Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • 4 weeks later...

LOL did i say something wrong?? =[ I thought N/a cars rely on backpressure for better throttle response and more low end torque? Cause the car is manufactured to run with the back pressure created by the factory exhaust?

LOL just looked at my exhaust and noticed that my car had a butterfly exhaust from factory, hence why i lost power when i put that canon ==' Also did some research and found out that velocity as well as a warm exhaust increase flow and reduces back pressure, thats why proper exhaust systems produces more power than straight pipes. wider pipes = less velocity which = more time for the exhaust gases to escape. Had it wrong this whole time. Made my self look like an idiot across 5 different forums =='

Can anyone tell me if what i just said is true =p

Edited by Deza3000

Back pressure is the term used by the average punter who doesn't know what they are talking about and have just heard other people talking about it.

Back pressure is an unwanted side affect from having an exhaust that has optimum at lower rpm (the rpm where the majority of the population drive at, and for highway speeds). Once you increase the airflow in a restrictive exhaust, so does the back pressure, and the increase in power output slows. If you increase the exhaust size you increase the overall airflow capacity, but at low airflow you lose some of the scavenging effect and can have more turbulent airflow, resulting in lower power output (at low rpm) compared to the smaller exhaust. You would have a higher power output at higher revs though. So there is a trade off.

Back pressure is the term used by the average punter who doesn't know what they are talking about and have just heard other people talking about it.

Exactly this, pisses me off when I hear people talking about it

Spoiler

WHY ELSE WOULD DRAG CARS RUN OPEN HEADERS!!!

Edited by Nikk_666

They are blown though. But still, they put a lot if time into getting the length of those headers right

Not all drag cars with open headers are blown, for example pro stock cars run open headers...

LOL just looked at my exhaust and noticed that my car had a butterfly exhaust from factory, hence why i lost power when i put that canon =='

Wut?

Also did some research and found out that velocity as well as a warm exhaust increase flow and reduces back pressure, thats why proper exhaust systems produces more power than straight pipes.

Wut?

wider pipes = less velocity which = more time for the exhaust gases to escape. Had it wrong this whole time. Made my self look like an idiot across 5 different forums =='

And wut?

:blink:

Wut?

Wut?

And wut?

:blink:

Judging by your wuts, ive still got it wrong? Im just repeating what i read on a few articles lol.

1. my car does have a butterfly exhaust from factory, theres a valve on the right tip which opens under full throttle, it came factory from nissan. My mates r33 has it as well. Ill take a picture and show you if you want. That canon i used to have was from 2 years ago when all i wanted was noise but then realized it looked stupid and i lost a tonne of power so i chucked it out.

2. The article i read was explaining the dynamics of an exhaust system, it explained how in a straight pipe exhaust, the gases escaping the chamber tend to cool down as the travel through the exhaust pipe causing, the cold exhausts travels at a slower rate than warmer exhausts. I just repeated what it said. Which is probably why expensive exhausts are made of titanium, better conductors of heat.

3, With wider pipes, (im talking like 4inch all the way down) also moves exhaust gases at a slower rate, he used a metaphor describing how water comes out through a hose, a bigger wider hose causes the water to be released slowly while a more smaller hose releases water at a much quicker rate, Its the same principal with exhaust gases. So a straight pipe all the way down wont really perform as well as a proper exhaust. Hypothetically why else would you pay thousands of dollars for a exhaust system if a straight pipe does the exact same thing.

this is my understanding on what ive read about, however you seem to know better so maybe you'd care to explain.

Btw cheers for making me feel like an idiot =)

That butterfly has nothing to do with performance, it's for those who want their car quiet as fark when tootling around but to have a bit of a note to it when they put the foot down.

That butterfly has nothing to do with performance, it's for those who want their car quiet as fark when tootling around but to have a bit of a note to it when they put the foot down.

You sure about that, ive opened the valve manually before, the note does sound much deeper but from what ive seen, in any butterfly exhaust when the valve opens up it does give a bit more performance in the higher rpm. Lower rpm the valve remains closed to increase velocity (quicker flow rate for the exhaust gases to escape) since theirs limited exhaust pulses being released,

http://www.gomog.com...ckpressure.html

The link explained everything pretty well. It also indirectly explains why straight pipes are silly.

Edited by Deza3000

ok, for starters, you can't compare water coming out a hose to an exhaust. there are very much different principles going on (as far as the source of the pressure, and the lack of temp change). there are a few similarities, but also some big differences. water coming out a small hose will have a much higher pressure, meaning that it takes more pressure to move. in an engine, that means more pressure/resistance on the piston trying to force the gases out of the combustion chamber, or slowing down the speed of a turbo.

secondly, the reason they make expensive exhausts out of Ti is because of weight. Ti is a poor conductor of heat compared to mild steel.

you don't get a straight pipe exhaust because you need mufflers and the exhaust has to fit under the car. if you were to have an exhaust that was designed perfectly to accomodate the cooling gas, it would start big and get smaller, but not with steps to make it smaller. it would be like a long extruded cone.

when it comes to headers though, there is many theories on what works, and how they deliver power. you will see ones that are a 4 into 1 design, while others are a 4-2-1 design. this will alter performance, as will the length of the primaries and secondaries.

at the end of the day, discussing the finer details of exhaust design is best left to people who have a decent grasp on the principles (which i don't really class myself as having. i have enough to get me a somewhat decent idea, but am a dunce compared to someone who has studied aero-thermodynamics). it's fine for the average punter to discuss it in a broad discussion as they will often be debating things that will make bugger all difference (like debating the difference between 2.25" and 2.5" on a NA skyline).

