Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Heyy everyone this topic has prob been talked about befor i dont want to start any arguments or anything, everyone has there own believes. but just want to know some of the Gains use have gotten with replacing a factory r32 gtr cooler to a after market one. such as greedy, HKS, ARC ect.

Also if the engine is high comp (9,1) dos this play a role in how thick the cooler should be ect.

cheers Anz

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/409164-intercooler-gains/
Share on other sites

  • Replies 45
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

In the new PI magazine, the r32 gtr "gmaster" made 360kw with stock r32 cooler, then changed to an r34 cooler and made 380kw, then again changed to a cooling pro 76mm core and made 411kw....

All runs done on JEMs Dyno...

Once you get to those power levels, the little GTR cooler is probably causing a fair bit of pressure drop. Might still cool fairly well, but unloading the compressor will in turn unload the turbine, which reduces backpressure in the exhaust and lets the powers out.

well thats what i was thinking my car at 13 pound is making 290 not much gains to 17-18 psi the car runs fairly cold but there is a restriction somewhere and its all pointing to the cooler. . dumps front pipes ect are all big with no step downs.

im making 320kw at 17-18 pound atm but fuel pump needs direct feed its leaning out. with hks gtss.

Well I can only speak from the results I've personally seen. I had a Greddy upgrade core on my built GTR and -5s making 365rwkw @ 19psi.

My car:

- Made the same power

- Had the same response

- Almost identical intake temps after 5mins on circuit (talking less than 2 degree difference, cars had different front bars)

as cars with the same motor build/turbo config that utilised stock R32 GTR or stock R34 GTR cores. These were cars from the same tuner, using the same dyno.

I've also seen a GTR core flow 400rwkw on over 20psi from a 2.8ltr stroker, with the lap times to back up the performance.

IMO you would be wasting your money.

well thats what i was thinking my car at 13 pound is making 290 not much gains to 17-18 psi the car runs fairly cold but there is a restriction somewhere and its all pointing to the cooler. . dumps front pipes ect are all big with no step downs.

Garrett -9s (GT-SS) are only capable of making max of 330-340rwkw on 20-22psi... So 320rwkw @ 18psi sounds exactly right really.

Garrett -9s (GT-SS) are only capable of making max of 330-340rwkw on 20-22psi... So 320rwkw @ 18psi sounds exactly right really.

I've also had -9s prior and made 330rwkw on 19psi, using stock dump pipes - ran 124mph as well which is smack on the money for the power :thumbsup:

haha well im going to change my cooler and post up befor and after dino runs and see the differences. i honestly dont think the stock cooler can flow that much.

MPH never lies, so the proof would suggest otherwise (people said stock dumps couldn't either, but ive proven that wrong) :)

Make sure you do pressure drop testing as well :thumbsup:

Well I can only speak from the results I've personally seen. I had a Greddy upgrade core on my built GTR and -5s making 365rwkw @ 19psi.

My car:

- Made the same power

- Had the same response

- Almost identical intake temps after 5mins on circuit (talking less than 2 degree difference, cars had different front bars)

as cars with the same motor build/turbo config that utilised stock R32 GTR or stock R34 GTR cores. These were cars from the same tuner, using the same dyno.

I've also seen a GTR core flow 400rwkw on over 20psi from a 2.8ltr stroker, with the lap times to back up the performance.

Thing that I see from that is the tanks are the same and the internal cross sectional area of the core is the same. So, whilst they might be able to design the tubes to flow a little more than a standard GTR core, it's really very close to being the same cooler, in terms of how much flow it will do for a given pressure drop.

Edited by GTSBoy

Well this is where it always gets interesting :)

The core Nizpro use for their XR6 upgrades flows enough for 400-450rwkw and these cars are well proven. From memory it's roughly:

400mmL x 300mmH x 76mmD

Now look at a Greddy replacement size:

600mmL x 284mmH x 76mmD

If Nizpro cores that are pretty much the same size as a GTR core (GTR is actually larger)... and they flow easily 400rwkw... I don't see why it's so hard to believe a GTR one, or sized replacement, can't?

I've got it on good authority, as i was going to use one on my GTS-R, that the drop across the Nizpro core is only ~1.5psi which is fine in that volume as any less it won't be cooling enough given it's always a trade off between flow/cooling/size.

As for the XR6 cooler debate its really not a fair comparisson putting a 4L I6 next to a 2.6L I6.

The Barra can push out 320rwkw out of 12psi with not too much difficulty. Compare that to the conventional 18 - 20psi to get the same power level out of your typical twin setup RB (purely going by the results I have seen in the RB26 Dyno thread in the past).

Interested to see results Anz ! If you get your hands on a well priced hks/greddy/arc unit why not replace the 20 year old Nissan intercooler thats probably seen better days.

as cars with the same motor build/turbo config that utilised stock R32 GTR or stock R34 GTR cores. These were cars from the same tuner, using the same dyno.

I've also seen a GTR core flow 400rwkw on over 20psi from a 2.8ltr stroker, with the lap times to back up the performance.

sorry was this on BP pump or E85 / Water meth??

