Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Microtech LT12s has an AUX output, you need to set up a relay thats triggered from the output, the AUX can be set with RPM on and off. Should see a decent midrange gain from the VCT, it will have to be retuned.

Edited by 51NNA

Nothing wrong with microtech's, i've had 3 car that run them! They never gave me any problems an did everything i needed it to do, no point in buying a ecu with all the bells and whistles if u never use them!

fark it annoys me when ppl post garabage like this about computers... Im sure it will do more then enough for what most ppl neeed.... I never had a problem...

Doesn't mean it is a good idea to run it !

I bet I could set up a carby blow through set up on my rb25 and it would be "good enough" and if it worked I could say "without a problem" as well.

The stock ECU has better tunability than a microtech, it has more features and does an all round better job at every single part of running a car.

You have paid money for a down grade.

Nothing wrong with microtech's, i've had 3 car that run them! They never gave me any problems an did everything i needed it to do, no point in buying a ecu with all the bells and whistles if u never use them!

You are right I don't ever use my nice cold start, my idle air valve control that automatically adjusts when the AC comes on, I also don't need fuel economy via an O2 sensor.

Actually Rolls, fuel economy is one place where it is so much easier with a Microtech than with Nistune. It's really hard to lean out the cruise section in Nistune. It's a doddle with a Microtech.

You cannot argue against the statement that a Microtech actually does a decent job of running a fairly simple engine like an RB. Sure, you miss out on a few things, but they do work, and are fairly easy to tune (once you're used to their arse backwards electronic carby way of doing things). I'd much rather have a Microtech than pretty much any Haltech that's ever been released.

Yeah I know they work, but the lack a lot of the handy factory features that the factory ECU has. You can lean out cruise on a nistune the same way if you want, just turn off O2 feedback and pull fuel out until you are happy, or if you are lazy just leave the O2 feedback on and it'll be about the same as the factory fuel economy if you don't stuff things up too much.

  • 1 year later...

quote by rolls, "I like to construct strong views on random things, and then argue for absolutely no reason about them." some one needs a hug? anyone in Adelaide can help out?

before you flame me rolls, i agree with you about functionality of the nistune, however they carry an awsome reputation for results built from racing results! They are designed for high reving rotary's with fast and reliable processing time.

  • Like 1

quote by rolls, "I like to construct strong views on random things, and then argue for absolutely no reason about them." some one needs a hug? anyone in Adelaide can help out?

before you flame me rolls, i agree with you about functionality of the nistune, however they carry an awsome reputation for results built from racing results! They are designed for high reving rotary's with fast and reliable processing time.

Awesome rep from back in the day when they were a great ECU, it is like getting a magazine from the 90s where windows 95 and a pentium 200 was amazing, doesn't mean it still stands up that well today, sure if all you want to do is run excel from the nineties it probably does it well (eg running a rotary that used to be carby fed), but once again doesn't mean it is great today.

There "fast and reliable processing time" is slower and no less reliable than any new ECU.

Edited by Rolls

They are an absolute bucket of shit. Customer support is pathetic, you can't do a thing with them unless handing over wads of cash and the software sucks balls. We had to send a rb25 one back to get something as simple as a thermo fan output enabled, which is yet something else they charge you for.

The vct can be turned on and off in the aux screen.

Actually Rolls, fuel economy is one place where it is so much easier with a Microtech than with Nistune. It's really hard to lean out the cruise section in Nistune. It's a doddle with a Microtech.

what? just highlight the cells you want and press 'O' then drop the value to whatever you want.. it's dead beat simple... I've used Microtech before, it's so damn confusing.

1x table for RPM vs. Timing, then 1x table for Timing trim vs. Load... no sure why they just didn't want to use a 3D map like other people.

what? just highlight the cells you want and press 'O' then drop the value to whatever you want.. it's dead beat simple... I've used Microtech before, it's so damn confusing.

