Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • 1 month later...

Simon from what I've been told by an engineer having the radiator sitting in the boot will increase the temp of the coolant only to be compensated by the better air flow and resulting in the same temps you already have. The best place for that radiator is in the front however why not run a secondary radiator elsewhere? Maybe a smaller one surrounded by dry ice just for those hot days, Could mount it underneath your passenger headlight where the stock intercooler would normally sit. Could also look into v8 supercar water pump systems and run the pump separate from the engine increasing it's efficiency.

^^^^

There is only 1 Supercar team I know of that run an external water pump system and their cars are abortions.

Any Perkins built engine has a Perkins machined factory located water pump

KRE built engines use an off the shelf replacement

DJR use off the shelf

GRM use edelbrock

The list goes on.

A mate of mine is currently reassembling last years main game Kelly racing cars that were run for reindler and murphy. They have Perkins water pumps that are a super flash CNC'ed housing and as a let down have a factory 5L holden impeller inside them....

Guess what... Putting the radiator in the boot requires an external pump...?? And I'm not thinking of any small pump I'm thinking like a grundfos industrial pump.

Anyway instead of running an external water pump how about an external refrigeration system? Compressor/condenser and have the refrigerant cool the end tanks some how?

Just a little input.

I had a custom radiator built for my R32 GTR.

Was a twin pass cross flow. PWR 2" dual core with custom alloy tanks.

Had non stop problems. Wouldnt keep the car cool and the core leaked twice in 3 months.

For me the alloy radiator wasnt any good.

Then had exactly the same radiator made up in brass and copper.

Now I cant get my car to overheat no matter what i do.

It seems to disperse the heat much more efficiently.

Gojira the issue isn't that it has problems and overheats it's that in a drift car your not going straight very often at all and have very little air flow at the front, there's just not enough air flowing through the radiator to keep it cool on really hot days

Mungy, I understand that, i was only stating that a brass and copper radiator will help disperse the heat more efficiently than an alloy equivalent, in which case, may help in reducing coolant temps.

If your going to go through all the trouble of mounting the radiator in the floor pan of the boot and are worried about it lying down, why not have the radiator standing up and mount it where the sheet metal between the back seat and the boot should be? Seal it off, use the same ducting concept, and have it venting up out of the bootlid with another duct.

Dale, yes i had a look at the radiator cores before everything was done, they are both tube and fin, same shape turbulators, same core size, same tube and fin count/inch, same tank design. They are identical.

Done properly copper cores can be good but the old OE ones had the finns/gills "glued" to the flat sided tubes with solder and its high lead content makes solder a poor conductor . The eco Nazis hade lead and copper and just about priced them out of te mass market . Also by comparison ally core composite tank radiators are significantly lighter and more compact than the 70s era copper and brass radiators .

Core design . To each their own but I don't like multi pass radiators because they halve the flow path increasing resistance to flow . I also dislike multi row cores because where there is gaps between the rows of tubes there are no gills or cooling ability . In other words a significant increase in depth or thickness if you like for not that much of an increase in heat transfer . If you get the chance look in the top of a multitube core and note how deep the tubes aren't . It makes me wonder if it was a cost cutting exercise using commonly available tubes and finns .

I reckon the best OE style core I've seen is the Koyo R32 GTR one I used to use mainly because it has a single row of tubes that are quite deep , something like 20-25mm , meaning a lot of surface area for the finns - and a lot of finn area too .

Something else to possibly think about is engine tuning to see if you can find ways to get enough power / torque while minimising heat into the cooling systems .

Examples I've been told about is RBs being slightly short changed exhaust valve wise and playing around with exhaust cam timing can at times reduce coolant temps . Years ago I read about people ceramic coating chambers/exhaust valves/exhaust ports to keep the heat in the gas and out of the head and its cooling water .

Lastly rather than the RB 6 is it possible to get enough power out of an inline KA24DE+T , because if it is you get to use an OE engine option thats a lot shorter than an RB25 and possibly easier to cool with more conventional style cooling systems . I wouldn't mind betting someone in the US has tried drifting in a turbocharged S14 240SX and found any issues . Typically their aftermarket has just about everything you'd ever want for a KA24DE engine .

