Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

What vacume are you seeing with your r33 at idle?

Im trying to work out if i have boost leak that could cause my R33 GTST car to be overboosting to around 13psi with the std actuator.

It was giving me 20psi vacume at idle but after checking some pipes its now 15psi vacume, the serario of boost leak cause overboosting is confussing me but it makes sence if the actuator doesnt get pressure?yet still im confussed lol

Im still learning with turbo cars and pressure turbo systems so please correct my thinking if its wrong?

I have worked out i am hitting boost cut at around 12 psi but what i cant work out is why im boosting that hard, no boost controller(directly hooked up to motor for min boost) Actuator feel free and shuts ok.

It was running ok for one day and held 10psi firm with no issues but now issues back.

I think its boost leak giving me boost creep from 10 to 12-13?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/407086-what-is-your-vacume-of-your-rb25det/
Share on other sites

boost creep is not to do with boost leaks its to do with the wastegate setup,

if you have a leak in the hose that connects to the wastgate then yes you'll have more boost,

did you hook it up correctly yet???

Edited by SliverS2

Not yet as only the std nipples are there(one in incooler pipe before throttle body im currently using and one nipple on bov return line i have blocked off)

im planning to tap the pipe just after the turbo soon as i buy a nipple and some epoxy type stuff..

What is annoying is that it was running ok the other day.

My blitz intercooler uses the std top engine pipes and crosses over under the cooler so top pipes are all still standard.

You can't really measure vacuum in psi.

Oh come on! That is not true. You can use any pressure unit you like to measure any positive or sub atmospheric pressure you like. There is no difference. The only argument that you can make is that psi is a stupid pressure unit that we should have stopped using in Australia in 1966 when we adopted the self consistent SI unit system.

Oh, and to the OP, the pressure you were seeing at -20 or -15 "units" was almost certainly not psi. Have a closer look at your guage. The boost side will probably be in psi, but the vacuum side will be in some other unit. FWIW, if your vacuum is only about 15-20 inches of Mercury (another stupid f*kking pressure unit) then you either have a sloppy motor or a leak.

Oh, and to the OP, the pressure you were seeing at -20 or -15 "units" was almost certainly not psi. Have a closer look at your guage. The boost side will probably be in psi, but the vacuum side will be in some other unit. FWIW, if your vacuum is only about 15-20 inches of Mercury (another stupid f*kking pressure unit) then you either have a sloppy motor or a leak.

This is more what I was getting at. People often put -15psi vacuum, when as far as I'm aware it would be more like a fraction of 1 psi, or a positive measurement in PSIa. I'm not going to start off the whole PSIa vs PSIg argument again. I dont like using -psi because theres not really any manufacturer, aftermarket or OEM that uses it

mmHg or inHg is used because it has a neutral, a positive and a negative. I've used a mmH20 gauge to measure blowby (From memory) on a diesel engine and it works really well, even if it doesnt make sense to alot of people.

Most gauges now are digital anyway, which makes it easier then carrying around a long mmH20 gauge everywhere

But most I've seen will change units when measuring boost vs vacuum. kPa negative, Kgcm^2 positive

Anyway back on topic:

As I said theres not alot of point in comparing setups as its to varied. Mine gauge will sit on -14 in summer and -16 in winter, and adjusting timing I can get it to sit anywhere between -18 and -12. I'm also running 3" Cooler piping which will make some difference

Not yet as only the std nipples are there(one in incooler pipe before throttle body im currently using and one nipple on bov return line i have blocked off)

im planning to tap the pipe just after the turbo soon as i buy a nipple and some epoxy type stuff..

What is annoying is that it was running ok the other day.

My blitz intercooler uses the std top engine pipes and crosses over under the cooler so top pipes are all still standard.

Never mind the epoxy just drill and tap the turbo housing.