1x table for RPM vs. Timing, then 1x table for Timing trim vs. Load... no sure why they just didn't want to use a 3D map like other people.

Yup. Unless you wanted to keep closed loop. And perhaps you've not tried to do it on a more modern Nissan ECU? VE tables make it hard to know if you're achieving anything at all. You can't switch off feedback on a per cell basis on those anyway.

I'm not defending Microtech by the way. They are unpleasant to tune, as I stated in my original post. But especially back when the only Nissans being played with were RB20s and CA18s, they did a good job, and did return excellent fuel economy - far better than stock.

Yup. Unless you wanted to keep closed loop. And perhaps you've not tried to do it on a more modern Nissan ECU? VE tables make it hard to know if you're achieving anything at all. You can't switch off feedback on a per cell basis on those anyway.

I'm not defending Microtech by the way. They are unpleasant to tune, as I stated in my original post. But especially back when the only Nissans being played with were RB20s and CA18s, they did a good job, and did return excellent fuel economy - far better than stock.

I do find that the Nistune O2 closed loop is funny, it's quite lazy. I prefer to just set at stoich of the bat for idle/cruise etc. and I turn it off as it comes on song. It tries to stoich coming onto boost which makes the car feel lazy. I've only ever used it on a R33 and S15s nothing newer so perhaps you're right.

Do many people tune nistunes with the O2 feedback off?

you always need to disable O2 feedback whilst tuning, then re-enable it once you're done.. however I just leave it off completely on the idle/cruise cells.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Ok i will get those 310mm. I found one but on a different site. This is the description on those...is it ok? Technical parameters: - Axle: front. - Disc type: ventilated. - Number of holes: 5. - Disc diameter: 310mm. - Total height with center: 54mm. - Thickness (new/min.): 30/28mm. - Designed for brake calipers manufacturer: Sumitomo.
    • You Gregged a whole racetrack!?
    • Look for broken wire or bad connector at the motor. Might not be it, but is worth starting there, as it is easy.
    • Hi everyone, I’m having an issue with my R32 GT-R. Sometimes, when the car goes over a bump or experiences some vibration, the 4WD warning light comes on the dashboard. When I check the code from the control unit in the trunk, it shows Code 19 – ETS Motor. However, everything seems to be working fine — if I turn off the engine and restart the car, the light goes away and everything functions normally. Has anyone experienced this before? Where should I start troubleshooting this issue? Thanks in advance!
    • I'm back from the dyno - again! I went looking for someone who knew LS's and had a roller dyno, to see how it shaped up compared to everything else and confirm the powerband really is peaking where Mr Mamo says it should. TLDR: The dyno result I got this time definitely had the shape of how it feels on the road and finally 'makes sense'. Also we had a bit more time to play with timing on the dyno, it turns out the common practice in LS is to lower the timing around peak torque and restore it to max after. So given a car was on the dyno and mostly dialled in already, it was time for tweaking. Luis at APS is definitely knowledgable when it came to this and had overlays ready to go and was happy to share. If you map out your cylinder airmass you start seeing graphs that look a LOT like the engine's torque curve. The good thing also is if you map out your timing curve when you're avoiding knock... this curve very much looks like the inverse of the airmass curve. The result? Well it's another 10.7kw/14hp kw from where I drove it in at. Pretty much everywhere, too. As to how much this car actually makes in Hub Dyno numbers, American Dyno numbers, or Mainline dyno numbers, I say I don't know and it's gone up ~25kw since I started tinkering lol. It IS interesting how the shorter ratio gears I have aren't scaled right on this dyno - 6840RPM is 199KMH, not 175KMH. I have also seen other printouts here with cars with less mods at much higher "kmh" for their RPM due Commodores having 3.45's or longer (!) rear diff ratios maxing out 4th gear which is the 1:1 gear on the T56. Does this matter? No, not really. The real answer is go to the strip and see what it traps, but: I guess I should have gone last Sunday...
×
×
  • Create New...