Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey all,

I have been doing as much reading as i can regarding how to get 350rwkw out of my R33 GTR.

At the moment all it has from the previous owner is a exhaust and some HKS Pods. Everything else is stock, including the turbo's.

I have done some research and have a bit of a parts list put together by Kudo's, but just wondering what you fellas think...The car is going to be my daily driver.

Garrett GT2860R-5s

Turbo Install Kit (all required gaskets & studs...)

Genuine Nissan Exhaust Manifold Stud Kit

A'PEXi Power FC D-Jetro

Greddy Suction Kit To Suit AFM Less Set-Up OR HKS AFM Replacement Bodies (To reuse factory intake set-up)

HKS EVC 5 Electronic Boost Controller

Walbro 400ltr/hr Intake Fump Pump OR Nismo Fuel Pump (Direct Replacement For Factory Pump, No Modifications Required)

Power Enterprise 700cc Fuel Injector Set, Including Full Genuine Nissan Seal Kit

Greddy Fuel Rail To Suit Above Injectors (anything above 550cc are 11mm and don't suit the factory rail)

Tomei Type-L Fuel Pressure Regulator

Do you think its nessasry to go MAP's vs Z32 AFM's?

After i install everything, will i even be able to drive to the tuner? I think i remember reading that the D-Jetro doesn't have a base tune installed so the car won't run?

Is it hard to install the MAP Sensors?

It is a pretty pricey build, anywhere where you fellas think i could save a few pennies? Honestly I am looking for the best performance for the dollar. What ever gives me best bang for buck, that is what i want to go for!

Input/comments/feedback much appreciated by all

Edited by Booki
  • Replies 40
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

have a look at the rb26 dyno thread,

but..... get ID 1000 cc injectors with adapters will fit std rail. dont need new fuel rail, Dont need pressure reg, z32 AFM is fine.... No mapless not needed.

-5's with 20 psi or so will give you 350...But may aswell aim for 400 :)

You after top end power, or response and a bit less top end?

Looking for more response and a bit less top end, it is my daily after all.

Didn't know you could get adapters to fit the std rail, any draw backs on not using a aftermarket fuel rail?

Main reason why i wondered about the Z32 vs MAP is because you can normally pickup Z32's and Power FC's used.

False economy considering secondhand Z32s. They might work, but there's always a good chance that someone is unloading them because they were faulty in some way. Not worth the pain. Buy new, genuine from someone you can trust (and that's unlikely to be someone on eBay).

Looking for more response and a bit less top end, it is my daily after all.

Didn't know you could get adapters to fit the std rail, any draw backs on not using a aftermarket fuel rail?

Main reason why i wondered about the Z32 vs MAP is because you can normally pickup Z32's and Power FC's used.

As per the infomation and results on here, Then i would say wrong turbo choice, Go for the -9s instead.

Although -

HKS EVC 5 Electronic Boost Controller

Might be known as one of the boost controllers with all its features etc, they CAN be a pain in the a$$ as mine is nothing but trouble....

I believe the -5's are capable of more power (if the need arises) and have similar response to stock turbo's if not better?

Yes, capable of more power - no, most definitely laggier.

Constantly gets err100 under full boost when its bolted up... When it swings free it works 9 times out of 10... Its probably a rare case but google search shows similar complaints out there but NO fix seems to exist that i can see...

Any reason why you would recommend the -9 instead of the -5?

I believe the -5's are capable of more power (if the need arises) and have similar response to stock turbo's if not better?

-5 are like hks 2530 and -9 like hks gtss, both more lag then stock, by the sounds of it you want -7/34n1 turbos

theres a good write up in someones sig (forget who) that has the turbos choice for the power wanted.

-9s wont make 350, But close enough and -7s will make 320 odd.

-5 although such a popular turbos are much better with a stoked motor, Or a track car where you can wind the boost up and really let them open up.

As your said yours is a daily, -5s would be usless below 4500 rpm, -9s would be biggest id go. And -7s would be the best choice for a daily street gtr.