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • As discussed in the previous post, the bushes in the 110 needed replacing. I took this opportunity to replace the castor bushes, the front lower control arm, lower the car and get the alignment dialled in with new tyres. I took it down to Alignment Motorsports on the GC to get this work done and also get more out of the Shockworks as I felt like I wasn't getting the full use out of them.  To cut a very long story short, it ended up being the case the passenger side castor arm wouldn't accept the brand new bush as the sleeve had worn badly enough to the point you could push the new bush in by hand and completely through. Trying a pair of TRD bushes didn't fix the issue either (I had originally gone with Hardrace bushes). We needed to urgently source another castor arm, and thankfully this was sourced and the guys at the shop worked on my car until 7pm on a Saturday to get everything done. The car rides a lot nicer now with the suspension dialled in properly. Lowered the car a little as well to suit the lower profile front tyres, and just bring the car down generally. Eternally thankful for the guys down at the shop to get the car sorted, we both pulled big favours from our contacts to get it done on the Saturday.  Also plugged in the new Stedi foglights into the S15, and even from a quick test in the garage I'm keen to see how they look out on the road. I had some concerns about the length of the LED body and whether it'd fit in the foglight housing but it's fine.  I've got a small window coming up next month where I'll likely get a little paint work done on the 110 to remove the rear wing, add a boot wing and roof wing, get the side skirt fixed up and colour match the little panel on the tail lights so that I can install some badges that I've kept in storage. I'm also tempted to put in a new pair of headlights on the 110.  Until then, here's some more pictures from Easter this year. 
    • I would put a fuel pressure gauge between the filter and the fuel rail, see if it's maintaining good fuel pressure at idle going up to the point when it stalls. Do you see any strange behavior in commanded fuel leading up to the point when it stalls? You might have to start going through the service manual and doing a long list of sensor tests if it's not the fuel system for whatever reason.
    • Hi,  Just joined the forum so I could share my "fix" of this problem. Might be of use to someone. Had the same hunting at idle issue on my V36 with VQ35HR engine after swapping the engine because the original one got overheated.  While changing the engine I made the mistake of cleaning the throttle bodies and tried all the tricks i could find to do a throttle relearn with no luck. Gave in and took it to a shop and they couldn't sort it. Then took it to my local Nissan dealership and they couldn't get it to idle properly. They said I'd need to replace the throttle bodies and the ecu probably costing more than the car is worth. So I had the idea of replacing the carbon I cleaned out with a thin layer of super glue and it's back to normal idle now. Bit rough but saved the car from the wreckers 🤣
    • After my last update, I went ahead with cleaning and restoring the entire fuel system. This included removing the tank and cleaning it with the Beyond Balistics solution, power washing it multiple times, drying it thoroughly, rinsing with IPA, drying again with heat gun and compressed air. Also, cleaning out the lines, fuel rail, and replacing the fuel pump with an OEM-style one. During the cleaning process, I replaced several hoses - including the breather hose on the fuel tank, which turned out to be the cause of the earlier fuel leak. This is what the old fuel filter looked like: Fuel tank before cleaning: Dirty Fuel Tank.mp4   Fuel tank after cleaning (some staining remains): Clean Fuel Tank.mp4 Both the OEM 270cc and new DeatschWerks 550cc injectors were cleaned professionally by a shop. Before reassembling everything, I tested the fuel flow by running the pump output into a container at the fuel filter location - flow looked good. I then fitted the new fuel filter and reassembled the rest of the system. Fuel Flow Test.mp4 Test 1 - 550cc injectors Ran the new fuel pump with its supplied diagonal strainer (different from OEM’s flat strainer) and my 550cc injectors using the same resized-injector map I had successfully used before. At first, it idled roughly and stalled when I applied throttle. Checked the spark plugs and found that they were fouled with carbon (likely from the earlier overly rich running when the injectors were clogged). After cleaning the plugs, the car started fine. However, it would only idle for 30–60 seconds before stalling, and while driving it would feel like a “fuel cut” after a few seconds - though it wouldn’t fully stall. Test 2 – Strainer swap Suspecting the diagonal strainer might not be reaching the tank bottom, I swapped it for the original flat strainer and filled the tank with ~45L of fuel. The issue persisted exactly the same. Test 3 – OEM injectors To eliminate tuning variables, I reinstalled the OEM 270cc injectors and reverted to the original map. Cleaned the spark plugs again just in-case. The stalling and “fuel cut” still remained.   At this stage, I suspect an intermittent power or connection fault at the fuel pump hanger, caused during the cleaning process. This has led me to look into getting Frenchy’s fuel hanger and replacing the unit entirely. TL;DR: Cleaned and restored the fuel system (tank, lines, rail, pump). Tested 550cc injectors with the same resized-injector map as before, but the car stalls at idle and experiences what feels like “fuel cut” after a few seconds of driving. Swapped back to OEM injectors with original map to rule out tuning, but the issue persists. Now suspecting an intermittent power or connection fault at the fuel pump hanger, possibly cause by the cleaning process.  
×
×
  • Create New...