Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi All Just a quick question about cam timing.When i got the motor rebuilt the Exhaust cam was 2 teeth out in Advance, This caused the turbo to boost alot earlier on but caused missfire up at top end. I have a rb25det with ATR43G3 installed. I noticed once i reinstalled the timing back to normal Turbo has lost alot of response. I have read in alot of previous comments about cam gears and saw somewhere that the intake\exhaust cam gear advanced\retarded XX Degrees help bring on power earlier but didnt increase top end. Just wondering if anyone could shed some light on this. Yes i know i will need a re tune but any comments would be greatly appreciated.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/401771-exhaust-cam-timing-rb25det/
Share on other sites

Thanks for that . I corrected the timing my self when i replaced the head gasket and made sure everything lined up and triple checked before i turned the key. As i said car did give me a lot more lag. I did read somewhere about the adjustable cam gear and them bringing boost on earlier but it was some time ago.

I know there's no real difference with adjustable intake cam gears even if they preserve vct, but whats the general concensus on exhaust cam gears for rb25dets? Do they produce any worthwhile gains over the standard cam gear?

Edited by Mitcho_7

They shift the power band downwards - there may be a small drop at max revs but more power in the mid range - I can't remember the number but its worth the effort.

I think your move moving the band upwards, if your retarding it your delaying the closing of the exhaust valve so this is not going to improve anything but mid and top end power, you allowing the engine to breath when the revs are higher,

When your advance it your closing the exhaust valve earlier so more efficient responsive on bottem and some mid but not efficient at the top end cause the motor cant breath as well

My tuner said the cam gears see most gains on engines without cams, if you have cams they dont produce as good a gains, and you will loose bottem end to give to top end, i dont have cam gears and my idle is as lumpy as a wrx,

My RB25DET had 2 cams both stock. I think adjustable cam wheels are not that useful on aftermarket cams such as poncams or special grinds because they are presumably tailored to suit. I have no experience with RB26 but apparently they benefit from tuning adjustable cam gears.

And Sliver/Silver S2 I might have got it the wrong way round (I don't think so) but I can assure you the benefit was to the midrange not the max power. Don't forget that by retarding you are also delaying the opening of the exhaust valve.

My RB25DET had 2 cams both stock. I think adjustable cam wheels are not that useful on aftermarket cams such as poncams or special grinds because they are presumably tailored to suit. I have no experience with RB26 but apparently they benefit from tuning adjustable cam gears.

And Sliver/Silver S2 I might have got it the wrong way round (I don't think so) but I can assure you the benefit was to the midrange not the max power. Don't forget that by retarding you are also delaying the opening of the exhaust valve.

haha, silverS2 it was supposed to be, your right it delays the opening so the exhaust valve , but i dont think its shifting power downwards, more like it increasing the filling of the cylinders and there efficiency at higher rpm ( more than 3000rpm) until they reach a restriction in the system, the drop at the top end your talking about is probably the turbo and exhaust manifold and system that start building backpressure which then becomes a traffic jam and decreasing or flatlining the top end, thats with a stock/small turbo, with my dyno graph you can see there is no loss or flatlining upto, its just keep climbing cause theres no restrictions.

advancing the cam would make the combustion more efficient by decreasing the overlap,

After a bit of research it seems 4 degrees retarded would be the way to go for the exhaust cam on a rb25det

I think that's right but ideally you would be doing it during a tune so you could see the effect on the dyno.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Nah, OEM washer bottle and brake fluid reservoirs are fine I don't know what it is with the plastic that Mazda used, some plastics, like the washer bottle and brake fluid res are fine, and still look new after 20 years use, where as the coolant expansion tank, and PS reservoir, that I replaced with new OEM items when I first got the car, turned yellow and started getting brittle a few years later If the dirty yellow stained plastics didn't trigger me there wouldn't be an issue, but they did, much like the battery bracket....... Meh As for going back to work full time to support car stuff, nope, why, because I own a Mazda NC MX5, not a Nissan R series Skyline 🤣
    • I've never heard of CJ-motor, so can't advise you on them. I'd just go straight to GCG for a GCG highflow though. Seems no point to use a middleman. I'm somewhat surprised that the price on the CJ site is lower than the GCG retail price. Even though CJ would get a discount of some sort, you would hardly expect them to give up so much margin. Maybe the price is out of date? Having said that "I'd go to GCG"...when I did my highflow, I went to Hypergear. I did this https://hypergearturbos.com/product/rb25dethighflow/#tab-dyno-results with the R34 OP6 450HP profile. With the BB centre (extra $400) and intially with the standard boost actuator, but I eventually got him to send me the high pressure one when I got to the point of being able to actually use it. Ends up costing the same sort of money as the GCG highflow, but this is, of course, the turbo that I KNOW has a shorter length core and so moves the comp cover rearwards. The GCG apparently doesn't do that. My mechanic also swears by the GCG highflow, given that we have another turbo rebuilder who does something essentialy the same as theirs, using Garrett wheels. He says it stands up at really low revs and makes good power. I haven't pushed my HG highflow past ~240-250rwkW yet (should have a little more in it, but unclear how much) and it does have a fairly gentle boost ramp. OK, it's much better now that I have gotten my boost controller tuned up on it.  A lot of my earlier unhappiness was because I couldn't keep the wastegate flap as closed as it needed to be (including some mechanical issues). I'd still prefer it to boost up nearly as quickly as the stocker, and it certainly a bit slower than that. So maybe the GCG one is worth the first look (for you).
    • Ok thanks 🙂 I will higly consider this. Any "known" company for a good reviews and experience to send that off? Is that CJ-motor good one? Or go straight to GCG site? I need to use VPN to even find some of those "shops" let alone access them 🙂 
    • You can literally put in as much WMI as it takes to quench the combustion totally (and then back it off a little, obviously), and it will keep making more and more power. The power comes from the cooling effect of the water (and the meth) and the extra fuel (the meth, which also has massive octane). It is effectively exactly like running E85. One might be slightly better than the other, but they are damn close. But with either you can lean on the boost or the timing (or both) waaaay more than with just petrol and the results are similar. Here's the first thing I googled for an anecdotal bit of evidence. Can't access the attachment without being a gold member, but it is there for the getting if able to, or searched up elsewise perhaps. https://www.hpacademy.com/forum/general-tuning-discussion/show/wmi-vs-e85/
    • Dang, those BBS are so nice! 
×
×
  • Create New...