The aboive pretty much sums it up, Have a search in my name for the many threads i made about -5 vs -9 ect ect.

Edited by sydking

Although -

HKS EVC 5 Electronic Boost Controller

Might be known as one of the boost controllers with all its features etc, they CAN be a pain in the a$$ as mine is nothing but trouble....

get an apexi avc-r , mine has never had trouble, is easy to work and has alot of adjustability

Still trying to decide if i want -5 or -9 turbo's.

How is the car revving before you reach full boost?

Also, How do you go about fitting bigger injectors in the stock fuel rail? or am i better off getting a bigger fuel rail? (where do i buy the adapters?)

Edited by Booki

Still trying to decide if i want -5 or -9 turbo's.

How is the car revving before you reach full boost?

Also, How do you go about fitting bigger injectors in the stock fuel rail? or am i better off getting a bigger fuel rail? (where do i buy the adapters?)

You said you car was a daily and wanted resposne, Unless you have a stroker kit then -9s are your only choice that matches your needs

As for injectors, Tuff car parts will do a set of adapters to suit std rail for about $50 a set.

Grab some Id 1000cc from tuspeed.com, Great service and good price at $745 odd

Edited by sydking

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • The rain is the best time to push to the edge of the grip limit. Water lubrication reduces the consumption of rubber without reducing the fun. I take pleasure in driving around the outside of numpties in Audis, WRXs, BRZs, etc, because they get all worried in the wet. They warm up faster than the engine oil does.
    • When they're dead cold, and in the wet, they're not very fun. RE003 are alright, they do harden very quickly and turn into literally $50 Pace tyres.
    • Yeah, I thought that Reedy's video was quite good because he compared old and new (as in, well used and quite new) AD09s, with what is generally considered to be the fast Yokohama in this category (ie, sporty road/track tyres) and a tyre that people might be able to use to extend the comparo out into the space of more expensive European tyres, being the Cup 2. No-one would ever agree that the Cup 2 is a poor tyre - many would suggest that it is close to the very top of the category. And, for them all to come out so close to each other, and for the cheaper tyre in the test to do so well against the others, in some cases being even faster, shows that (good, non-linglong) tyres are reaching a plateau in terms of how good they can get, and they're all sitting on that same plateau. Anyway, on the AD08R, AD09, RS4 that I've had on the car in recent years, I've never had a problem in the cold and wet. SA gets down to 0-10°C in winter. Not so often, but it was only 4°C when I got in the car this morning. Once the tyres are warm (ie, after about 2km), you can start to lay into them. I've never aquaplaned or suffered serious off-corner understeer or anything like that in the wet, that I would not have expected to happen with a more normal tyre. I had some RE003s, and they were shit in the dry, shit in the wet, shit everywhere. I would rate the RS4 and AD0x as being more trustworthy in the wet, once the rubber is warm. Bridgestone should be ashamed of the RE003.
    • This is why I gave the disclaimer about how I drive in the wet which I feel is pretty important. I have heard people think RS4's are horrible in the rain, but I have this feeling they must be driving (or attempting to drive) anywhere close to the grip limit. I legitimately drive at the speed limit/below speed the limit 100% of the time in the rain. More than happy to just commute along at 50kmh behind a train of cars in 5th gear etc. I do agree with you with regards to the temp and the 'quality' of the tyre Dose. Most UHP tyres aren't even up to temperature on the road anyway, even when going mad initial D canyon carving. It would be interesting to see a not-up-to-temp UHP tyre compared against a mere... normal...HP tyre at these temperatures. I don't think you're (or me in this case) is actually picking up grip with an RS4/AD09 on the road relative to something like a RE003 because the RS4/AD09 is not up to temp and the RE003 is closer to it's optimal operating window.
    • Either the bearing has been installed backwards OR the gearbox input shaft bearing is loosey goosey.   When in doubt, just put in a Samsonas in.
×
×
  • Create New...