Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey forum whats up? Just need a little help from you guys, in re calibrating a ford lightning maf. I have a z32 maf presently on the car and from logs shows that it is maxed out. I am getting a lightning maf and want to know how do I go about re calibrating the pfc to use it. I have datalogit and a pfc just do not know what to do to re calibrate it for use with the new maf.

Can someone please give me a step by step on how to do this?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/413586-need-info-on-how-to-recalbrate-maf/
Share on other sites

this will be hard man, and not werth the time. well for me that is. I would sell the power fc and get another one. like A d-jetro, but i never went the root as i hate ford. i just got a Haltch PS 2000, and that was fun learning to tune them, and they really don't support Knock which i don't like. other than that they are greate.

Now after the years i lernt to get the GTR L-jetro to run a gtst using the two AFM, and i loved it because i was a FC guru by then (2x Z32). i just got addicted to ani lag. so motec haltech and D-jetro (no anti lag on FC) all the way. You need to change ECU you are making good power and need to swallow the pill and upgrade properly.

Is the AFM actually maxing out at peak power, or is it just peaking at 5v and maxing out at 4.x volts? You should see a theoretical max of 350kw with a single Z32

I agree that calibrating the AFM needs a dyno, you need to map out the voltage curve (plotting various voltage positions vs the stock AFM at idle, WOT etc) as the PFC doesn't have the specs for lightning MAFs builtin. I've read the VQ maps are close and maybe can be tweaked to suit.

Nistune does have support for lightning mafs though, you might be able to copy the specs and use them for the PFC.

Is the AFM actually maxing out at peak power, or is it just peaking at 5v and maxing out at 4.x volts? You should see a theoretical max of 350kw with a single Z32

Well according to the pfc log from I hit max boost that surge right before boost settles in I am on load point 20 and from there on load point 19. This is from 4000 rpm until doing a third ger pull from about 2000. 62mm turbo at 25psi. I have not really wot cause I am afraid to lean out and damage the engine. So I am wot until my waste gate yanks opens then about 80% throttle through the rest of the rpm and at tht level on load point 18-19.

I agree that calibrating the AFM needs a dyno, you need to map out the voltage curve (plotting various voltage positions vs the stock AFM at idle, WOT etc) as the PFC doesn't have the specs for lightning MAFs builtin. I've read the VQ maps are close and maybe can be tweaked to suit.

Nistune does have support for lightning mafs though, you might be able to copy the specs and use them for the PFC.

WOW didn't know it was so involved. Thought it was just a simple voltage to load point change. Thought I would just go to point 5 in fc edit change voltages at the rpm points and then tune the injectors to suit.

this will be hard man, and not werth the time. well for me that is. I would sell the power fc and get another one. like A d-jetro, but i never went the root as i hate ford. i just got a Haltch PS 2000, and that was fun learning to tune them, and they really don't support Knock which i don't like. other than that they are greate.

LOL I know the whole import versus domestic thing. See and thats what I am trying to avoid, buying a next ecu, they say the ford afm is good for 700-800whp. Not aiming that high but just want the room for safety and future. With a simple afm rescale car would be able to get to the next level and support the level I am at now. I even heard of a resistor mod and then rescale with the z32 that according to results should theoretically support 1000hp. Again not aiming that high but with safety and future mods in mind this would be a great mod without having to dish 2000 dollrs or so on another ecu.

Now after the years i lernt to get the GTR L-jetro to run a gtst using the two AFM, and i loved it because i was a FC guru by then (2x Z32). i just got addicted to ani lag. so motec haltech and D-jetro (no anti lag on FC) all the way. You need to change ECU you are making good power and need to swallow the pill and upgrade properly.

to be clear

hitting load point 20 doesnt mean the AFM is maxing out

see if the AFM peaks at 5.0v

if it doesnt, the afm is not maxing out and you need to rescale the load axis - datalogit can do this and a competent tuner can do this

also

if your using a djetro map sensor version what do you think happens when you hit target boost of say 2.1kgcm2?

the map sensor is 3.3v and 2.1kgcm from 4000rpm to redline.... so the load axis never changes?

why because boost never increases

so by changing to a map sensor - you get the same result

  • 7 months later...

