Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

well as some of you know i fitted the sr 20 to my cefiro. it has a few mods t518z 10cm turbo, gtr cooler, 550 injectors, z32 afm and chip from dr drift.

we had it on the dyno the other day and made 203 rwkw @ 6500 rpm

full boost 3200 rpm and the thing pulls like a train the power curve is almost flat from 5 k rpm up. I need a custom exhaust manifold which I have to help the motor rev better and I'll fit a set ofcams as the sr responds well to them.

how is i well the car is great the handling is awsome the balance. do I regret not doing rb 25 no way. I"m very happy with the power and the delivery of the power. note how rich it is running so plenty more power in that tune

I'll keep it at this level for a few months then do the ex manifold and the cams. I cant wait to run it at the strip to see how close I am to that 12

the car weight 1380 so with the sr I reckon 1340 or so. itsgreat fun.

meggala

sr20cefiro04.jpg

srdyno2031.jpg

I think the 2540 or GT-RS is closer. The T518Z are bigger then the T517Z, for what its worht i think the T518Z are rated at 350hp, the 2530 is 320hp (I think???)

Cool to see ppl trying different setups, instead of the usual hi-flows and HKS 2530/2540 on their RB/SR 2L nissans... who did your cooler pipe Meggala

Nice work. I think you will have alot more to come. James from D1 Garage is using one of these turbos and making 251rwkw in his S14.5 @1.4bar - they are pretty popular on the drift scene over in Japan apparently.

Thats with HKS cams (256/264 from memory) manifold and adj cam gear (-4deg) too though, tuned at 11.5ish AF ratios - oh and he uses an 8cm housing, so its reasonable to believe that with the 10 you could make more.

Once again congrats, please keep the updates coming when you take the next steps.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
×
×
  • Create New...