Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Greetings,

I need a little help with my Power FC.

I got a Power FC for my R34 GT-T and purchased 550cc drop injectors for it. This is all part of a build I am doing and I want the car to be able to run so that it can be driven to the tuner. I understand that you need to adjust the injector setting on the Power FC to account for the difference in stock injector size. Stock is 330cc correct? so 330/550 = 60% but you also need the latency information.

The did not come with the injectors and when I asked the seller I received this information:

Dead Times

Volts 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18

ms 1.144 1.033 0.923 0.833 0.744 0.672 0.600 0.528 0.456 0.384 0.312

So which one is the right one?

I would appreciate any help. Thanks.

Edited by debusan
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/405970-power-fc-help/
Share on other sites

That latency info you were given is the change in latency with different voltage applied. You also need the basic latency number. Having said that, given that they are probably meant work at around 13.5V, you will see that the latency at that voltage is about 650ms.

You can (and should) do your own research and use the part numbers on the injectors, coupled with 3 or 4 brain cells and Google, to look up the latency.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/405970-power-fc-help/#findComment-6467230
Share on other sites

That latency info you were given is the change in latency with different voltage applied. You also need the basic latency number. Having said that, given that they are probably meant work at around 13.5V, you will see that the latency at that voltage is about 650ms.

You can (and should) do your own research and use the part numbers on the injectors, coupled with 3 or 4 brain cells and Google, to look up the latency.

I appreciate your info, I have heard conflicting information on the size of the factory injectors and their latencies as well with what you just said that would put these ijectors as having near the same latency as the fatory ones which follows with them being drop ins as advertised.

One other thing,

Does anyone have the real info of the stock Rb25DET NEO injectors, as looking on google I have seen many dieeferent numbers from 330-380

With 380cc at .6ms appearing most often, Thanks

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/405970-power-fc-help/#findComment-6467256
Share on other sites

I know my nismo 555's were 62.5% and 0.18ms,

so its probably close to this, subtract your .7 from the new latency, so it looks like it will be around 0.20 ish??

if your cranking for too long your plugs will get wet, just thought id mention, cause once there wet its not going to work even with the right settings.. :yes:

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/405970-power-fc-help/#findComment-6467601
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hi all,   long time listener, first time caller   i was wondering if anyone can help me identify a transistor on the climate control unit board that decided to fry itself   I've circled it in the attached photo   any help would be appreciated
    • I mean, I got two VASS engineers to refuse to cert my own coilovers stating those very laws. Appendix B makes it pretty clear what it considers 'Variable Suspension' to be. In my lived experience they can't certify something that isn't actually in the list as something that requires certification. In the VASS engineering checklist they have to complete (LS3/NCOP11) and sign on there is nothing there. All the references inside NCOP11 state that if it's variable by the driver that height needs to maintain 100mm while the car is in motion. It states the car is lowered lowering blocks and other types of things are acceptable. Dialling out a shock is about as 'user adjustable' as changing any other suspension component lol. I wanted to have it signed off to dissuade HWP and RWC testers to state the suspension is legal to avoid having this discussion with them. The real problem is that Police and RWC/Pink/Blue slip people will say it needs engineering, and the engineers will state it doesn't need engineering. It is hugely irritating when aforementioned people get all "i know the rules mate feck off" when they don't, and the actual engineers are pleasant as all hell and do know the rules. Cars failing RWC for things that aren't listed in the RWC requirements is another thing here entirely!
    • I don't. I mean, mine's not a GTR, but it is a 32 with a lot of GTR stuff on it. But regardless, I typically buy from local suppliers. Getting stuff from Japan is seldom worth the pain. Buying from RHDJapan usually ends up in the final total of your basket being about double what you thought it would be, after all the bullshit fees and such are added on.
    • The hydrocarbon component of E10 can be shittier, and is in fact, shittier, than that used in normal 91RON fuel. That's because the octane boost provided by the ethanol allows them to use stuff that doesn't make the grade without the help. The 1c/L saving typically available on E10 is going to be massively overridden by the increased consumption caused by the ethanol and the crappier HC (ie the HCs will be less dense, meaning that there will definitely be less energy per unit volume than for more dense HCs). That is one of the reasons why P98 will return better fuel consumption than 91 does, even with the ignition timing completely fixed. There is more energy per unit volume because the HCs used in 98 are higher density than in the lawnmower fuel.
    • No, I'd suggest that that is the checklist for pneumatic/hydraulic adjustable systems. I would say, based on my years of reading and complying with Australian Standards and similar regulations, that the narrow interpretation of Clause 3.2 b would be the preferred/expected/intended one, by the author, and those using the standard. Wishful thinking need not apply.
×
×
  • Create New...