This is more what I was getting at. People often put -15psi vacuum, when as far as I'm aware it would be more like a fraction of 1 psi, or a positive measurement in PSIa. I'm not going to start off the whole PSIa vs PSIg argument again. I dont like using -psi because theres not really any manufacturer, aftermarket or OEM that uses it

mmHg or inHg is used because it has a neutral, a positive and a negative. I've used a mmH20 gauge to measure blowby (From memory) on a diesel engine and it works really well, even if it doesnt make sense to alot of people.

Have you ever stopped to wonder what happens to "mm of arbitrary liquid" pressure units when the local gravity field is not 9.807 m/s^2 ?

There is only one pressure unit that we should be using. That is the Pascal, and its SI multiples and fractions.

I'm not arguing what we should and shouldnt use. I'm just saying what I have seen

Shouldn't have opened up that can of worms.

I'm not turning this into an argument, especially seen as I gave up physics years ago.

It's all good

think OP has disappeared anyway

Have you ever stopped to wonder what happens to "mm of arbitrary liquid" pressure units when the local gravity field is not 9.807 m/s^2 ?

There is only one pressure unit that we should be using. That is the Pascal, and its SI multiples and fractions.

i hope you also take into account change in local barometric pressure then if your getting that accurate

pretty sure most boost guages also work in psi or bar for positive pressure and mm/inHg for negative (mm/inches of mercury)

pretty sure most of the cars i've had have been around 10-15 inHg at idle

you are also not likely to detect a boost leak at idle as the silicone joiners that usually leak will be under vacuum and seal themselves against the pipe

but i have heard of people spraying start-ya-bastard on the joiners as you can head the engine pickup if some spray gets in

i hope you also take into account change in local barometric pressure then if your getting that accurate

pretty sure most boost guages also work in psi or bar for positive pressure and mm/inHg for negative (mm/inches of mercury)

Some people design equipment that gets used outside the Earth's local environment. If they were so backward as to use units of pressure that relied on the height of a column of liquid, then there was be at least 2 ways that they could have spectacular calculational failures. Just like when the Mars probe smacked into Mars instead of landing on it because one group of engineers was using SI units and the other was using US customary units. It is 2012. Time to give up on shithouse units. All I'm saying.

As to me correcting for local barrometric pressure....yes, in fact, when I am doing pitot measurements of air flows in industrial equipment (and various related exercises) I do in fact calculate the actual air density based on the actual local pressure (and elevation) and temperature. Of course I do. Anyone who doesn't is just being lazy.

Some people design equipment that gets used outside the Earth's local environment. If they were so backward as to use units of pressure that relied on the height of a column of liquid, then there was be at least 2 ways that they could have spectacular calculational failures. Just like when the Mars probe smacked into Mars instead of landing on it because one group of engineers was using SI units and the other was using US customary units. It is 2012. Time to give up on shithouse units. All I'm saying.

As to me correcting for local barrometric pressure....yes, in fact, when I am doing pitot measurements of air flows in industrial equipment (and various related exercises) I do in fact calculate the actual air density based on the actual local pressure (and elevation) and temperature. Of course I do. Anyone who doesn't is just being lazy.

fair enough if its something important and a variance in pressure is actually a big deal

i thought we were talking about boost gauges

i still don't get why jap boost gauges come in american units too

i'm all for metric units, it makes my life a lot easier

Hey guys, yeah i was not think right and yeah it's obvious now i think about it, boost pressure is way more than vacume would ever be,

The whole reason i was asking about vacume was seeing if it could be a diagnosis for boost leak, well good story today as i think my fmic was leaking.

One $4 clamp and no more overboost, coil pack type missfire feeling.

My car has actually never felt so crisp or fast, it boost well to around 9psi.

Before my car had a very soft but loud feeling, it would boost fast but i think it was free boosting?, with the air leak the power was very on or off, it felt sluggish and the exhaust was loud.

Anyway thankyou everyone for your input, ive now learned about the mercury system lol,hope my car cotinues to run well but fnger crossed.

