Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey guys,

Im looking at getting a new set of rims. Was going to get te37's, but they're way too out of my price range, so I'm looking at getting the Varrstoen te37 replica's.

I have stock 17's on my r34 gtt, with no mods on suspension or anything.

I want an awesome concave look, but im not sure what the best offset for me would be because I'm a beginner with rims.

Just wondering if anyone could post photo's or give me advice (or both?) to as what the best offset would be for a great concave look, without having to roll any guards or worrying about it effecting my driving/handling.

This is the type of concave look I want:

http://www.flickr.com/photos/21305018@N02/6343962604/

http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2759/4069703590_fa2b605c72_o.jpg

http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2471/5735999005_03950fd01e_z.jpg

thanks!

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/402450-te37-or-varrstoen-offets/
Share on other sites

hey thanks for the link,

Like i said, i'm new to tyres/rims and just wondering how to find out the rim and tyre width of what i have?

On my tyre it says "235/45 17"

I know the "17" is my rim diameter, but i don't know the tyre width or the rim width im running at the moment.

Sorry, i probably sound really dumb lol, but yeh just wanting to learn

It will usually say inside the rim when you take it off how wide it is and the offset aswell, if you cant find can always just measure it up. In regards to offset basically if you can roughly work out how much further you want the rims you have now to sit out, then once you know the specs of current rims you can do some calculations or easier yet stick the info into a online offset calcualtor along with the size your looking at.

It will give you how much further they will sit out and protrude on the inside, from there you play aorund til you get around the figure you calculated in the start of how far you would like the your current rims to come out.

Pretty sure stock 34 Gt's are 17 x 8" offset maybe around +38 or something even more factory fail???

personal opinion if i was youuuuuuuuuuuu... i was in same position when i got my Rota Grid 18x10 for my gtr.

Now ive seen the Varrstoen, i would go them! for the pure and simple fact of looks (also suppose to be lighter than the Rota's).

varrstoen actually look like the TE37, Rota's have a really much more aggressive spoke profile.

To see this have a look at Varrstoen and Rotas on a 32 Gtr or 34 Gtr and you will see, Varrstoen have that nice sunken in face with the still agressive spokes.

And thats why i would go varrstoen 'next time'.

have a look at what the other 34 Gt boys are running offsets etc wise, if you wanna be hella flush join stance nation.

Most guys go for an appropriate fit or a tough stance. roll guards (if need be) run good offsets good tyre profiles and will look ace mate.

hope that helps! sorry i dont know 34 GT-T specs, only know 32 Gtrs mostly

if you want concave but still reasonable offsets, the go the varrstoen 18x9.5 +30.

You won't have to roll your guards with that lind of offset, but +22 would be even better looking.

I'm planning to go Varrstoens 2.2.1 +30.

ohok,

I was thinking of actually getting 17x9.5 +22 for now, basically because I just bought new tyres a few months ago and i dont want to spend on a whole new set of tyres.

But in saying that, is +22 a good looking (concave) offset that wont require guard rolling, or would it require some work?

I'm also a little confused. I haven't actually measure the width of my stock rims atm, but my tyres say its 235mm wide, which is 9.25inches when i googled it. Would that make my rims 17x9 or 17x9.5?

thanks

It doesnt matter the width of your tyres you can put 235 on a 8 inch or 11 inch rim you need to measure the width of the rim itself.

In regards to 9.5 +22 should be alright depending on how low your car is but at worst all youll need is roll guards which isnt big deal wouldnt need a flare.

I'm 80% sure on an r33 gtst the +30 in 9.5" will not clear the brakes on the front because of the flatter spoke profile on the varrstoens compared to rotas.

Pretty sure they also hit the upper control arm on full lock on the inside.

The 34's have a similar wheel fitment for front and rear as the 33's from memory.

So if you want +30 9.5" you'll need to run a small spacer. Better of going the +22 I think.

Edited by Mitcho_7

my car is pretty much stock, so not low at all. In terms of a small offset, does it give a more concave look?

Also, how much approximately is rolling of guards (if i dont need it for these rims, then maybe in the future if i get my car lowered or something so i know a general price)

thanks for the info guys

  • 2 months later...

ok i got my car lowered using the ultra low king springs and it rides comfortably. Now that i got paid (lol), my next step is to order these varrstoen bad boys.

SO, new questions:

Will i have any problems fitting 17X9(or9.5) +12 or +22's? Which offset would you guys recommend for my concave desire? lol

thanks :)

Rule of thumb, the wider the rim and lower the offset the more concave they will be.

Go: 17x9.5 +22 REAR

17x9 +22 FRONT

This will fit without any issues, with tire stretch.

I'm going 18x10.5 +30 FRONT, 18x10.5 +22 REAR - But I'm getting +25mm wide front fenders and a +20mm flare at the rear

  • 9 months later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • forgot to mention that when it does this it does not kill the engine, but I have not kept the pedal down long enough to let it, as I see no reason to beat up on it as its got to be something simple, small and dumb causing this.  And as soon as I let off pedal, the engine returns to its normal super smooth operation and rpms re-stabilize quickly, once below 4k. 
    • neither stumble or cut really seem to be an appropriate term....hard to explain its like a rev limiter but at 4k, but it violently shakes engine and entire vehicle as the rpms will not rise over 4k, even with slow acceleration. as soon as it hits 4k, it sounds like entire spark is lost entirely. plugs were 1.1 which I used as such, but later put in new plugs gapped down to .8 changed back after issue arose when I replaced the coils, still does it with either plug gap...damn and it was all running so good.
    • Oh how times have changed! I actually lean it out relative to my water/methanol injector duty cycle. The methanol adds a lot of fueling and you can then lean it out even more due to reduced knock. 
    • Yeah my thoughts are the same, a well thought out WMI setup, would be slightly ahead of just straight E85 and you're also chemically intercooling the charged air, dropping it even further. This is why you need to add so much more fuel as soon as you spray. I remember someone taking me through their set up before (Dennis, has a R33, lives around Cabramatta - no idea if he's still around on this forum). He would target AFR 10:1 on 98, then as WMI ramped on, AFR would lean back up to 11:1. Amazingly, he did this all through his PowerFC, a relay to cut power to his EBC solenoid if there was not enough line pressure on his WMI kit. And of course, if there wasn't any boost made above gate pressure, you wouldn't be accessing the load cells with heaps of timing for WMI. One downside to that rudimentary setup, once the WMI came on, the EBC would unleash the dragon, and of course all the timing. Tyres would fry lol.
    • Shimmed or shimless, still solid, no hydraulic pump up stuff.
×
×
  • Create New...