Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I'm looking for some lighter rear springs for my GTR32.

These are a 'home brand' spring, and for 40 bucks a pair, it seems pretty reasonable.

http://www.ebay.com.au/itm/370668179346?ssPageName=STRK:MEWAX:IT&_trksid=p3984.m1423.l2649

Question is, are these really any worse (or are Swift really any better) than Swift springs at $160-180 for a pair?

http://www.ebay.com.au/itm/170818582040?ssPageName=STRK:MEWAX:IT&_trksid=p3984.m1423.l2649

or are there locals (e.g. King Springs)?

cheers

Quality of the steel used, quality of the heat treatment done. These are the main differences. But then there are the simple things like how well tidied up the top and bottom of the coils are, how well designed the spring is (for the given rate) to determine how much free length vs bound length there is.

A cheap spring can very easily be a complete knock off of a good spring and therefore be of perfectly fine design.....but the question of the quality of material and treatment remains.

Edit - Oh, and Kings are fine.

Edited by GTSBoy

The other factor is the accuracy of the spring rate. You only need a small diameter change in the wire to make a big spring rate difference.

Why not Eibach? They are as good as you will get. I have boxes of the things after trying various rates and they are all excellent.

Also what length are you after?

Also do you need them to bow out in the centre. Swift and Hyperco all have a noticeable bow-out in the centre. It's all part of a design to reduce the amount of material and mass and increasing usable range (free height - block height). It also has a side effect of improving clearance over things like caps on the top of the shock bodies, etc.

IF you are getting a short spring 8" or less then the total usable length of the spring can start to be relevant. So you need to know block height, you want to stay away from block height or you run the risk of literally getting kicked off the road/track by a large bump or ripple strip.

What:

Height

Rate

ID

thanks for the reply fellas

simpletool, I don't know about bow out or if I need it; I'm currently running Swifts on my remote reservoir Ohlins

djr81, I'm looking for a pair of 65mm ID, 8" (203mm?), in 5kg/mm

happy to go eibach if you have some in that size? They're for the back of a r32 GTR so I assume I could go slightly longer if necessary as the spring adjustment is a reasonable range.

on this, I am currently running 8kg/mm and 6kg/mm on these Ohlins below.

They rear end is a bit stiff for the road, should I swap rears only to something like 4kg/mm or 5kg/mm, and leave the fronts the same, or change the fronts as well? Eibach do a 4.4kg/mm model 0800.250.0250

600x450-2010081600018.jpg

It won't just be the springs Marcus.

It's also the actual shock rebound and various other things that come into play.

I'm pretty certain I had 8/6 in my GTR and the rear was very soft compared to move, but they were custom valve'd (Tien) to suit and the shocker was quite forgiving.

It won't just be the springs Marcus.

It's also the actual shock rebound and various other things that come into play.

I'm pretty certain I had 8/6 in my GTR and the rear was very soft compared to move, but they were custom valve'd (Tien) to suit and the shocker was quite forgiving.

Thanks Ash, maybe i'll get the suspension fellas to back off the compression damping and up the rebound a touch and see how that goes first.

Yeah give it a go first.

(you taking it out the back of my place? :laugh:).

Perhaps give Traction Tyres a go - bit of a drive, but that have always served me well in that regard along with other SAU members if you tell them what you want from the car :)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I myself AM TOTALLY UNPREPARED TO BELIEVE that the load is higher on the track than on the dyno. If it is not happening on the dyno, I cannot see it happening on the track. The difference you are seeing is because it is hot on the track, and I am pretty sure your tuner is not belting the crap out of it on teh dyno when it starts to get hot. The only way that being hot on the track can lead to real ping, that I can think of, is if you are getting more oil (from mist in the inlet tract, or going up past the oil control rings) reducing the effective octane rating of the fuel and causing ping that way. Yeah, nah. Look at this graph which I will helpfully show you zoomed back in. As an engineer, I look at the difference in viscocity at (in your case, 125°C) and say "they're all the same number". Even though those lines are not completely collapsed down onto each other, the oil grades you are talking about (40, 50 and 60) are teh top three lines (150, 220 and 320) and as far as I am concerned, there is not enough difference between them at that temperature to be meaningful. The viscosity of 60 at 125°C is teh same as 40 at 100°C. You should not operate it under high load at high temperature. That is purely because the only way they can achieve their emissions numbers is with thin-arse oil in it, so they have to tell you to put thin oil in it for the street. They know that no-one can drive the car & engine hard enough on the street to reach the operating regime that demands the actual correct oil that the engine needs on the track. And so they tell you to put that oil in for the track. Find a way to get more air into it, or, more likely, out of it. Or add a water spray for when it's hot. Or something.   As to the leak --- a small leak that cannot cause near catastrophic volume loss in a few seconds cannot cause a low pressure condition in the engine. If the leak is large enough to drop oil pressure, then you will only get one or two shots at it before the sump is drained.
    • So..... it's going to be a heater hose or other coolant hose at the rear of the head/plenum. Or it's going to be one of the welch plugs on the back of the motor, which is a motor out thing to fix.
    • The oil pressure sensor for logging, does it happen to be the one that was slowly breaking out of the oil block? If it is,I would be ignoring your logs. You had a leak at the sensor which would mean it can't read accurately. It's a small hole at the sensor, and you had a small hole just before it, meaning you could have lost significant pressure reading.   As for brakes, if it's just fluid getting old, you won't necessarily end up with air sitting in the line. Bleed a shit tonne of fluid through so you effectively replace it and go again. Oh and, pay close attention to the pressure gauge while on track!
    • I don't know it is due to that. It could just be due to load on track being more than a dyno. But it would be nice to rule it out. We're talking a fraction of a second of pulling ~1 degree of timing. So it's not a lot, but I'd rather it be 0... Thicker oil isn't really a "bandaid" if it's oil that is going to run at 125C, is it? It will be thicker at 100 and thus at 125, where the 40 weight may not be as thick as one may like for that use. I already have a big pump that has been ported. They (They in this instance being the guy that built my heads) port them so they flow more at lower RPM but have a bypass spring that I believe is ~70psi. I have seen 70psi of oil pressure up top in the past, before I knew I had this leak. I have a 25 row oil cooler that takes up all the space in the driver side guard. It is interesting that GM themselves recommend 0-30 oil for their Vette applications. Unless you take it to the track where the official word is to put 20-50w oil in there, then take that back out after your track day is done and return to 0-30.
    • Nice, looks great. Nice work getting the factory parts also. Never know when you'll need them.
×
×
  • Create New...