Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

You should have access to the open beta as off now if you pre-purchased it.

Played it for a bit, feels like CSS with uprated graphics. You need to play with the settings though, stuff like mouse acceleration are on by default.

Other than that it plays really well.

  • 2 weeks later...

i bought this last week. was surprised to see it was only $15 on steam. not bad for gameplay. i think the skins need to be updated (t's and ct's are hard to tell apart) and the buy menu is definitely console oriented now. bit annoying that they changed the shortcut keys for a couple of things. still good fun though. havent played cs for the last year or 2 lol

As a CS player since the very first version in 1999 until now, I honestly say, congrats for attempting to botox some life into CS but I must say, it's just simply fcuking gay.

I would not recommend it to anyone. Overall the game seems and feels too animated. Not to mention silencers are out, the gayest tip of the dick is the new decoy grenade (does this even exist? LOL). You throw it like any grenade and it explodes into sound of gun fire for about 4 seconds.

CS Mod - Cool mod

CS 1.0 Stand alone - Good

CS 1.5 - Better

CS 1.6 - Great!

CS:CZ - Best CS out (in my opinion anyway, a good balance of graphics, not too stupidly animated but better than 1.6)

CS:S - Great-ish, better graphics but guns look like Go-Lo toys. This is the tip of the iceberg

CS:GO - A ride in a theme park. Tip of a gay's dick.

When I figured it was released, being a CS player for all these years, I impulsed into buying it, played the first minute in the training mode, was shit. Started a bot game thought it would be better LOL. After a fruitful win in the first round, the second round was an uninstall and delete.

As a CS player since the very first version in 1999 until now, I honestly say, congrats for attempting to botox some life into CS but I must say, it's just simply fcuking gay.

I would not recommend it to anyone. Overall the game seems and feels too animated. Not to mention silencers are out, the gayest tip of the dick is the new decoy grenade (does this even exist? LOL). You throw it like any grenade and it explodes into sound of gun fire for about 4 seconds.

CS Mod - Cool mod

CS 1.0 Stand alone - Good

CS 1.5 - Better

CS 1.6 - Great!

CS:CZ - Best CS out (in my opinion anyway, a good balance of graphics, not too stupidly animated but better than 1.6)

CS:S - Great-ish, better graphics but guns look like Go-Lo toys. This is the tip of the iceberg

CS:GO - A ride in a theme park. Tip of a gay's dick.

When I figured it was released, being a CS player for all these years, I impulsed into buying it, played the first minute in the training mode, was shit. Started a bot game thought it would be better LOL. After a fruitful win in the first round, the second round was an uninstall and delete.

Id be the same I think, not gonna even bother. I starting playing in 1.0, soo long ago now lol.. 1.3 was where it was at :D bunnyhopping all over the place haha. 1.6 was great till they removed the quick scope/nade trick with the awp! :( gave up after 1.6, sauce&CZ were terd!

Miss the days of online, ETG/gamesurge & all the clans some good guys in the community

You are half correct in saying that but if you played CS:S when that first came out, that wasn't very good either. However now it is "perfected" and is a great game.

Give CS:GO a year to sort out all the bugs that come along, and i am sure it can be a great game as well.

However, i have the same opinion like you, it does not have the same feel that 1.6 or CS:S has, feels redone, sluggish, slow. A let down in my eyes.

BTW CZ was the worst imo.

i bought this last week. was surprised to see it was only $15 on steam. not bad for gameplay. i think the skins need to be updated (t's and ct's are hard to tell apart) and the buy menu is definitely console oriented now. bit annoying that they changed the shortcut keys for a couple of things. still good fun though. havent played cs for the last year or 2 lol

yeah thats my only pain with the game... I have NFI which team I am meant to be shooting at haha

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Latest Posts

    • I drive the Tiguan much harder than the Skyline in all conditions, because it just grips and hooks, unlike the R33 shit box
    • The rain is the best time to push to the edge of the grip limit. Water lubrication reduces the consumption of rubber without reducing the fun. I take pleasure in driving around the outside of numpties in Audis, WRXs, BRZs, etc, because they get all worried in the wet. They warm up faster than the engine oil does.
    • When they're dead cold, and in the wet, they're not very fun. RE003 are alright, they do harden very quickly and turn into literally $50 Pace tyres.
    • Yeah, I thought that Reedy's video was quite good because he compared old and new (as in, well used and quite new) AD09s, with what is generally considered to be the fast Yokohama in this category (ie, sporty road/track tyres) and a tyre that people might be able to use to extend the comparo out into the space of more expensive European tyres, being the Cup 2. No-one would ever agree that the Cup 2 is a poor tyre - many would suggest that it is close to the very top of the category. And, for them all to come out so close to each other, and for the cheaper tyre in the test to do so well against the others, in some cases being even faster, shows that (good, non-linglong) tyres are reaching a plateau in terms of how good they can get, and they're all sitting on that same plateau. Anyway, on the AD08R, AD09, RS4 that I've had on the car in recent years, I've never had a problem in the cold and wet. SA gets down to 0-10°C in winter. Not so often, but it was only 4°C when I got in the car this morning. Once the tyres are warm (ie, after about 2km), you can start to lay into them. I've never aquaplaned or suffered serious off-corner understeer or anything like that in the wet, that I would not have expected to happen with a more normal tyre. I had some RE003s, and they were shit in the dry, shit in the wet, shit everywhere. I would rate the RS4 and AD0x as being more trustworthy in the wet, once the rubber is warm. Bridgestone should be ashamed of the RE003.
    • This is why I gave the disclaimer about how I drive in the wet which I feel is pretty important. I have heard people think RS4's are horrible in the rain, but I have this feeling they must be driving (or attempting to drive) anywhere close to the grip limit. I legitimately drive at the speed limit/below speed the limit 100% of the time in the rain. More than happy to just commute along at 50kmh behind a train of cars in 5th gear etc. I do agree with you with regards to the temp and the 'quality' of the tyre Dose. Most UHP tyres aren't even up to temperature on the road anyway, even when going mad initial D canyon carving. It would be interesting to see a not-up-to-temp UHP tyre compared against a mere... normal...HP tyre at these temperatures. I don't think you're (or me in this case) is actually picking up grip with an RS4/AD09 on the road relative to something like a RE003 because the RS4/AD09 is not up to temp and the RE003 is closer to it's optimal operating window.
×
×
  • Create New...