Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

http://www.ebay.com....=item564a2c469e

Good pads, and very cheap!

+ 1 for the A1RM

Use these on the front of my V35, work perfectly when cold and keep on working when they get hot

As good as the Ferodo DS2500 which I have also used in the past without the price

If you ever think that there is even a slim chance that you may take your car to the track get the A1RM you wont be sorry

+ 1 for the A1RM

Use these on the front of my V35, work perfectly when cold and keep on working when they get hot

As good as the Ferodo DS2500 which I have also used in the past without the price

If you ever think that there is even a slim chance that you may take your car to the track get the A1RM you wont be sorry

Yep +1 for the A1RM's. Holy crap they're brilliant. I used them on my 180sx track car/road car and they were absolutely perfect. Really little break dust too. Also, the guy at GSLRallysport deserves as much attention as he can get. Seriously the nicest guy I've ever dealt with. I remember ordering at 2pm and they were delivered to my door at 8:30 the next morning.

Also, he sells some TRW GP600 brake fluid for $65.00 and it's rated to 300ish degrees.

Edited by some.will.seek

Yep, I actually run the cheaper little brother (the HPX) and even they are FANTASTIC! Bang for buck they are awesome! And yes, GSL are awesome to deal with in every respect!

Thanks for the replies guys. I'll go for the one on eBay, Cheers. Oh what about rear pads? Should I go for the same brand?

Email GSL and tell them what you want and they will sort you out.

Yeah, give them a ring or send them an email. The last time I rang GSL, I got a full set of 4 DBA slotted rotors for $340 down from ~$800. So, it's worth giving them a ring to see.

Yep, that is crazy good ..... ring up another rotor company and I guarantee you that you won't even find a set of rotors for that price, let alone good pads as well :)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Input shaft bearing. They all do it. There is always rollover noise in Nissan boxes - particularly the big box. Don't worry about it unless it gets really growly.
    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
×
×
  • Create New...