ok, for starters, you can't compare water coming out a hose to an exhaust. there are very much different principles going on (as far as the source of the pressure, and the lack of temp change). there are a few similarities, but also some big differences. water coming out a small hose will have a much higher pressure, meaning that it takes more pressure to move. in an engine, that means more pressure/resistance on the piston trying to force the gases out of the combustion chamber, or slowing down the speed of a turbo.

secondly, the reason they make expensive exhausts out of Ti is because of weight. Ti is a poor conductor of heat compared to mild steel.

you don't get a straight pipe exhaust because you need mufflers and the exhaust has to fit under the car. if you were to have an exhaust that was designed perfectly to accomodate the cooling gas, it would start big and get smaller, but not with steps to make it smaller. it would be like a long extruded cone.

when it comes to headers though, there is many theories on what works, and how they deliver power. you will see ones that are a 4 into 1 design, while others are a 4-2-1 design. this will alter performance, as will the length of the primaries and secondaries.

at the end of the day, discussing the finer details of exhaust design is best left to people who have a decent grasp on the principles (which i don't really class myself as having. i have enough to get me a somewhat decent idea, but am a dunce compared to someone who has studied aero-thermodynamics). it's fine for the average punter to discuss it in a broad discussion as they will often be debating things that will make bugger all difference (like debating the difference between 2.25" and 2.5" on a NA skyline).

TLDR :yes:

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Who did you have do the installation? I actually know someone who is VERY familiar with the AVS gear. The main point of contact though would be your installer.   Where are you based in NZ?
    • Look, realistically, those are some fairly chunky connectors and wires so it is a reasonably fair bet that that loom was involved in the redirection of the fuel pump and/or ECU/ignition power for the immobiliser. It's also fair to be that the new immobiliser is essentially the same thing as the old one, and so it probably needs the same stuff done to make it do what it has to do. Given that you are talking about a car that no-one else here is familiar with (I mean your exact car) and an alarm that I've never heard of before and so probably not many others are familiar with, and that some wire monkey has been messing with it out of our sight, it seems reasonable that the wire monkey should be fixing this.
    • Wheel alignment immediately. Not "when I get around to it". And further to what Duncan said - you cannot just put camber arms on and shorten them. You will introduce bump steer far in excess of what the car had with stock arms. You need adjustable tension arms and they need to be shortened also. The simplest approach is to shorten them the same % as the stock ones. This will not be correct or optimal, but it will be better than any other guess. The correct way to set the lengths of both arms is to use a properly built/set up bump steer gauge and trial and error the adjustments until you hit the camber you need and want and have minimum bump steer in the range of motion that the wheel is expected to travel. And what Duncan said about toe is also very true. And you cannot change the camber arm without also affecting toe. So when you have adjustable arms on the back of a Skyline, the car either needs to go to a talented wheel aligner (not your local tyre shop dropout), or you need to be able to do this stuff yourself at home. Guess which approach I have taken? I have built my own gear for camber, toe and bump steer measurement and I do all this on the flattest bit of concrete I have, with some shims under the tyres on one side to level the car.
    • Thought I would get some advice from others on this situation.    Relevant info: R33 GTS25t Link G4x ECU Walbro 255LPH w/ OEM FP Relay (No relay mod) Scenario: I accidentally messed up my old AVS S5 (rev.1) at the start of the year and the cars been immobilised. Also the siren BBU has completely failed; so I decided to upgrade it.  I got a newer AVS S5 (rev.2?) installed on Friday. The guy removed the old one and its immobilisers. Tried to start it; the car cranks but doesnt start.  The new one was installed and all the alarm functions seem to be working as they should; still wouldn't start Went to bed; got up on Friday morning and decided to have a look into the no start problem. Found the car completely dead.  Charged the battery; plugged it back in and found the brake lights were stuck on.  Unplugging the brake pedal switch the lights turn off. Plug it back in and theyre stuck on again. I tested the switch (continuity test and resistance); all looks good (0-1kohm).  On talking to AVS; found its because of the rubber stopper on the brake pedal; sure enough the middle of it is missing so have ordered a new one. One of those wear items; which was confusing what was going on However when I try unplugging the STOP Light fuses (under the dash and under the hood) the brake light still stays on. Should those fuses not cut the brake light circuit?  I then checked the ECU; FP Speed Error.  Testing the pump again; I can hear the relay clicking every time I switch it to ON. I unplugged the pump and put the multimeter across the plug. No continuity; im seeing 0.6V (ECU signal?) and when it switches the relay I think its like 20mA or 200mA). Not seeing 12.4V / 7-9A. As far as I know; the Fuel Pump was wired through one of the immobiliser relays on the old alarm.  He pulled some thick gauged harness out with the old alarm wiring; which looks to me like it was to bridge connections into the immobilisers? Before it got immobilised it was running just fine.  Im at a loss to why the FP is getting no voltage; I thought maybe the FP was faulty (even though I havent even done 50km on the new pump) but no voltage at the harness plug.  Questions: Could it be he didnt reconnect the fuel pump when testing it after the old alarm removal (before installing the new alarm)?  Is this a case of bridging to the brake lights instead of the fuel pump circuit? It's a bit beyond me as I dont do a lot with electrical; so have tried my best to diagnose what I think seems to make sense.  Seeking advice if theres for sure an issue with the alarm install to get him back here; or if I do infact, need an auto electrician to diagnose it. 
    • Then, shorten them by 1cm, drop the car back down and have a visual look (or even better, use a spirit level across the wheel to see if you have less camber than before. You still want something like 1.5 for road use. Alternatively, if you have adjustable rear ride height (I assume you do if you have extreme camber wear), raise the suspension back to standard height until you can get it all aligned properly. Finally, keep in mind that wear on the inside of the tyre can be for incorrect toe, not just camber
×
×
  • Create New...