Hey forum sorry to bring up an old thread but I am getting nowhere with trying to calibrate the ford lightning maf to work with my pfc. Is there anyone out there who can give me a tutorial, some info or numbers to put in the pfc to get me started? What numbers do I need to change cause I can not even get it started? If anyone has any idea and was wanting to try and cakibrate one of these meters on a pfc hit me up and let me know what to do/try. All/Any help is appreciated.

I already did. I told you to compare their VQ maps in Nistune.

Yes I saw that but i am in need of more assistance. the trial version of nistune that I have downloaded only stays open for 5 mins or so and that is not enough time to compare all the maps i have to. I need more of a tutorial or for someone who has done it already to share the maps with me or walk me through how to re-scale mine. When I am in fc edit for example and at the maf settings table, the only number I should have to change would be the numbers that are associated with the maf that I am re-scaling right, this would be the chart located at the bottom of the page in fc edit?

I can't see it taking more than 5 minutes to open Nistune, change the VQ table to the lightning one, take a screen shot if you need to, change it to something you can cross reference (like a Z32), take another screenshot if you need to. Job done. I mean, it's just a case of converting voltage to another number.

I can't see it taking more than 5 minutes to open Nistune, change the VQ table to the lightning one, take a screen shot if you need to, change it to something you can cross reference (like a Z32), take another screenshot if you need to. Job done. I mean, it's just a case of converting voltage to another number.

Hey there thanks for the advice. I crossed referenced the lightning and z32 came up with a couple of numbers and got the car started. Hooray!!!!!!! Just needed that lil push to get it done.

I have another question for you. My idle is a bit funny and I wanted to know if to correct that I need to adjust the voltage or load part of the curve? I tried the load part but it doesn't really seem to make a difference. If I were to adjust the voltage will that in turn make my max voltage less?

Perhaps a 5 second tutorial on how this stuff all works is needed.

1) An amount of air flows over the hot wire. At idle this is a small amount, at various loads it is a larger amount. The AFM outputs a voltage that is directly proportional to the amount of air. When I say "directly proportional", I don't mean that it is exactly linear.....the voltage output and the actual air flow amount are not linearly related, but as the air flow goes up, so does the voltage.

2) The ECU sees this voltage, and because someone worked out what the relationship between air flow and voltage is, there is a map (the VQ map) in the ECU that tells the ECU how much air is flowing based on that voltage. (this is actually slightly simplified, because there is another factor, the "k" factor, that gets involved in calculating the air flow. Perhaps let's just say the VQ map is used to define the shape of the non-linear relationship between AFM voltage and actual air flow).

3) The ECU now knows how much air is flowing, and in combination with a few other inputs (like rpm) can work out what the load on the engine is. That load value is now used to look up the various maps that depend on load for fuelling, ignition, etc.

So you can see that unless the AFM is faulty there is no reason to mess with the ECU's calculations at any point before step 3 in the above list. Steps 1 and 2 are just the physical relationship between real air flow and the AFM's signal to the ECU. You only mess with this stuff if you're desperate. The best thing to do is to tune the ECU's response to that load signal as required. If it's too lean at 50% load, you simply add fuelling at that point in the map. If the idle is fluffy because it's too rich, you take fuel away from the idle part of the map (or, if there is a separate idle map, you work in there).

There is one further complication though, and I'm not sure how this applies to PowerFCs, because I haven't played with them much. The Nissan ECUs have a concept called the k factor which is used to turn the VQ map output into the load signal (known as TP, or theoretical pulse) that is used to look up the maps. If you change the AFM to one that has double the capacity (say) then you need to change the k factor by the same amount to account for the fact that when reading the same voltage, the bigger AFM is sensing double the air flow. There is a similar factor in the PFCs (called injection correction or something similar) that needs adjusting. There should be ample documentation and posts around here to help you out on that score.

**edit. Had to move something I added to the first numbered point down to the second numbered point coz I put it in the wrong spot and it made no sense!

