Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

What if your engine has between 180 and 190 psi??

We've got a Snap-On gauge and an ABW gauge. I'll give you $50 if you can show me 190psi on your engine on either one.

*sub clause* as long as it is an unopened engine haha

so next question apperantly my motor is supposed to rebuilt 10000klms ago so id take a uneducated guess and say it wasnt obviously but since they are so close wouldnt that lessen the chance of me having bad blowby?

It doesn't mean it's not built. Forged engines can have lower static compression due to the forging being made from a different material than the factory piston. They can expand more when at temp so the piston to bore clearance is more than the factory cast piston when they are cold and even when they are hot. Just not as much.

I would say get a second test done at a different place and compare the result. Definitely make sure the engine is up to temp before pulling it apart.

Also get them to do a wet test and a leak down test. This will help you determine where the compression loss is occurring.

You could have valve train losses rather than ring problems and no, that won't give you excessive blowby

Oh and I forgot to add that 50psi is nothing compared to the 1500-2000psi your combustion chamber sees at peak power and cylinder pressure.

Engine A might have 2000psi whereas Engine B might have 1850-1950psi due to his lower static result. Both cars will make within 5-10 HP of one another and potentially live just as long as one another.

thanks for explaining all that..

Im not sure i quite get my head around some of that , if the motor were down 50psi at 400rpm i would of thought thats a 30% loss of gas.. so at peak power it would be 30% still? so thats more like 1400psi instead of 2000psi which would be more than 5hp loss?

comparing my E85result on 16psi to some others on 25psi, seems like my compression could be the difference to me.. thats what i though anyway.

Edited by SliverS2

thanks for explaining all that..

Im not sure i quite get my head around some of that , if the motor were down 50psi at 400rpm i would of thought thats a 30% loss of gas.. so at peak power it would be 30% still? so thats more like 1400psi instead of 2000psi which would be more than 5hp loss?

comparing my E85result on 16psi to some others on 25psi, seems like my compression could be the difference to me.. thats what i though anyway.

A lot of people think that but in actual fact it's not the case.

Once the gases passing the ring/ring gap reach supersonic speed, none more can pass no matter how much more pressure is added. Gasses reach supersonic at fairly low engine RPM

There are a couple of different types of electronic tests. Pulse test and cranking speed test.

The pulse test measures variations in manifold pressure I am fairly sure. The pulses will usually be off if the cylinder is down on compression. The cranking speed test is done by monitoring cranking speed. A cylinder with reduced compression will have less resistance and therefore the engine will crank faster on that part of the cycle. I am fairly sure it's like a timing light with a scope type rpm counter. I have used neither of these methods and have only ever heard about them. From what I was told, they are pretty accurate also. I don't know about the pulse test as measuring the cylinder on the intake stroke is not really going to be terribly accurate as most of the rings made for modern engines are torsional so they act differently on the downward stroke. I don't know enough about it to argue with someone about its accuracy though lol

We use cranking speed fairly regularly when we suspect a dead engine. We don't use a tester though. All you do is unplug the CAS and crank it over. Listen to the note of each stroke. If you are down on one cylinder, you will hear it quite easily.

Healthy engine will be: da da da da da da

Unhealthy will be: da da DA da da da f**k!

We've got a Snap-On gauge and an ABW gauge. I'll give you $50 if you can show me 190psi on your engine on either one.

*sub clause* as long as it is an unopened engine haha

Hey mate Ive had 3 compression tests done at the same place with all results showing 180 to 190. Not sure what gauge they have used but I understand what your saying. It is a built 2.8 though. So does that make a difference?

Hey mate Ive had 3 compression tests done at the same place with all results showing 180 to 190. Not sure what gauge they have used but I understand what your saying. It is a built 2.8 though. So does that make a difference?

Yeah if you have had the engine built and it's higher comp ratio, that will improve the normal results usually. You would only need to go up to 9.5:1 at most to see figures like that.

Do you run standard head gasket or a spacer multi layer?

There are a couple of different types of electronic tests. Pulse test and cranking speed test.

The pulse test measures variations in manifold pressure I am fairly sure. The pulses will usually be off if the cylinder is down on compression. The cranking speed test is done by monitoring cranking speed. A cylinder with reduced compression will have less resistance and therefore the engine will crank faster on that part of the cycle. I am fairly sure it's like a timing light with a scope type rpm counter. I have used neither of these methods and have only ever heard about them. From what I was told, they are pretty accurate also. I don't know about the pulse test as measuring the cylinder on the intake stroke is not really going to be terribly accurate as most of the rings made for modern engines are torsional so they act differently on the downward stroke. I don't know enough about it to argue with someone about its accuracy though lol

cheers for the info.. the reason i asked is with RACQ they do an electronic compression test.. when i bought my 33 it showed 5 cylinders were 95% and 1 cylinder at 90%.. it was hard to find any info on how it was calculated.. but i assumed the engine was still quite healthy.. 3 years on and its still boosts fine, doesnt drink oil etc..

Yep bore scope.

We have one at the shop for just such occasions. It really is surprising how many people sell cars under false advertising.

We can also tell if you have forged rods and ARP studs inside by looking up the sump plug hole

  • 6 months later...

Yeah if you have had the engine built and it's higher comp ratio, that will improve the normal results usually. You would only need to go up to 9.5:1 at most to see figures like that.

Do you run standard head gasket or a spacer multi layer?

Dan,

Can you tell me if you believe using a multilayer metal head gasket say 1.3mm would impact on the results and how so?

For anyone interested in how my car has from I believe 'worn' over time - was never tuned for a couple of years.

I didn't know the test was meant to be done at temp so results are cold:

Cyl./psi

DATE: 27/05/2010

1/155

2/150

3/150

4/150

5/155

6/150

DATE: 29/09/2012

1/155

2/152

3/ 145

4/145

5/151

6/150? (forgot to jot down but was fine)

Not sure what may have happened to cyl. 3&4 but was certainly lower. No matter how many times I tested it wishing it was a bad read.

Was certainly giving the motor a hard time untuned though.

I feel a lot better now though after reading this thread regarding the 'dynamic' vs static result of how the engine will actually perform. The spread

Cyl. 1 and 3/4 seems high?

Edited by tranman

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...