Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I was in exactly the same boat. I asked my workshop what they think. Seeing as they were tuning and installing the clutch.

They said it will be fine. I did however see them do a run in period on the dyno.

It will be interesting to see what others think.

My clutch is still brand new but it's holding up fine. I'm not launching or clutch kicking. Just driving normally.

i have exedy HD which isnt that old, but im not sure if it will hold upto 300kw on the dyno, so am thinking bout doing the 300kw clutch to make sure theres no issues, and the dyno time isnt wasted.

anyone has an opinion on wether i should just see what happens or definetly fit the 300kw clutch.

Edited by SliverS2

FIt the new clutch for sure. No point getting on the dyno and the old ones slips during power run. Also expensive to have everything apart twice.

The bedding process is most important to stop it slipping instead of engaging when you let the clutch in or out. Once it is fully engaged it is much less likely to start slipping, dis-engaging again. They won't be dropping the clutch on the dyno

BTW make sure the flywheel is machined unless it is new. Uneven surface from the old clutch, especially if was badly worn, on the old flywheel is the biggest risk.

I have taken new clutches straight to the race track for full power launches. Only had one of them fail due to not being bedded in properly (had a small contact patch, got to hot and clutch welded to flywheel).

i think i will put the clutch in to save dissapointments on dyno day, im thinking the NPC 300kw rated organic clutch

couple of questions

1) What is the proper clamping pressure that i need for the result just so i know what im buying?

2) I want a good bite and a firm to quite firm pedal so does this mean i want SPRUNG or UNSPRUNG center if that makes sense? ( not sure what makes the pedal feel more firm)

the exedy i have has a soft pedal feel and lacks a good bite, so i dont wanna get it wrong.

i think i will put the clutch in to save dissapointments on dyno day, im thinking the NPC 300kw rated organic clutch

couple of questions

1) What is the proper clamping pressure that i need for the result just so i know what im buying?

2) I want a good bite and a firm to quite firm pedal so does this mean i want SPRUNG or UNSPRUNG center if that makes sense? ( not sure what makes the pedal feel more firm)

the exedy i have has a soft pedal feel and lacks a good bite, so i dont wanna get it wrong.

the answer to both those questions will be answered by the good folk at NPC, just talk to them and tell them what you want.. but if you are going to be running 300kw surely you would get something rated a bit higher so your not right on the clutches limit?

sprung or solid centre is not what determines pedal firmness :thumbsup:

Exactly.

yeah thats true, i have bad memories of the 5puck clutch that was in there 6months ago, i couldnt drive it and it was shaking the crap out of the whole driveline,

so that power level is probably verging on the edge of the organics limit and more in the ceramic button zone, is the cushioned button clutch anything like the 5puk?

cause its really the two options i think for around 300kw, also i dont often hang on the redline or do dumps/drifting etc

my uses is 80% easy driving streets and 20% drags so id expect a clutch to last a long time

I have a npc 650hp sprung button clutch and it drives beautifully.

I think my previous 5puck may have been worse than it should of cause the flywheel must be a bit worped, when it got taken off the car it was only wearing on one half,

I drove it for a week and just couldnt get used to it, the gearbox was taking a hammering, was making all sorts of noises, was thinking it was going to break.

I hear the NPC 300kw clutch is a good one, maybe it can be made slightly stronger again to handle a bit more

what do you guys think about the Exedy sports organic, on the kudosmotorsport site, they have 3 options

225kw, 285kw and 330kw( 2922lbf clamping pressure which is 50% increase over standard)

there $534 ,

what do people think about the 330kw option?? would that be as good as the NPC clutch or a cushioned button?

