Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

LOL looks like your the guniea pig. :)

Blew a late 1UZ on the dyno last night, the limit of its compressed powder rods was 300kw on ethanol. It made massive torque though before it fractured.

Eventually something will fail, the gamble is when and at what torque.

  • Like 1

Sorry to hear about the failure Scott, where were you tuning it?

Khaled, where are you getting yours tuned? Edge? I think your pushing your luck on a stock bottom end....once your around 400Kw on a RB26 and its a stock bottom end its no longer the tuner, some serious physics start to come into play, rod bolts stretch, big ends and piston pins start deforming, factory piston ring lands can only take so much.

Better talk to Barry about the costs of a forged bottom end before you fry it and end up with the car off the road and a big repair bill......your walking into high risk unchartered territory IMHO.

Then again you and Stef never listen to anyone anyway. :P

Edited by GTRPSI

Sorry to hear about the failure Scott, where were you tuning it?

Edge. I hope Barry isn't too pissed about the mess on the floor.

Luckily it was only at 3k, it would have made one hell of a mess at 7. No wonder they park that old Ford beside the dyno. lol.

  • Like 1

Sorry to hear about the failure Scott, where were you tuning it?

Khaled, where are you getting yours tuned? Edge? I think your pushing your luck on a stock bottom end....once your around 400Kw on a RB26 and its a stock bottom end its no longer the tuner, some serious physics start to come into play, rod bolts stretch, big ends and piston pins start deforming, factory piston ring lands can only take so much.

Better talk to Barry about the costs of a forged bottom end before you fry it and end up with the car off the road and a big repair bill......your walking into high risk unchartered territory IMHO.

Then again you and Stef never listen to anyone anyway. :P

I never once said I wanted 400kw though? I was just curious to know how many more people have accomplished this since this thread has started.

Also quite a few people are running 400+ on a stock 26 on e85. Its amazing how strong these rb's are.

Edited by drgtr7

I never once said I wanted 400kw though? I was just curious to know how many more people have accomplished this since this thread has started.

Also quite a few people are running 400+ on a stock 26 on e85. Its amazing how strong these rb's are.

Your not that far away now on 98 correct?

Nah you never said 400Kw...but your going to end up around it by the looks of things if you go E85. :)

I thought i heard Stef mention your were fiitting a E85 sensor to yours at JAK (or am i mixing you up with someone else)?

Yes RB's are strong, but get the revs up and thats when the strain starts to show, note Scotts comments about the engine he lost on E85 at 3K, allbeit with 1UZ stock rods.

@ Scotty, What do you think it was, the slow burn of the E85 putting out too much cyllinder pressure/torque on the rods, what sort of numbers were seen around the RPM when it popped, or do you think the rod was stressed from a previous dyno run when at song and bound to fail on the next run?

Bah, its only oil and frag to be cleaned, as long as any metal didnt meet any customers cars nearby, probably hear all about it next week.

Is your EVO back on the road?

Edited by GTRPSI

My car makes 800nm on the Edge dyno, the Soarer was making 1200nm at 10psi. Torque is what kills rods I imagine, and this had it in bulk. It would have been stressed from the previous runs, but the sintered rods just fracture and let go, no bending etc like you would see on a forged rod before it failed.

Yes, the Evo is running, just a few small issues to sort out and I can fit the 1400's and tune it.

  • Like 1
  • 8 months later...
  • 2 years later...

Thread bump

Update on my stock bottom end.

made 480-500kw on JEM's dyno with a 8374 w 1.05 rear on e85

- Mild head work with small cams

- stock crank, rods and pistons

- stock oil pump and sump

Ran 10.7 @ 134mph on 28ish psi in Sydney summary with 8374. Probably could go 136-138mph in the winter....

Am now inthe processing of upgrading to a 9180 w 1.05 rear.

Depending on how brave I'm feeling I'll tell the tuner to cap the power at 570kw-600kw (on JEM's dyno). It should be good for 140-145 mph.

Long live the stock bottom end.

Lots of big power stock bottom ends floating around. Would love to hear updates on the setups, particularly with:

- power on workshop dyno (lets be honest these do differ quite a lot)

- turbo with rear housing and psi

- basic engine mods

- fuel

Cheers

  • Like 2
42 minutes ago, usmair said:

Long live the stock bottom end.

