Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Just wondering if anyone knows anything about Jasma

Exhausts or where I might find some...

Everyone I've asked has no idea, and the websites

are all Japanese (which I'm no good at)

Thanks in advance

btw. the badge number on this particular exhaust is.

JASMA

051

96-000 509

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/39526-info-on-jasma-exhausts/
Share on other sites

JASMA = Japan Automotive Sports Muffler Association.

It's a standard that; if the muffler is constructed accordingly, they company making the muffler can weld on the JASMA badge. It's all about quality control, JASMA exhausts have to meet a 96db limit, amongst other things.

My Fujitsubo is Jasma rated at being quieter than stock - except between 4000 and 6000 RPM. Just where the EPA test it :P

The Fujitsubo site has good Jasma info - as well as dB ratings for all products - even sound samples!

Main site:

http://www.fujitsubo.co.jp

My exhaust:

http://www.fujitsubo.co.jp/search/prod-v.p...cnamID=00000514

Thanks Rezz... do u know whether its any good? or shud i sell it..

what do u suggest?

thnx again!

If it was my exhaust, I'd give it a good buffing and get it all shiny, and run it on the car for a while... I can't say that the Dual Dragger are THAT common, so in that case I'd hang on to it, unless of course you don't fancy the dual canisters...

JASMA approved exhausts run under 96dB for stocko cars right?

Have u had any or know of any experience with the dual drager?

I cant get any info on it, thus dont know whether or not its worth

it getting it fitted... Dual Canisters are fine, performance wise is more

important imo

The HKS Dual Dragger came about because of some ground clearance issues with the normal Super Dragger muffler on some cars, also at the time, the dual canisters were the "in" thing... most of the big-name manufacturers had their own "Dual type" mufflers. I wouldn't think performance would be any worse than a usual Super Dragger exhaust system, although it'd be a bit heavier.

If performance is the important thing, the only thing I'd do is sell the Dual Dragger and get a Titanium exhaust (any brand)... the weight saving alone is worth it IMO.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
×
×
  • Create New...