I plead to everyone to check there car for air leaks, your car might be lagging and you dont even realise it, i thought my issue was coilpacks but now im thinking it wasnt even electrical.

If we do a forum catch up ,beers on me :)

Edited by cosworth1971

good to hear its fixed, but i would of thought the boost would of gone even higher after a boost leak was fixed...

when i fixed my boost leak it didnt drop in boost.

you sure you didnt just find a hidden boost controller or somthing?? :P

Edited by SliverS2

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Ps i found the below forum and it seems to be the same scenario Im dealing with. Going to check my ECU coolant temp wire tomorrow    From NICOclub forum: s1 RB25det flooding at start up Thu Apr 11, 2013 7:23 am I am completely lost on this. Car ran perfectly fine when I parked it at the end of the year. I took the engine out and painted the engine bay, and put a fuel cell with an inline walbro 255 instead of the in tank unit I had last year. After reinstalling everything, the engine floods when the fuel pump primes. if i pull the fuel pump fuse it'll start, and as soon as I put the fuse back in it starts running ridiculously rich. I checked the tps voltage, and its fine. Cleaned the maf as it had some dust from sitting on a shelf all winter, fuel pressure is correct while running, but wont fire until there is less than 5psi in the lines. The fuel lines are run correctly. I have found a few threads with the same problem but no actual explanation of what fixed it, the threads just ended. Any help would be appreciated. Rb25det s1 walbro255 fuel pump nismo fpr holset hx35 turbo fmic 3" exhaust freddy intake manifold q45tb q45 maf   Re: s1 RB25det flooding at start up Fri Apr 12, 2013 5:07 am No, I didn't. I found the problem though. There was a break in one of the ecu coolant temp sensor wires. Once it was repaired it fired right up with no problems. I would have never thought a non working coolant temp sensor would have caused such an issue.
    • Hi sorry late reply I didnt get a chance to take any pics (my mechanics on the other side of the city) but the plugs were fouled from being too rich. I noticed the MAF wasn't genuine, so I replaced it with a genuine green label unit. I also swapped in a different ignitor, but the issue remains. I've narrowed it down a bit now: - If I unplug and reconnect the fuel lines and install fresh spark plugs, the car starts right up and runs perfectly. Took it around the block with no issues - As soon as I shut it off and try to restart, it won't start again - Fuel pressure while cranking is steady around 40 psi, injectors have good spray, return line is clear, and the FPR vacuum is working. It just seems like it's getting flooded after the first start I unplugged coolant sensors to see if its related to ECU flooding but that didnt make a difference. Im thinking its related to this because this issue only started happening after fixing coolant leaks and replacing the bottom part of the stock manifolds coolant pipe. My mechanic took off the inlet to get to get to do these repairs. My mechanics actually just an old mate who's retired now so ill be taking it to a different mechanic who i know has exp with RBs to see if they find anything. If you have any ideas please send em lll give it a try. Ive tried other things like swapping the injectors, fuel rail, different fuel pressure regs, different ignitor, spark plugs, comp test and MAF but the same issue persists.
    • My return flow is custom and puts the return behind the reo, instead of at the bottom. All my core is in the air flow, rather than losing some of it up behind the reo. I realise that the core really acts more as a spiky heatsink than as a constant rate heat exchanger, and that therefore size is important.... but mine fits everything I needed and wanted without having to cut anything, and that's worth something too. And there won't be a hot patch of core up behind the reo after every hit, releasing heat back into the intake air.
    • There is a really fun solution to this problem, buy a Haltech (or ECU of your choice) and put the MAF in the bin.  I'm assuming your going to want more power in future, so you'll need to get the ECU at some stage. I'd put the new MAF money towards the new ECU. 
    • Any idea where I can get genuine MAF apart from used ones? I can't find any only for GTRs and unfortunately that price is not in my budget 🤣 I might gap my plugs down and put my splitfires in, they were only in for a year or so before I started the rebuild 
×
×
  • Create New...