Lots of big power stock bottom ends floating around. Would love to hear updates on the setups, particularly with:

- power on workshop dyno (lets be honest these do differ quite a lot)

- turbo with rear housing and psi

- basic engine mods

- fuel

Cheers

My first motor died after about 4 years with varying levels of power from 450kw to 550kw. It died a sad death when it dropped a valve guide (it had actually dropped 11 of them but the others had shot out the exhaust). Bottom end was still mint when it came out.

New motor has been going a few years with 520-567kw with a few different cam combos. Seems to love life and gets driven fairly hard at the track a lot and 1000m drags.

 

- power on workshop dyno (lets be honest these do differ quite a lot) 567kw on a dynapack hub dyno

- turbo with rear housing and psi Precision 6262 0.84 with just over 30psi

- basic engine mods mild ported head and smallish cams

- fuel United E85

  • Like 3
  • 3 months later...

Ok. Bit of an update 

Car is now running an EFR 9180. Still factory Nissan bottom end with factory pump and sump.

On 35 psi it made 580kw on JEMs dyno. 

Recent Sydney winter weather has been bumping up the boost and it's hit 39 psi a few times now and still survived. 

On 39 psi you'd think it'd be 610-630kw on the same dyno....??

 

20180519_211350.jpg

On 2/2/2018 at 1:41 PM, SimonR32 said:

My first motor died after about 4 years with varying levels of power from 450kw to 550kw. It died a sad death when it dropped a valve guide (it had actually dropped 11 of them but the others had shot out the exhaust). Bottom end was still mint when it came out.

New motor has been going a few years with 520-567kw with a few different cam combos. Seems to love life and gets driven fairly hard at the track a lot and 1000m drags.

 

- power on workshop dyno (lets be honest these do differ quite a lot) 567kw on a dynapack hub dyno

- turbo with rear housing and psi Precision 6262 0.84 with just over 30psi

- basic engine mods mild ported head and smallish cams

- fuel United E85

Up to 582kw these days (Mainline hub dyno), ran a 9.6 @ 146mph so power and speed match fairly well

Edited by SimonR32
  • Like 2
  • 7 months later...

Thread bump and update

So I ran 10.4 at 140.6 mph with the EFR 9180 at 2018 GTR festival. Turned it up to 11 for the next run and broke a rear shaft so only got one decent run.

Upon inspection of the Haltech data log we discovered the turbo was hitting 30 psi from 1 to 4th and would only see 35psi in 5th gear so safe to say I was a 50-60 KW short on the run. Profec B no good...

I now have boost by gear set up via an eboost2 and the the car has 37psi shoved down its throat with it tapering off to 34psi by redline.

Should help the MPH a bit I'd say

Ready to head back out to WSID once Sydney weather cools. 

A 9 second pass with a stock bottom end and 34 getrag is the goal. Don't think it's ever been done before,  especially in the heavier 33 GTR.... ??