Edited by GTSBoy

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Who did you have do the installation? I actually know someone who is VERY familiar with the AVS gear. The main point of contact though would be your installer.   Where are you based in NZ?
    • Look, realistically, those are some fairly chunky connectors and wires so it is a reasonably fair bet that that loom was involved in the redirection of the fuel pump and/or ECU/ignition power for the immobiliser. It's also fair to be that the new immobiliser is essentially the same thing as the old one, and so it probably needs the same stuff done to make it do what it has to do. Given that you are talking about a car that no-one else here is familiar with (I mean your exact car) and an alarm that I've never heard of before and so probably not many others are familiar with, and that some wire monkey has been messing with it out of our sight, it seems reasonable that the wire monkey should be fixing this.
    • Wheel alignment immediately. Not "when I get around to it". And further to what Duncan said - you cannot just put camber arms on and shorten them. You will introduce bump steer far in excess of what the car had with stock arms. You need adjustable tension arms and they need to be shortened also. The simplest approach is to shorten them the same % as the stock ones. This will not be correct or optimal, but it will be better than any other guess. The correct way to set the lengths of both arms is to use a properly built/set up bump steer gauge and trial and error the adjustments until you hit the camber you need and want and have minimum bump steer in the range of motion that the wheel is expected to travel. And what Duncan said about toe is also very true. And you cannot change the camber arm without also affecting toe. So when you have adjustable arms on the back of a Skyline, the car either needs to go to a talented wheel aligner (not your local tyre shop dropout), or you need to be able to do this stuff yourself at home. Guess which approach I have taken? I have built my own gear for camber, toe and bump steer measurement and I do all this on the flattest bit of concrete I have, with some shims under the tyres on one side to level the car.
    • Thought I would get some advice from others on this situation.    Relevant info: R33 GTS25t Link G4x ECU Walbro 255LPH w/ OEM FP Relay (No relay mod) Scenario: I accidentally messed up my old AVS S5 (rev.1) at the start of the year and the cars been immobilised. Also the siren BBU has completely failed; so I decided to upgrade it.  I got a newer AVS S5 (rev.2?) installed on Friday. The guy removed the old one and its immobilisers. Tried to start it; the car cranks but doesnt start.  The new one was installed and all the alarm functions seem to be working as they should; still wouldn't start Went to bed; got up on Friday morning and decided to have a look into the no start problem. Found the car completely dead.  Charged the battery; plugged it back in and found the brake lights were stuck on.  Unplugging the brake pedal switch the lights turn off. Plug it back in and theyre stuck on again. I tested the switch (continuity test and resistance); all looks good (0-1kohm).  On talking to AVS; found its because of the rubber stopper on the brake pedal; sure enough the middle of it is missing so have ordered a new one. One of those wear items; which was confusing what was going on However when I try unplugging the STOP Light fuses (under the dash and under the hood) the brake light still stays on. Should those fuses not cut the brake light circuit?  I then checked the ECU; FP Speed Error.  Testing the pump again; I can hear the relay clicking every time I switch it to ON. I unplugged the pump and put the multimeter across the plug. No continuity; im seeing 0.6V (ECU signal?) and when it switches the relay I think its like 20mA or 200mA). Not seeing 12.4V / 7-9A. As far as I know; the Fuel Pump was wired through one of the immobiliser relays on the old alarm.  He pulled some thick gauged harness out with the old alarm wiring; which looks to me like it was to bridge connections into the immobilisers? Before it got immobilised it was running just fine.  Im at a loss to why the FP is getting no voltage; I thought maybe the FP was faulty (even though I havent even done 50km on the new pump) but no voltage at the harness plug.  Questions: Could it be he didnt reconnect the fuel pump when testing it after the old alarm removal (before installing the new alarm)?  Is this a case of bridging to the brake lights instead of the fuel pump circuit? It's a bit beyond me as I dont do a lot with electrical; so have tried my best to diagnose what I think seems to make sense.  Seeking advice if theres for sure an issue with the alarm install to get him back here; or if I do infact, need an auto electrician to diagnose it. 
    • Then, shorten them by 1cm, drop the car back down and have a visual look (or even better, use a spirit level across the wheel to see if you have less camber than before. You still want something like 1.5 for road use. Alternatively, if you have adjustable rear ride height (I assume you do if you have extreme camber wear), raise the suspension back to standard height until you can get it all aligned properly. Finally, keep in mind that wear on the inside of the tyre can be for incorrect toe, not just camber
×
×
  • Create New...