The longer stroke may actually help put the torque where you want it for a drifter , worth checking .

Something to read .

http://forums.nicoclub.com/drift-topic-ka24de-t-vs-sr20det-t516219.html

A .

Edited by discopotato03

Definatley correct about the ka being able to produce that kind of power and tourqe however we have 2 problems, we are not in the states and finding a ka engine would be hard let alone parts second problem is it a 4 cylinder, running that kind of power through it will make it utterly unreliable and will destroy itself much sooner than the rb costing an enormous amount of money more overall, if simon was going to swap engines to reduce temps it would be simpler and cheaper just to put a v8 in. The reason he is running the rb is because it suits his driving style and is cost effective.

how about a water spray setup for the radiator.. surely it would drop the temps a bit? maybe even using cold water?

just putting it out there... was planning to maybe doing this on mine.. im no engineer but it makes sense to me and i can't see any draw backs from it.. if it works for the intercooler why not for the radiator

cheers

yeah it would work well... might still do it yet. the boot mounted rad idea is shaping up to be an expensive task.

might make a 20L water container for the boot that does both rad and intercooler and be done with it haha

Really? wow I never thought you would chew through that much that quickly. I'm not really sure how big the jets or how many your running or the pressure that they are getting. From my experience with mining mixing equipment some times your better off getting a spray that will create a proper mist/fog rather than a big spray that will cause droplets. But to acheive it you would probly need a decent high pressure pump

Have you every tried a twin pass radiator Simon?

There is a company that's isn't pwr that make very high quality ones that don't seem to give any problems.

Another issue that some people may be overlooking is cavitation caused by your high revs and low air speed due to sideways ect.

I've been told in the past that under drive pullys should be used on drift cars.

I personally hate electric water pumps because a they are always fitted to gay rotors and b they fail more often than work.

Man I got a wierd arse idea, how about you mould/mount a big arse radiator in the bonnet? shorter hoses than going all the way to the boot hence cooler water right into the engine, with 2 big arse fans or even 4? two on each side sucking outwards? just a thought dont rape me for it haha lol :D.

  • 4 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Oof. One of my mates has an R34 GT-R that he initially was a "I want to go twins for response and convenience" on his stock 2.6 with Kelford 272 cams, but his friends are pests and were always in his ear about their place being in the bin.   Eventually one of the 2860-5s decided to add it's own input and force his hand, so he conceded and went for a Pulsar 6262G ("G35 900") with T4 0.85 hotside.    Here's an overlay of the results, same cams, same stock bottom end, same boost, same fuel, just from a pretty tidy 2860-5 install to a Pulsar turbo on a 6boost maniifold on BP98.   Worth mentioning here, it may seem like a dead horse thing but the dyno plot doesn't tell the story of how much better it is to drive - transient response has completely changed the car, he used to have flat foot shifting to stop it having to wind up again on gear changes even at >7000rpm... now it builds boost faster than that even short shifting.   It's 100% transformed the car before you even consider how much better it holds on: Pulsar and Garrett aren't the same, but from our experience if you're just looking for a better drive and the ability to make the same or more power I think the divided G30 770 would probably be the smallest I'd go to.
    • Great work Duncan, any events local you will give it a test once all done? 
    • Sweet, yeah hoping stock gears will hold up. May use the transbrake feature on hill climb starts so that will test it.
    • Yeah, the thread is only nearly 20 years old.
    • Been down in Tassie for 2 weeks (a cruise, not a race for once) but spent a little time on her when I got back. I worked out the injector settings in the PowerFC were not correct for nismo 555s, set those to 66% +10ms and added a little air at closed throttle, set the timing (approximately, because it has some weird non 15o cells around idle) and now she starts and idles properly. She purrs like a kitten (ignore the co2 alarm in the background, I did  ) 20250518_171052.mp4 Next step, off for run-in, tuning and alignment!
×
×
  • Create New...