Still all factory Nissan parts from the head down

  • Like 2

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hi guys, Making some space/cleaning up. A whole heap of random OEM R33 GTR parts and other random bits and bobs. I will update this thread as I go. Parts are located in Moorebank NSW 2170. Pickup preferred but will post at buyers expense. Prices are negotiable. If they don’t sell it will go in the bin. Item 1: BOV return pipe. $40 Item 2: RB26 cam gears. $20 Item 3: R33 GTR torque split, oil temp, boost centre gauge. $100 Item 4: RB26 fuel rail x 2. $20 each Item 5: RB26 Recirc valves. $50 Item 6: OEM upper front arms. $20 Item 7: Royal Purple Max Gear 75w-140 1 quart/946 ml x 5. $50 each or 5 for $200. Item 8: OS Giken 80w-250 diff oil 1 litre. $25 Item 9 Eibach springs. ers-11-140-60-0140. $100 https://www.streetfx.com.au/eib140-60-0060-eibach-ers-140mm-length-x-60mm-id-coil-over-spring?_ga_campaignid=22235933977&_ga_adgroupid=180146800292&_ga_keyword=&_ga_device=m&_ga_target=pla-295238231169&_ga_locint=&_ga_locphy=9071723&_ga_matchtype=&_ga_network=g&_ga_device=m&_ga_placement=&_gcl_id=CjwKCAjwlt7GBhAvEiwAKal0cvkVE_hstv24cDiaICsIk1oznH9zAoJf3By6vR3Tpe7jmByqM6JFHBoCZYAQAvD_BwE&gad_source=1&gad_campaignid=22235933977&gbraid=0AAAAADPiTbo1xAuvnjIWWYnezivf-BUSY&gclid=CjwKCAjwlt7GBhAvEiwAKal0cvkVE_hstv24cDiaICsIk1oznH9zAoJf3By6vR3Tpe7jmByqM6JFHBoCZYAQAvD_BwE    
    • That's kind of what I was getting at saying you'd be here soon regarding length etc being able to add additional restriction.  My assumption (possible donkeys of you and mption) is that the length of hose to an oil cooler, and back, isn't going to be that huge of a loss. Typically you're talking about 1.5m of total length. And so far everyone in our world hasn't had issues with oil not being able to get to a cooler and back, it's more been, how the heck do we get the oil out of the head and back down to the bottom? I'd nearly hazard a guess the biggest issue people have with oil cooling and oil supply, is being able to get the heat out at the cooler itself (not enough air flow, too small of a cooler etc) Also, when people mount them wrong and make really awesome air traps so they've dramatically diminished the cooling capacity.
    • I will rebutt this and the preceding point from Dose....but without doing any calcs to demonstrate anything and without knowing that I am right or wrong. But... The flow capacity of a fluid transfer system is not limited by the smallest orifice or section of conduit in that system, unless it is drastically smaller than the rest of the system. OK, I use the word drastically perhaps with too much emphasis, but let's drill down on what I really mean. The flow capacity of the system is the result of the sum of the restrictions of the entire system. So, to make an extreme example, if you have a network with 3" pipe everywhere (and let's say a total length of only a few metres) and that 12mm ID restriction of the oil filter connection being the obvious restriction, then for any given amount of pressure available, the vast majority of all the pressure drop in the system is going to occur in the 12mm restriction. But.... increase the length of the 3" pipeline to, say 1000m, and suddenly the pipe pressure loss will likely add up to either be in the same order of magnitude, possibly even exceeding that of the 12mm restriction. Now the 12mm restriction starts to matter less. Translate this to the actual engine, actual oil cooler hose sizing, etc etc, and perhaps: The pressure loss caused by flowing through the narrow section (being the 12mm oil filter port, and perhaps any internal engine oil flow pathways associated with it) is a certain number. The pressure loss through, say, -12 hoses out to the cooler and back is negligible, but The pressure loss through -10 hoses out to the cooler, at the exact same length as the above, starts to become a decent fraction of the loss through the 12mm stuff at the filter port. Maybe even it starts to exceed it. I could actually do these calcs if I knew 1) how much oil was actually flowing in the line, 2) gave enough of a f**k to do things that I hate doing for work, voluntarily for a hypothetical discussion. Anyway - I reiterate. It's not the narrowest port that necessarily determines how much it can all flow. It is the sum. A long enough length of seemingly fat enough pipe can still cause more loss than a semmingly dominant small bore restriction.
    • To pick up what Dose is putting down. Not a lot of point running a huge hose if the motor is still restricted to the smaller size... It's only capable of flowing so much at that point...   *Waits for GTSBoy to come in and bring in the technicalities of length of pipe, and additional restriction from wall friction etc etc*
    • Hooley Dooley these things have some history! If i sell them they will need a certificate of providence to prove they have been in the hands of verified RB20 royalty! They have been stored in a plastic tub, away from sunlight and moisture. They are in mint condition. And they will stay that way, as i have sprung the money for a set of shockworks coilovers. I'm just working on getting them in at the moment, after rebushing the rear of the car, and while the subframe was out i welded in the GKtech reinforcement bracing as well.  They will get a workout at Ararat King of The Hill in November. I ran 48s on the short course there a few months ago, and i am hoping with new bushes and shocks in the rear i can launch a bit harder. There was a fair bit of axle tramp when i tried too hard off the line. a few of the corners had dips mid way which also made the car feel a bit unsettled, hopefully this will help there too.   
×
×
  • Create New...