Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi All,

I have a set of four Eibach springs that I bought to lower my car. I've now got Nismos, so don't need these any more.

1/2 a coil (from memory) was taken off the rears, because when I got them on, the rear was noticeably higher than the front- so probably suit RS/RX models more than ARX because they are a bit lighter. If it sits funny, just drop the fronts! :P

They are quite firm, I don't know the exact spring rates, but if you have super low profile tyres, yeah, I told you.

I don't want to fit them, I got enough shit to put on my own car! But I might be able to point you to someone who would for a price...

Only looking for $80, defiantly the cheapest way to lower your car.

Don't really want to ship, located in northern area of Sydney.

6949103066_680a79c1b3.jpg

IMG_4262[1] by PNM35, on Flickr

6949104586_f1b98d9c60.jpg

IMG_4261[1] by PNM35, on Flickr

Yes in the fronts- I think the rears are comparable. Hard to tell really because I did swaybars within a couple of days too, which stiffen things up a bit too.

Forgot to mention how low. They are lower than Nismo Springs, by about a finger on the wheel arch if that makes sense.

This is with them in I think. Wheels are standard overall diameter with 0.9% rolling diameter (obviously they are 19's but...)

6102147089_e1faf2a2b7_z.jpg

I don't think they would provide any significant drop to a Coupe. Coupes are .5 inch lower than sedans to begin with, so you might get another 0.5 maybe.

Better suited to sedans and M35s.

Thanks for your interest.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hope you aren't too sore after that one, might take a day or 2 to notice yet and I guess it is a loooooong drive home. On the bright side, tube frame front end is a thing at superlap, right?
    • https://www.facebook.com/share/p/18rmVb1SKB/ 
    • The chart of front pressure to rear pressure (with one being on the x axis and the other being on the y axis) is not a straight line on a typical proportioning valve. At lower pressures there is a straight line with one slope, and at higher pressures that changes to a lower slope. That creates a bend in the line at that pressure, called the knee point. If you do not change the proportionng as the pressure gets higher, you will suffer excessive pressure (at one end of the car or the other, depending on which way you look at the proportioning action) and then get lockups at that end. The HFM BM57, from my memory of previous discussions, is based on the BM57 from a different car (to a Skyline), with a different requirement for the location of the knee point and the distribution of pressure front to rear, and so is not a good choice for an upgrade on a Skyline. Here's a couple of links to some old posts, one from here, one from elsewhere. A lot of it pertains to adjustable prop valves, but the idea is the same. There are plenty of discussions on here about this issue from al the many years of people wanting a cheap/accessible option. https://grassrootsmotorsports.com/forum/grm/learn-me-brake-proportioning-valves/236880/page1/ https://grassrootsmotorsports.com/forum/grm/learn-me-brake-proportioning-valves/236880/page1/  
    • Yeah dunno why johhny posted that here with no context, just post on FB/insta bro where he put it up?  Laine had an off at T4 during Thurs prac, he's ok, car is less than perfect, they are done for the weekend, he can fill in the rest. Bando also binned it like 100m up the road.   
    • I feel there must have been a FB/insta post and the weekend did not start well at all I hope everyone is all okay
×
×
  • Create New...