Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hello gents,

I wanted to get some feedback related to the pics.. so just recently completed a full R33 rebuilding.. i've included Tomei cam gears and poncams.. the only problem visually I appear to have is the fact that Timing belt is about 1mm off the cam gears closer to the radiator. Tbelt does not appear to be walking as i've taken it all apart again to check the bottom pulleys and all is in check.. belt is in-line with all the side covers and doest move around, it just that it sits a nudge past the edge.

Anyone else encounter this? Prob is i never took a pic with OEM cam gears to see how it sat and measure the gears for comparison purpose.

All feedback is appreciated!

Tks!

14a62e8d.jpg

3c384273.jpg

558fb50c.jpg

Edited by hybrid_eg

I think the idler is missing the washer that sits behind it. Do u remember fitting this washer?

If u have a good look the idler pulley will be sitting closer to the head than the rest of the pulleys.

I thought the poncams were dialled in and were best suited to the stock position eliminating the need for cam gears? I could be wrong as i am mildly retarded but just thought thats what i had read?

Hey, you know what they say if it doesnt look right then it probably isnt and that doesnt look right.

Pull the front down again and recheck everything. if you have a service manual with a exploded view it will show all the washers and spacers go.

Once it is apart hopefully it will be obvious.

I have seen a few engines with the tomei gears and none have sat like this.

  • 5 weeks later...

As i remember everything was installed correctly reusing the washers.. the belt is not walking its just sitting in that position. Does anyone have a picture with same set up installed to see the position?

Both cams and cam gears?

As i remember everything was installed correctly reusing the washers.. the belt is not walking its just sitting in that position. Does anyone have a picture with same set up installed to see the position?

Both cams and cam gears?

Not the same setup, but this is my NEO and shows where the belt should sit if fitted correctly -

post-47580-0-59566700-1339547389_thumb.jpg

When the belt was installed, it was even with the cam gears.. however, the motor was run, the belt centered itself in the position where it seems to be off.. (original pictures).

The washers from the FSM are all there.. so i'm not sure what gives..

When the belt was installed, it was even with the cam gears.. however, the motor was run, the belt centered itself in the position where it seems to be off.. (original pictures).

The washers from the FSM are all there.. so i'm not sure what gives..

It indicates that something isnt lined up... The belt will generally straigten itself to the correct position as the crank gear kind of acts as a guide.... Either way, something is not right and i wouldnt be leaving it that way!

  • 2 weeks later...

When u take the lower timing belt cover off u will notice that the idler or tensioner or both are sitting too close to the block in relation to the rest of the pulleys.

There is a washer that normally sits between the block and the idler

  • 2 weeks later...

I didnt get a chance to take it all apart but took some more pics to share.. From what I can see on the manual instructions on tensioner there is only a spring in front of it.. od idler, nothing.. So i'm not sure why everyone is advising it could be a washer when its not pictured in the manual? There is a washer in front of the bolt that wil not offset distance between pulley and block.

This is weird..

726b558d.jpg4256cf0d.jpg29c9de6c.jpg

Edited by hybrid_eg

I've recently installed some tomei cam gears. The timing belt should definitely not be sitting so far forward. I noticed at one stage that the spring on the tensioner can actually fall behind the tensioner pulley which then makes the tensioner pulley not sit square. This can then make the timing belt move forward. Maybe the spring on the tensioner is between the tensioner and block - try checking that maybe...If you just keep cranking it over manually, the belt should stay pretty well centered. Basically something is making the timing belt 'move' forward from its standard position. The question is what...

Good luck. I would not conitnue until I had this resolved and fixed....

I'm taking it apart on Thursday to check spring, and measure everything to see what gives.. also keep in mind originally I had the belt flpped the wrong way ( didnt see the mark on the Tbelt) and really thought that could have been it, when belt was reintalled it was put in the correct position, however when motor starts it moves forward.. and stays in that position.. it doesnt walk like you would see on a stretched belt..

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • As far as I can tell I have everything properly set in the Haltech software for engine size, injector data, all sensors seem to be reporting proper numbers.  If I change any injector details it doesnt run right.    Changing the base map is having the biggest change in response, im not sure how people are saying it doesnt really matter.  I'm guessing under normal conditions the ECU is able to self adjust and keep everything smooth.   Right now my best performance is happening by lowering the base map just enough to where the ECU us doing short term cut of about 45% to reach the target Lambda of 14.7.  That way when I start putting load on it still has high enough fuel map to not be so lean.  After 2500 rpm I raised the base map to what would be really rich at no load, but still helps with the lean spots on load.  I figure I don't have much reason to be above 2500rpm with no load.  When watching other videos it seems their target is reached much faster than mine.  Mine takes forever to adjust and reach the target. My next few days will be spent making sure timing is good, it was running fine before doing the ECU and DBW swap, but want to verify.  I'll also probably swap in the new injectors I bought as well as a walbro 255 pump.  
    • It would be different if the sealant hadn't started to peel up with gaps in the glue about ~6cm and bigger in some areas. I would much prefer not having to do the work take them off the car . However, the filler the owner put in the roof rack mount cavities has shrunk and begun to crack on the rail delete panels. I cant trust that to hold off moisture ingress especially where I live. Not only that but I have faded paint on as well as on either side of these panels, so they would need to come off to give the roofline a proper respray. My goal is to get in there and put a healthy amount of epoxy instead of panel filler/bog and potentially skin with carbon fiber. I have 2 spare rolls from an old motorcycle fairing project from a few years back and I think it'd be a nice touch on a black stag.  I've seen some threads where people replace their roof rack delete with a welded in sheet metal part. But has anyone re-worked the roof rails themselves? It seems like there is a lot of volume there to add in some threads and maybe a keyway for a quick(er) release roof rack system. Not afraid to mill something out if I have to. It would be cool to have a cross bar only setup. That way I can keep the sleek roofline that would accept a couple bolts to gain back that extra utility  3D print some snazzy covers to hide the threaded section to be thorough and keep things covered when not using the rack. 
    • Probably not. A workshop grade scantool is my go to for proper Consult interrogation. Any workshop grade tool should do it. Just go to a workshop.
    • In my head it does make sense to be a fuel problem since that is what I touched when cleaning the system. When I was testing with the fuel pressure gauge, the pressure was constantly 2.5 bar with the FPR vacuum removed. When stalling, the pressure was going up to 3.0 bar (which is how it should be on ignition).
    • ECUtalk pages don't mention they support the ABS computer (consult port has more than one CAN), so you might just need a different scan tool. But, I would expect ABS is a different light to the brake warning/handbrake light, do you see an ABS light come on for a few seconds when you turn the key from ACC to IGN? But since you said: I'd have a look at the ABS sensors in the rear hubs to make sure they are not damaged, disconnected etc.
×
×
  • Create New...