Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey all,

So I was driving home on friday afternoon in the rain when suddenly I started to feel my rear shocks oscilations much much more than usually. I thought I may have punctured a tire from a pot hole or some other debris so I pulled over. Inspected my tires, all seemed fine. Checked my tire pressures, were a bit low so today (after not driving since friday) pumped them up to 40psi (235/R18s all round) and took her for a test. Problem still persists. Once home I did a shock bounce test and found them to still feel solid. (I have BC BR coil overs only about a year old). I have mine set relatively firm because of how low the car is with no guards rolled, keeps me from scrubbing ;) .

Anyhow, decided to jack the car up and down in the rear end to make sure the shockies were still expanding and retracting with and without load. All seemed normal. Now I'm a little stumped. I hadn't felt or heard anything break before I started feeling the excessive bounce. The BC BR Coilovers are less than a year (if not just comming up to a year) old so I wouldn't imagine they'd have seized or failed already.

I've got one theory (which I can't test until I get tools from the workshop tomorrow night) but perhaps if I back the firmness of the coils in the back off a little more, it may allow the shocks to absorb more of the shock rather than it being transfered to the wheels. I haven't seen any obvious bushes 'flogging' out when I had it last on the hoist either, that's not to say something hasn't happened spontaneously though.

So I am stumped for now. Any one else had this problem?

In Short:

Problem:

Boucy rear end

Fixes Tried:

- Tyre Pressures

- Inspectated Tyres (fronts are new and rears use to be the front so they still have tread)

- Suspension Bounce test

- Jacked up rear to inspect load and no load operation of coil overs

Yet to try:

- Softening up the rear coils via adjustable dampening dials.

Edited by Reflector

Um, you do realise that adjusting the dampers (softer) is not adjusting the springs, and will in fact make the suspension more bouncy?

Excessively hard damping will make the rear jittery and jumpy, which you may feel as being bouncy (or mis-describe as being bouncy). But bouncy is really when the springs are stiff and the loads are high enough to compress the springs but the dampers are not strong enough to control the oscillations of the springs after they get compressed.

To my knowledge the springs in the coils control/can be adjusted to vary the ride hieght which is adjust before being put into the car. I'm nearly certain that means that the actual spring itself does not vary in stiffness. The damping adjustment controls both rebound and compression - effectively what a shockie would do in a shock and spring style set up. I'm sure they'd have the information on the BC racing website.

Also lower your tyer pressure 40psi high and very hard. Try 34 psi. You may notice a difference also try some 17" rims as you will have more side wall to absorb the shock from the road

I used to have 19's I ran at 38psi no problems. Think the problem lies elsewhere

Also lower your tyer pressure 40psi high and very hard. Try 34 psi. You may notice a difference also try some 17" rims as you will have more side wall to absorb the shock from the road

34psi is too low for high profile tyres. Have always run 38-40psi in my 18" and never had a problem.

That being said, the problem seems to have gone away. After jacking the car up and releiving the coils of the load, my ride seems back to it's relatively firm state. Also was able to drive it through similar conditions (ie wet weather) and the same path on the weekend and there didn't seem to be a re-occurance of the problem. Perhaps the coils temporarily got stuck? Will be aware in any sudden change though if it happens again.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hi all,   long time listener, first time caller   i was wondering if anyone can help me identify a transistor on the climate control unit board that decided to fry itself   I've circled it in the attached photo   any help would be appreciated
    • I mean, I got two VASS engineers to refuse to cert my own coilovers stating those very laws. Appendix B makes it pretty clear what it considers 'Variable Suspension' to be. In my lived experience they can't certify something that isn't actually in the list as something that requires certification. In the VASS engineering checklist they have to complete (LS3/NCOP11) and sign on there is nothing there. All the references inside NCOP11 state that if it's variable by the driver that height needs to maintain 100mm while the car is in motion. It states the car is lowered lowering blocks and other types of things are acceptable. Dialling out a shock is about as 'user adjustable' as changing any other suspension component lol. I wanted to have it signed off to dissuade HWP and RWC testers to state the suspension is legal to avoid having this discussion with them. The real problem is that Police and RWC/Pink/Blue slip people will say it needs engineering, and the engineers will state it doesn't need engineering. It is hugely irritating when aforementioned people get all "i know the rules mate feck off" when they don't, and the actual engineers are pleasant as all hell and do know the rules. Cars failing RWC for things that aren't listed in the RWC requirements is another thing here entirely!
    • I don't. I mean, mine's not a GTR, but it is a 32 with a lot of GTR stuff on it. But regardless, I typically buy from local suppliers. Getting stuff from Japan is seldom worth the pain. Buying from RHDJapan usually ends up in the final total of your basket being about double what you thought it would be, after all the bullshit fees and such are added on.
    • The hydrocarbon component of E10 can be shittier, and is in fact, shittier, than that used in normal 91RON fuel. That's because the octane boost provided by the ethanol allows them to use stuff that doesn't make the grade without the help. The 1c/L saving typically available on E10 is going to be massively overridden by the increased consumption caused by the ethanol and the crappier HC (ie the HCs will be less dense, meaning that there will definitely be less energy per unit volume than for more dense HCs). That is one of the reasons why P98 will return better fuel consumption than 91 does, even with the ignition timing completely fixed. There is more energy per unit volume because the HCs used in 98 are higher density than in the lawnmower fuel.
    • No, I'd suggest that that is the checklist for pneumatic/hydraulic adjustable systems. I would say, based on my years of reading and complying with Australian Standards and similar regulations, that the narrow interpretation of Clause 3.2 b would be the preferred/expected/intended one, by the author, and those using the standard. Wishful thinking need not apply.
×
×
  • Create New...