I'm using the 300kw NPC organic, on a 305kw GTR, but i'm gentle on clutches. Very happy with it, as its easy to use in heavy traffic. My previous 240kw rated clutch handled 305 without slipping, but when the throw out bearing died it was a good opportunity to put something more suitable in.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Thanks for the reply mate. Well I really hope its a hose then not engine out job
    • But.... the reason I want to run a 60 weight is so at 125C it has the same viscosity as a 40 weight at 100C. That's the whole reason. If the viscosity changes that much to drop oil pressure from 73psi to 36psi then that's another reason I should be running an oil that mimics the 40 weight at 100C. I have datalogs from the dyno with the oil pressure hitting 73psi at full throttle/high RPM. At the dyno the oil temp was around 100-105C. The pump has a 70psi internal relief spring. It will never go/can't go above 70psi. The GM recommendation of 6psi per 1000rpm is well under that... The oil sensor for logging in LS's is at the valley plate at the back of  the block/rear of where the heads are near the firewall. It's also where the knock sensors are which are notable for 'false knock'. I'm hoping I just didn't have enough oil up top causing some chatter instead of rods being sad (big hopium/copium I know) LS's definitely heat up the oil more than RB's do, the stock vettes for example will hit 300F(150C) in a lap or two and happily track for years and years. This is the same oil cooler that I had when I was in RB land, being the Setrab 25 row oil cooler HEL thing. I did think about putting a fan in there to pull air out more, though I don't know if that will actually help in huge load situations with lots of speed. I think when I had the auto cooler. The leak is where the block runs to the oil cooler lines, the OEM/Dash oil pressure sender is connected at that junction and is what broke. I'm actually quite curious to see how much oil in total capacity is actually left in the engine. As it currently stands I'm waiting on that bush to adapt the sender to it. The sump is still full (?) of oil and the lines and accusump have been drained, but the filter and block are off. I suspect there's maybe less than 1/2 the total capacity there should be in there. I have noticed in the past that topping up oil has improved oil pressure, as reported by the dash sensor. This is all extremely sketchy hence wanting to get it sorted out lol.
    • I neglected to respond to this previously. Get it up to 100 psi, and then you'll be OK.
    • I agree with everything else, except (and I'm rethinking this as it wasn't setup how my brain first though) if the sensor is at the end of a hose which is how it has been recommended to isolate it from vibrations, then if that line had a small hole in, I could foresee potentially (not a fluid dynamic specialist) the ability for it to see a lower pressure at the sensor. But thinking through, said sensor was in the actual block, HOWEVER it was also the sensor itself that broke, so oil pressure may not have been fully reaching the sensor still. So I'm still in my same theory.   However, I 100% would be saying COOL THE OIL DOWN if it's at 125c. That would be an epic concern of mine.   Im now thinking as you did Brad that the knock detection is likely due to the bearings giving a bit more noise as pressure dropped away. Kinkstah, drop your oil, and get a sample of it (as you're draining it) and send it off for analysis.
    • I myself AM TOTALLY UNPREPARED TO BELIEVE that the load is higher on the track than on the dyno. If it is not happening on the dyno, I cannot see it happening on the track. The difference you are seeing is because it is hot on the track, and I am pretty sure your tuner is not belting the crap out of it on teh dyno when it starts to get hot. The only way that being hot on the track can lead to real ping, that I can think of, is if you are getting more oil (from mist in the inlet tract, or going up past the oil control rings) reducing the effective octane rating of the fuel and causing ping that way. Yeah, nah. Look at this graph which I will helpfully show you zoomed back in. As an engineer, I look at the difference in viscocity at (in your case, 125°C) and say "they're all the same number". Even though those lines are not completely collapsed down onto each other, the oil grades you are talking about (40, 50 and 60) are teh top three lines (150, 220 and 320) and as far as I am concerned, there is not enough difference between them at that temperature to be meaningful. The viscosity of 60 at 125°C is teh same as 40 at 100°C. You should not operate it under high load at high temperature. That is purely because the only way they can achieve their emissions numbers is with thin-arse oil in it, so they have to tell you to put thin oil in it for the street. They know that no-one can drive the car & engine hard enough on the street to reach the operating regime that demands the actual correct oil that the engine needs on the track. And so they tell you to put that oil in for the track. Find a way to get more air into it, or, more likely, out of it. Or add a water spray for when it's hot. Or something.   As to the leak --- a small leak that cannot cause near catastrophic volume loss in a few seconds cannot cause a low pressure condition in the engine. If the leak is large enough to drop oil pressure, then you will only get one or two shots at it before the sump is drained.
×
×
  • Create New...