with the motion of those arms. I just have to deal with the increased maintenance required. Given how much better the front end behaves with the sphericals in there.....I'd probably be tempted to go away from my preference (which is not to have sphericals on a road car, for 2 of the 3 reasons in the bulleted list above), just to gain those improvements. And so my preference for not using sphericals (in general) on a road car should be obvious. I use them judiciously, though, as required to solve particular problems.
    • Easiest way to know is to break out the multimeter and measure it when cold, then measure all the resistances again once it gets hot enough to misfire. Both the original ignitor and the J Replace version. Factory service manual will have the spec for the terminal measurements.
×
×
  • Create New...